On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Jose Mario Quintana <[email protected]> wrote: > For what is worth, clearly, I do not like this proposal: it would require > changes to the dictionary; these changes would add complexity to the > definitions; the definitions would be less consistent since they would > introduce exceptions. Although the change would prevent certain crashes, > which are unlikely to occur by chance, it would do so by forcing a > limitation which might even brake some existent code.
What changes would be required in the dictionary? Thanks, -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
