To get symbol-table collisions all you would need is to create a lot of
names. I will do that, after I have put in code that will actually go
through this branch.
Henry
On 6/22/2016 9:10 AM, bill lam wrote:
I am not sure what jttraverse intended to do. One way to get symbol table
collision is change hash to a extremely poor one, eg. always return 1.
On Jun 22, 2016 8:12 PM, "Raul Miller" <rauldmil...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hmm... so maybe we are looking for some way of getting symbol table
collisions?
Thanks,
--
Raul
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Henry Rich <henryhr...@gmail.com> wrote:
Sure - I have verified that the code is not used during the J test suite.
That doesn't tell me whether the design is wrong, though.
Henry
On 6/22/2016 12:46 AM, Raul Miller wrote:
Can't you just test it?
If you don't want to use a debugger, you can insert printf statements
or something like that to see when a point in the code has been
reached.
Or, if you prefer, I could test it.... (I stalled out, getting the
thing to compile, under OSX - but if you need the support, I should be
able to motivate myself to work through those issues).
Thanks,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
