Note how mapped nouns work in this area.

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Henry Rich <henryhr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The issue:
>
> ipm =: 3 : 0
>
> ip =: 2 (0}) ip
>
> )
>
>    ip =: i. 3
>
>    (ipm '') ] ip
>
> 2 1 2
>
>
> As you see, ip was modified by call to ipm, which did an in-place
> assignment.  This violates the rules, which say that the value of ip should
> have been stacked.  In fact, a pointer to the value is stacked.
>
>
> This requires a decision.  I think we need a committee of J Language
> Experts to decide how to resolve issues like this, and future enhancements.
>
>
> The choices as I see them are:
>
> 1 - Fix to conform to the Dictionary.  Possible; would slow things down a
> little; would make some assignments currently done in-place perform a copy.
>
>
> 2 - Ignore it.  Leave as is.
>
>
> 3 - Embrace it - declare that in-place assignments to global variables may
> affect previously-stacked references to the same name.  [With local
> variables the problem does not arise]
>
> Now we need a Language Committee, and a decision.
>
>
> Henry
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to