I think we have not set things up and repos have multiplied before we have procedures in place.
We have an official Jsoftware repo and in a real sense that is the only repo that Jsoftware really cares about. The github repo was set up (I'm guessing here) for people who wanted to work completely (or nearly completely) outside of Jsoftware. The unbox repo has been set up in somewhat the same way. People who want to help with the evolution of the official Jsoftware products need to read what we have written about J Primary Developers and J Contributor Developers. This is all still in the very early stages and we are feeling our way slowly. Although things are moving very well with the work that Henry has been doing. We welcome input has suggestions about how we should be doing things. But remember that we are very conservative in terms of changes and our primary commitment is to continue the stability and nature of the JE. On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 8:23 PM, Marshall Lochbaum <mwlochb...@gmail.com> wrote: > I do see your commits (sp.?). The latest is "Use standard boxdraw > characters in test of simple boxing" six days ago. > > Using two different repositories just to handle different hosts would be > a huge hassle, so I suspect there is just one. If not, they need to be > combined post-haste. > > Marshall > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 08:07:18PM -0400, Henry Rich wrote: > > Yes, but I don't know whether they did it that way. I have wondered > > if all the comments I have added are visible on Github. Do you know? > > > > hhr > > > > On 6/28/2016 8:05 PM, Marshall Lochbaum wrote: > > >If the internal Jsoftware source uses the same repo as jsource on > > >Github, then you can get code from Github to the other repository by a > > >merge and then a git push. You just have to set the repo to have two > > >remotes (using git remote add). > > > > > >Marshall > > > > > >On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 06:40:22PM -0400, Eric Iverson wrote: > > >>We are not currently following up on these pull requests. We want to, > but I > > >>don't know for sure how quickly we'll get to it. Having multiple repos > > >>other than our own is probably going to turn out to be a mistake. > Great if > > >>they move in different directions, but not so good at keeping the core > > >>Jsoftware product stable. > > >> > > >>On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Marshall Lochbaum < > mwlochb...@gmail.com> > > >>wrote: > > >> > > >>>I sent a pull request to jsource fixing this and other issues two > weeks > > >>>ago. Is there anyone monitoring the jsource Github repository? Is > there > > >>>something else I need to do or another method I should use to send a > > >>>patch? > > >>> > > >>>Marshall > > >>> > > >>>On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 10:32:00AM -0400, Marshall Lochbaum wrote: > > >>>>This is correct; I fixed it in unbox a while ago. I will look at the > > >>>>differences between unbox and jsource and pull request my changes > soon. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > https://github.com/iocane/unbox/commit/47be693df5554be0f884308888f4e08fac00d823 > > >>>>Marshall > > >>>> > > >>>>On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 06:46:54PM +0800, bill lam wrote: > > >>>>>I think the proper fix should be > > >>>>>*(D*)wv > > >>>>>---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > >>>>>From: "Peter Panaguiton" <notificati...@github.com> > > >>>>>Date: Jun 10, 2016 4:38 AM > > >>>>>Subject: [jsoftware/jsource] gcc complaining about type for _isnan. > > >>>(#1) > > >>>>>To: "jsoftware/jsource" <jsou...@noreply.github.com> > > >>>>>Cc: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>Trying to packge the j git version as the current version in the > Nixos > > >>>>>>packages is broken. Built it with this as the only error stopping > it > > >>>from > > >>>>>>being built with Nixos's current gcc (gcc 5.3 and glibc 2.23). > > >>>>>>------------------------------ > > >>>>>>You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> https://github.com/jsoftware/jsource/pull/1 > > >>>>>>Commit Summary > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> - gcc complaining about type for _isnan. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>File Changes > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> - *M* jsrc/f2.c > > >>>>>> <https://github.com/jsoftware/jsource/pull/1/files#diff-0> (2) > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>Patch Links: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> - https://github.com/jsoftware/jsource/pull/1.patch > > >>>>>> - https://github.com/jsoftware/jsource/pull/1.diff > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>— > > >>>>>>You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > > >>>>>>Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > > >>>>>><https://github.com/jsoftware/jsource/pull/1>, or mute the thread > > >>>>>>< > > >>> > https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/ABg1YZJ46q9zqI5yvmNYjfcv-3n59I36ks5qKHmtgaJpZM4IyYR7 > > >>>>>>. > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>>>>For information about J forums see > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > >>>---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>>For information about J forums see > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > >>---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
