As Marshall once noted, the biggest deficiency in J is looping over an array when you need a result from each iteration, and the calculation requires an initial value and some internal state. Your code looks like

result {"_1 f/\. array , initialstate

where each execution of f produces a result value plus the internal state to feed into the next iteration. The problems are: * the result is the entire array of internal state, which is more, maybe MUCH more than you need, since the final result needs only a portion of the state * The state is probably not commensurate with a item of the array, so you end up boxing the initial state and the array items, which is very wasteful.

I propose a new primitive, call it N. (for insert). N. is an adverb that produces a conjunction. In (x N.), x specifies options for the processing, much as the right operand of u;.n does.

Definition:

[x] u (n N.) v y

where

u is the function to be applied
v is the selector to apply to the result of each execution of u, to produce the part saved in the final result x is the (optional) initial value (if omitted, f is applied first between the last 2 items of y)
y is the argument array
n selects from several variants:
 bit 0=0  operation goes back to front
 bit 0=1  operation goes front to back, as if using &.|.
 bit 1=0  selected result from each iteration becomes one item of result
bit 1=1 selected result from each iteration is boxed before becoming an item of result

Formal definition:
Ndot0 =: 2 : 0
v&{@> u&.>/\. (<"_1 y)
:
v&{@> u&.>/\. (<"_1 y) , <x
)
Ndot1 =: 2 : 0
v&{@> u&.>/\.&.|. (<"_1 y)
:
v&{@> u&.>/\.&.|. (<"_1 y) ,~ <x
)
Ndot2 =: 2 : 0
v&{&.> u&.>/\. (<"_1 y)
:
v&{&.> u&.>/\. (<"_1 y) , <x
)
Ndot3 =: 2 : 0
v&{&.> u&.>/\.&.|. (<"_1 y)
:
v&{&.> u&.>/\.&.|. (<"_1 y) ,~ <x
)

Ndot =: 1 : 0
assert. m e. i. 4
select. m
case. 0 do. Ndot0
case. 1 do. Ndot1
case. 2 do. Ndot2
case. 3 do. Ndot3
end.
)


I look forward to criticism of this proposal.

Henry Rich

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to