It happens (I know from experience). :)
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 1:27 PM, agroeneveld400 <agroeneveld...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> Sorry. Didn't read your message well enough.
>
> Verzonden vanaf Samsung Mobile.
>
> <div>-------- Oorspronkelijk bericht --------</div><div>Van: Jose Mario
> Quintana <jose.mario.quint...@gmail.com> </div><div>Datum:06-10-2017
> 18:22 (GMT+01:00) </div><div>Aan: sou...@jsoftware.com </div><div>Cc:
> </div><div>Onderwerp: Re: [Jsource] d. fix </div><div>
> </div>Right, but both forks (1&* + ^.) and (] + ^.) have rank _ instead of
> rank
> 0. The adverb ("0) could act on the current result when the rank is not 0
> to conform with the Dictionary, for example, producing,
>
> (1 + %)d._1
> (1&* + ^.)"0
>
> (instead of (1&* + ^.)) as J is apparently doing for,
>
> (1 + %)d.0
> (1 + %)"0
>
> (1 + %)"0 d.0
> (1 + %)"0
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 1:38 AM, Arie Groeneveld <agroeneveld...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > (1 + %) d._1 NB. Not OK
> >> 1&* + ^.
> >>
> >
> > It's the same as (]+^.)
> >
> > (1&* -: ]) i.10
> > 1
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
