ethiejiesa,

Impressed with the effort you have put into cleaning up the build process
and your clear statement on what you have done.

We will probably pick this up.

First I would like to cover a few things with you directly (outside of the
forum).

If you are willing, please send me a direct email and we can cover a few
things before Josftware leaps (slowly) into this bright new future.

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 11:45 PM ethiejiesa via Source <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I spent the past week becoming familiar with the make2 build system and
> trying
> my hand at an incremental improvement. The fruits of these efforts are
> compiled
> in a pull request on the jsource repository:
>
> https://github.com/jsoftware/jsource/pull/12
>
> Briefly, my overall goal is to make J easier to build and package.
> Anecdotally,
> I have met many people who have given up on J simply because of the
> idiosyncracy and limitations of its build system.
>
> The PR comment discusses the overall picture of what I am trying to do and
> what
> the code changes actually manage. In total, it is a collection of 9
> commits,
> each with a, hopefully, helpful long-form commit comment.
>
> The `make3` build should work just like `make2` (except for a minor
> generalization of how USE_OPENMP etc can be set). I spent a good bit of
> effort
> making sure that each commit produces exact binary-equivalent build
> products;
> however, due to my build environment and lack of experience with
> darwin/windows, this has only been tested for linux and raspberry.
>
> Let me know what you think!
>
> If this seems like a project jsoftware is interested, I would certainly
> like to
> take this further.
>
> Cheers,
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to