(0) Yes, it looks like I had already taken steps to deal with the 0x case, and clearly they were inadequate.
(1) I cannot find the message you are referring to. (2) I am plugging away, trying various approaches, maybe I'll have this fixed soon. (It would be faster if script/buildga.sh could be told to build only one instance of j, rather than all the various 32 and 64 bit instances. It would also be faster if I did not allow myself to be distracted while waiting for a build to complete.) Thanks, -- Raul On Sat, Dec 2, 2023 at 11:25 AM Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote: > > A couple of messages ago I pointed to the line > > if (unlikely(!n)) {fr(z); R X0;} /* this X0 is presumably the one > that happens */ > > as being suspect, because fr should never be called explicitly. > > That message contained an explanatory paragraph at its end. > > hhr > > On 12/2/2023 2:57 AM, Raul Miller wrote: > > That sounds very plausible. Thanks. > > > > Previously I had a special value that I always used for 0x. It makes > > sense to be using it here. > > > > I'll try that and see if it clears things up. > > > > Thanks again, > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
