On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Amanda Waite<Amanda.Waite at sun.com> wrote:
> Did tags and actions support make it into the last SJ update?
no
> Or if not do
> we have any idea when they will?
>
when laca will stop sitting on the patch:)
> Cheers
>
> Amanda
>
>
> Andras Barna wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Amanda Waite <Amanda.Waite at sun.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks Andy,
>>>
>>> In the meantime are submitters able to access any other IPS actions?
>>> Adding
>>> users/groups, registering SMF manifests etc?
>>>
>>
>> not really, it needs user action
>> like: svcadm restart manifest-import
>> but with the manifest you can add user/groups etc
>>
>> so it's kinda compilated..
>>
>> that's why i hope that it will be in jucr ASAP
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Some of these packages need a
>>> reasonable amount of thought to their design so as the make them useful
>>> and
>>> we have to be aware of the options that are available as well as the ones
>>> that are not.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Amanda
>>>
>>>
>>> Andras Barna wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Amanda Waite <Amanda.Waite at sun.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi there,
>>>>>
>>>>> Will the tags support allow us to use the preserve action on files
>>>>> (renamenew, renameold, etc) or is that there already?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> yes
>>>> you can do what you want
>>>>
>>>> example:
>>>> %ips_tag(preserve=renamenew) ?%{_sysconfdir}/foo.conf
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> When are we likely to see SourceJuicer updated with these changes?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> i dont know.
>>>> but i hope that in this month
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Amanda
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Emanuele Pucciarelli wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 04:47, Shawn Walker <swalker at opensolaris.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If I recall correctly, you can specify the user and group actions in
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> same package that needs them. ?ips should resort the actions so that
>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>> are performed first.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I checked the source code for actions/generic.py and
>>>>>> client/imageplan.py and re-tested, and you're correct. In all
>>>>>> likelihood I made a mistake when testing this two days ago. Apologies.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list
>>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list
> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss
>
--
Andy
http://blog.sartek.net
