Why We All Have A Role in Congo's Conflict
Posted by Enough Team on Nov 01, 2011
Editor's Note: Actress and activist Robin Wright recently traveled to
eastern Congo with the Enough Project. Her op-ed reflecting on the
trip and what advocates in the United States can do to promote peace
originally appeared on Time.com.


Imagine your 15-year-old daughter walking to the corner store to get a
carton of milk. She has walked along this street nearly every day
growing up. But this afternoon on the way home, a group of men pull
her into the bushes. Each man takes a turn raping her, the last one
with the barrel of his AK-47. Left bleeding and unable to walk, she
takes shelter in the nearby forest. Why doesn’t she go home, you ask?
She can’t. The rape is considered her fault. She is now disowned by
her family. After surviving weeks on berries and sugar cane she is
discovered by a man who thought he smelled a rotting corpse. But the
stench is the result of a rape so brutal that the passageway between
her vagina and anus broke down, becoming one gaping wound.

In the Democratic Republic of Congo, which I visited in August,
horrific stories like this are happening on a daily basis. Armed
militias and the Congolese army are waging a war that spans more than
a decade, fueled in large part by the trade in minerals that are used
in cell phones, laptops and digital cameras. At a dingy hospital in
the town of Goma, a counselor told me that three women a day come to
the hospital to report being raped and receive treatment. According to
an International Rescue Committee survey, 5.4 million people have died
because of the conflict and humanitarian crisis — and that often-cited
figure is from 2007.

A simple, baseline expectation of security — the feeling that
“everything will work out” that we in the United States inherently,
optimistically turn to when a situation looks threatening — doesn’t
even apply in Congo. There is no 911 to call if a group of drunken
soldiers or militia burst through your front door, or you hear them
breaking into your neighbor’s home. There is no rape hotline or
Planned Parenthood and barely a semblance of a justice system to turn
to if your grandmother, mother, father, sister, brother, daughter or
infant is raped.

Mass atrocities are taking place all over the world, all the time;
human-rights abuses occur here in our own country. So why focus on
Congo? Because even apart from the unacceptable brutality endured by
women and the scale — the deadliest conflict since World War II —
Congo’s war is an accountability issue for all of us. As consumers of
the electronics products each and every one of us use on a daily basis
which contain the valuable minerals that pay for the guns so the
militia members can continue fighting, we have an obligation to follow
up and ensure that our purchases are not perpetuating the conflict.

Last year, the U.S. Congress passed landmark legislation — part of the
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act — that will
require U.S. companies involved in the minerals trade in eastern Congo
to publicly declare the steps they are taking to ensure their business
does not support the armed groups who profit from Congo’s insecurity.
Based on this public reporting, consumers and investors will be able
to choose to give their business to companies that are conscientious
about working with conflict-free mines.

The conflict minerals legislation adopted by Congress is part of the
solution. But powerful industry associations and their lobbyists are
trying to weaken the regulations the bill called for, suddenly,
disingenuously presenting themselves as advocates for the Congolese
people. The final regulations will likely be released in December.
Some industry associations and a handful of companies are likely to
take their battle to the courts in an effort to block the law from
taking effect.

In truth, corruption and a fight for power at every level is what
underpins this conflict. It is what motivates a mining executive to
say that he is working for the well-being of his miners, who labor
under backbreaking conditions to make around $5 a week. Or the army
commander who charges a “tax” at a roadblock manned by heavily armed
men. Or the soldier or militia fighter who violently rape a woman to
usurp her power, knowing that women are the centerpiece of society.

Two years, almost to the day, of my visit to eastern Congo, Secretary
of State Hillary Clinton visited one of the same towns. She met many
of the same people and was moved by some of the same stories. Nearly
everyone I met asked me to take a message back to “Mama Clinton,” to
urge her to make good on her promise to bring high-level U.S.
attention to the crisis in Congo. With the conflict minerals
legislation — our best hope for sparking change in the course of this
long war — at risk of being derailed, now is the time.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob?hl=en.

Reply via email to