National Parliamentarians Divided Over Auditor’s Report
A heated debate rocked the South Sudan National Assembly on Wednesday
when the Public Accounts Committee presented its work on the Auditor’s
report of the financial years 2005/6 to the members leaving them
devided in camps.13 January 2012
The South Sudan National Assembly premises in Juba [©Gurtong]By Waakhe
Simon Wudu
JUBA, 13th January 2012 [Gurtong] – A heated debate rocked the South
Sudan National Assembly on Wednesday when the Public Accounts
Committee presented its work on the Auditor’s report of the financial
years 2005/6 to the members leaving them devided in camps.

After presentation by the Public Accounts Committee Chairperson Hon.
Kom Kom Geng, the House Speaker Hon. James Wani Igga urged the
legislators to debate on the Committee’s work.

After three hours of a heated debate in the House, the legislators
were divided into two camps; National Ministers faction and other
legislators.

The sensitive debate left the two camps accusing each another over
accountability issues. The (Members of Parliament) MPs Camp preferred
life imprisonment and confiscation of property of those who will be
found guilty of squandering the public resources and defined them as
“looters”.

Thomas Wani Kundu of the SPLM party, an MP representing Lainya County
of Central Equatoria State called for the life imprisonment and
confiscation of the property of those who will be found guilty.

Meanwhile, Hon. John Luk Jok, the Minister of Justice and the
government legal advisor received criticisms from most members in what
they termed as interference to the open debate and obstructing the
members from free deliberations on the Auditor’s report.

 Mr. John Luk promised not to prosecute any person found guilty of
squandering the public resources on the grounds that, the Auditor’s
report was not comprehensive since they dint include audited parts of
the executive (Presidency and the Judiciary)

Luk commented that, “let us not be emotional but read the report and
base our debates on facts from the reports. The Auditor’s report is
not comprehensive; it should have covered all the government
institutions if justice is to prevail.”

 However, Hon. Wani Igga later ruled out John Luk’s threats and said
his Ministry will stand to play a role on the report if the Assembly
comes up with a decision.

The outspoken SPLM youth Chairperson Mr. Akol Paul Kordit warned the
speakers during the debate who defensively spoke against facts on the
reports.

“Here there are two things; corruption and justice. So you are either
with corruption or justice. I cannot speak zero tolerance on
corruption during my rallies because I feel ashamed,” Akol Paul Kordit
said.

“We really have to make a u-turn on this issue of corruption. I would
suggest this report to be referred to the South Sudan Anti Corruption
Commission, (SSACC) that was given powers to investigate and prosecute
the corrupt persons,” Akol stressed followed by a roar of applause
from almost all corners of the House.

He further recommended publishing of names of the corrupt officials if
found guilty against the published names of the martyrs in South Sudan
as a way of ashaming officials and fighting to end the vice.

Prior to John Luk’s commends, Mr. Kuoch K. Makwech urged the House
Speaker not to allow the Ministers to speak first in any debate
before the legislators, because they obstruct deliberations and
contradict ideas.

The endless debate was adjourned to Monday next week by the Speaker
saying that, resolutions to the reports shouldn’t be rushed.

On November 1st 2011, the South Sudan Auditor General Mr. Stephen
Wondu presented the government accounts audit reports of the years
2005 and 2006. The reports were based on six main key items where
government public funds mainly are used; oil revenues, payroll
expenditure, capital expenditure, bank and cash balances.

House members were shocked while others shade tears when the Auditor
General made the presentation. Besides the 2005 financial report, the
2006 report indicates that $1.3billion US Dollars were embezzled and
the government should account for it.

Posted in: Home, Parliaments
CommentsThere are currently no comments, be the first to post one.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob?hl=en.

Reply via email to