Former LRA Fighter Kwoyelo Remains in Prison as Court Date Passes
Posted by Tendai Zvogbo on Jan 18, 2012

The legal quagmire of Thomas Kwoyelo remained unresolved and the
former Lord’s Resistance Army rebel remained in prison last week when
the court date to decide whether he would receive amnesty came and
went. Justice Vincent Zehurikirize was scheduled to preside over
Kwoyelo’s trial, which would rule on Kwoyelo’s application to compel
the Directorate of Public Prosecutions, or DPP, and the Amnesty
Commission to grant him amnesty and issue him with an amnesty
certificate per an earlier constitutional court ruling that Kwoyelo
was eligible for amnesty. Last week’s court date passed without
convening because of a scheduling conflict, drawing out a case that
began in October 2010 and last September appeared to conclude.

Thomas Kwoyelo was kidnapped by the infamous LRA at the age of 13, and
he rose within the ranks of the LRA, committing human rights
violations in the process. He is the first former LRA rebel to stand
trial. Kwoyelo was charged with 53 counts of murder and various other
crimes. He applied for amnesty through the contentious Amnesty Act of
2000. To date, close to 13,000 LRA members have been granted amnesty
through this law. Kwoyelo’s renunciation of the rebellion rendered him
eligible for amnesty under the act. However, he has not been afforded
the same legal protections as his former comrades. Though Uganda’s
constitutional court ruled in favor of his release in September, the
government disregarded the decision as it cited that Kwoyelo had
committed other crimes and subsequently was ineligible for amnesty.
The Director of Public Prosecutions, or DPP, highlighted in his
closing statement before the constitutional court last year that in
addition to being charged with kidnapping with the intention to
murder, Kwoyelo had also been charged with murder contrary to
provisions 188 and 189 of the Penal Code. The DPP concluded that
Kwoyelo was to remain incarcerated.

Kwoyelo’s case exemplifies the tension between restorative justice and
Uganda’s international obligations pertaining to human rights. It also
underscores the inconsistency in Uganda’s approach to dealing with
former members of the LRA. An irregularity of this kind compromises
any transparency that was associated with the amnesty process and
could therefore undermine efforts to promote the defections of current
LRA commanders and fighters. Furthermore, it could result in social
costs as society develops the perception that former LRA members who
attained amnesty for committing similar crimes as Kwoyelo deserve
punishment. The government paved the way for such sentiments when it
suggested that because amnesty was contrary to certain constitutional
provisions, the pardon of former LRA rebels was erroneous.

Kwoyelo’s lawyer, Caleb Alaka, has argued that the continued
imprisonment of his client and the failure to issue an amnesty
certificate to Kwoyelo violates the constitutional court ruling of
September 22 that granted him amnesty. Additionally, he noted that
this undermined the equal protection clause, which provides Ugandans
with equal protection under the law. He said the treatment against his
client was discriminatory because former rebels successfully attained
amnesty under the Amnesty Act.. The complications with this case
perhaps signals a departure in Uganda from an amnesty process which
has been instrumental in giving former LRA rebels a new start in
Ugandan society. The resolution of this case will establish a
precedent concerning former LRA leaders. Hopefully, that precedent
will not undermine the integrity of a judicial process oriented toward
meeting the needs of LRA survivors in Uganda.

The verdict on Kwoyelo’s trial is expected this week.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob?hl=en.

Reply via email to