South Sudan shutdown of oil production not wise
* Article
* Comments (14)
email Email
print Print
pdfSave
separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation
*
*
*
*
By Steve Paterno
January 22, 2012 — South Sudanese leaders are always accustomed to
blaming the Northern Sudanese rulers and in the process forgetting
their own responsibilities and faults. However, they will not continue
to shift the blames as they will be demanded to own up to their
responsibilities. For the last six years, South Sudan has been relying
entirely on oil revenue for its budgetary needs. Nonetheless, no one
South Sudanese leader bothered to push for investment in the oil
industry, which is actually the only source of revenue. Instead, much
of this oil money is squandered through rampant corruption, shady
contract deals, and gross mismanagement.
When South Sudan obtained its independence last July, the new state
found itself with only oil wells, but nothing else. The oil refineries
are laying in the North. The pipelines for transporting the oil to the
world market cross through the North. Oil workers with the most
expertise who are Northerners, decamped. The few South Sudanese
workers who are left behind can hardly cope up with the workload. Even
their basic necessity such as food rations, which were supplied to
them from the North are now dwindling. This resulted into a drastic
reduction of South Sudanese oil output for the last several months.
Knowing too well that South Sudan is facing such serious dilemma,
Sudan government and oil companies resorted into blackmailing and
extorting South Sudan to paying huge and unreasonable charged fees for
facilities and land usage. Since then, both South Sudan and Sudan
could not agree on the amount. Faced with the standoff, Sudan
unilaterally enacted a legislation, legally empowering its ministry of
energy to confiscate South Sudanese oil as it deems necessary so as to
compensate for what Sudan considers to be the charges.
This unilateral move compels South Sudan to plan for the shutdown of
all its oil production, while it seeks alternative transportation
routes. Even though the shutdown will deny Sudan certain percentage of
revenues, it actually adversely affects South Sudan more. For Sudan,
South Sudan is calling a bluff, since it has no alternatives, at least
in the foreseeable future. So, Khartoum lies and wait for South Sudan
to come running back. The compounding challenges facing South Sudan
are quite enormous.
First, South Sudan is depending almost a hundred percent on oil
revenue. The country cannot afford to survive without the oil revenue.
To make matters worse, a bulk of South Sudanese budget is spent on
salaries. This will mean even a minor halt or adjustment in oil
revenue generation can negatively reflects on the employees who expect
their salaries on monthly basis.
Second, South Sudan can never be able to switch quickly from an oil
revenue base economy into another source of revenue generating
economy. The taxation system which is supposed to be an alternative
and is estimated in billions is in state of disarray. Few well placed
individuals are actually pocketing the collected tax revenues, while
the other potentially taxable sources are untouched. Agriculture,
which is a quintessential for South Sudanese livelihood and would have
been great source of revenue is left in waste. South Sudanese import
their food from their neighboring countries, including from the Sudan.
Very soon, with the lost of oil revenue, many people, especially the
salaried employees will have no more money to purchase those expensive
imported food. With the world financial crunch, international
donations are hardly coming in. Besides, those international aids come
with strings attached, the conditions that South Sudan can barely
meet, since it has no system for accountability. The only readily
available option for South Sudan for a financial rescued package are
loans. But why spend and even squander the money you don’t have, which
will create huge burden to the South Sudanese posterity and hinder the
potential for future growth.
Third, for South Sudan to seek alternative routes for transporting its
oil for sale, it is rather a long term plan, not a quick fix to the
current crisis the country is facing. First of all, if there is such a
plan of constructing a pipeline or building a railroad, it must
address the current issues as well as considering all the future
implications of such a plan. Secondly, the plan will require enormous
amount of time from the day it is envisioned to the day it is
finalized and ready to be operational. Thirdly, this plan will cost a
substantial amount of money—the money South Sudan is losing currently
through lost of oil revenue, corruption, and mismanagement.
Let the South Sudanese leaders be realistic on handling this crisis by
embarking on practical solutions than trying to be sentimental. Just
last December South Sudanese Vice President Riek Machar announced a
grandiose plan of making South Sudan the ’hub’ of seaports shipments
in Africa, connected by highways, railroads, airports and the likes.
This fantasized plan, which sounds more like a joke, is coming from a
leader of a country that cannot even transport its own oil—the oil
that the country feeds on—a clear indication that some of these South
Sudanese leaders are totally out of sync with the reality. In this
case, the notion of prioritization is replaced with romanticized
ideas.
What South Sudan needs now is not some absurd and baloney plans, but
rather a political will and negotiating skills to strike a quick deal
with Sudan on an interim basis. Such an agreement should not be
permanent. It must be subject to renewal within a given short period
of time, while the negotiations between the two countries continue
until a permanent agreeable solution is found. This is the only viable
alternative that can guarantee South Sudan continuous flow of revenue
as oppose to the total shutdown of the only source of revenue. As
South Sudan is pursuing alternative routes for transporting its oil,
it must ensure proper management of its finances by clambering down on
corruption and making sound investments along the way. The country
must then simultaneously seek ways to diversify its economy so as to
avoid over reliance on oil as the only source of revenue. After all,
the oil is not going to be there forever. With that said, South Sudan
has more to lose under the current prevailing situation.
Steve Paterno is the author of The Rev. Fr. Saturnino Lohure, A Romain
Catholic Priest Turned Rebel. He can be reached at
[email protected]
The views expressed in the 'Comment and Analysis' section are solely
the opinions of the writers. The veracity of any claims made are the
responsibility of the author not Sudan Tribune.
If you want to submit an opinion piece or an analysis please email it
to [email protected]
Sudan Tribune reserves the right to edit articles before publication.
Please include your full name, relevant personal information and
political affiliations.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob?hl=en.
