Something Dreadfully Wrong With "National Security" Which Instils Fear
in Citizens!
"With the exception of reasonable force to preserve life or in self
defence, the army and the police should never, ever harm anyone. Full
stop. Not even the worst of thieving, murdering, raping criminals."
17 February 2012 By Awak Bior

"Every single south Sudanese person I know, myself included..."

This common phrase which I hear all the time often refers to the
suffering of war common to all South Sudanese people. Be it as a
refugee, internally displaced or on the battle fields, no South
Sudanese person can say that their lives have been untouched by the
country's painfully long and violent history.

At a time of dire multiple threats to the nation’s very foundations,
one reflects upon the changes which have taken place since the
incomprehensibly difficult and unsteady days in 2005 when the
Government of South Sudan was formed. The Government came into being
with a bold and dazzling vision to lead a determined people to a
stable and cooperative autonomy within the Republic of Sudan or into a
secure, thriving and independent nation. This independence was not
gained without enormous struggle and I still recall that at the same
time last year in 2011, when the people’s will had been undeniably
expressed through a peaceful and well managed vote, people still
feared and doubted that their will would be honoured by detractors in
Khartoum and elsewhere. My response to the constant pessimism was to
always list the seemingly insurmountable obstacles already overcome by
South Sudan’s leadership and her supporters. I repeatedly pointed out
the many successes which had been labelled failures before pen could
even be put to paper. I grew to abhor the meaningless buzz phrase
“pre-failed state”.

Looking back we know that the plan to establish and secure autonomous
governance over South Sudan was no easy task – the pessimism,
particularly from external parties, was suffocating – yet over the
years we have seen the Government growing and the nation moving on a
slow but upward march to realise the hopes of the South Sudanese
people. Plans have been made to ensure service delivery and the
implementation of such plans is taking the nation forward, albeit at a
slower pace than optimistically wished for. Progress nonetheless. It
has not been easy and we know fine well that it will not get any
easier for some time to come.

I do however remain encouraged because I have had the personal and
enlightening privilege of working closely with South Sudan’s rule of
law institutions to support their development together with their
partners. On a day to day basis I see people working hard to effect
change. Notably I have worked very closely and at all levels with the
Ministry of Justice and the Judiciary of South Sudan. I have also had
the pleasure of working with and liaising with the National Assembly,
the South Sudan Police Service, the Prison Service, the SPLA and
various commissions. Almost without exception I have been inspired and
humbled by the men and women I have met and worked with and it is
their dedication and vision to develop their institutions that steers
and guides me in my work. Knowing the people of these institutions,
their hopes, their daily challenges and seeing positive change begin
to manifest not only gives me the energy to push on but, as an
individual, makes me believe in the Government of South Sudan.

When I speak with these officials about my experiences of service
delivery from their institutions (both the good and the bad) – from
top to bottom and across – I know that each person is fighting a
mighty battle for the nation through their respective areas of work. I
am reassured that these men and women care and that they are doing
their best to make this nation safe, just and secure for all who place
their futures and those of their children in South Sudan. And yet
amongst all this bounty of collaborative ideas and hard work there is
an unsettling undercurrent that leaves me afraid.

In recent weeks, since the horrific beating of a senior South Sudanese
government official by uniformed individuals from the national army,
this phrase “every single South Sudanese person I know, myself
included” has increasingly come to refer to the countless South
Sudanese people who have experienced some kind of assault or
altercation with the nation's police or army. In every instance
recounted in private circles victims have been helpless in their
ability to understand why it happened to them, or indeed to anyone
else. Few have made complaints or spoken publicly about their
experience. Those who do are offered no redress; at best a quietly
whispered apology, at worst the blame shifted to question what they
did to deserve the slap, push or punch... Everyone is talking about
their experiences with more frequency and urgency than ever before.
Everyone is telling their story and wondering: what is going on?

Something is terribly wrong when a heartbreaking phrase about profound
collective human suffering can be applied to another form of human
suffering, one for which there is never any justification or any noble
cause, such as the liberation of a suffering people from state
oppression. With the exception of reasonable force to preserve life or
in self defence, the army and the police should never, ever harm
anyone. Full stop. Not even the worst of thieving, murdering, raping
criminals.

A snippet from the vision from South Sudan’s Development Plan, as
recently reiterated by the nation's President His Excellency Salva
Kiir Mayardit at the conference on international engagement in
Washington D.C is that South Sudan is  a "compassionate and tolerant;
free, just and peaceful; democratic and accountable; safe, secure"
country. For this to become true the terrible abuses being described
would not be commonplace and people would feel confident that
perpetrators would be dealt with according to the law. In his address
His Excellency the President expressed confidence that this vision
could be realised. Clearly for South Sudan to get to where she wants
to be, where her leaders seek to take her and where her people so
desperately need her to go, the emerging narrative of daily abuses is
just not acceptable. Few would disagree. There are simply no
exceptions to allow anyone to act as summary judge and executioner,
often for incidents that do not even constitute a crime or security
risk.

So how is it that almost every South Sudanese person has a story to
tell of a push, a slap, a punch or a bruise-making, blood-letting
severe beating from security forces? Stories that date not more than a
few years, since the signing of the Peace Agreement. Stories that have
not diminished in horror and frequency since the Republic of South
Sudan's independence from her oppressors in Khartoum. How is it
possible?


Impunity. A word I first came to know so intimately whilst practising
as a lawyer representing clients fleeing from countries where
uniformed government forces from the police to the army proactively
oppressed and mentally and physically harmed citizens. Throughout my
years of legal practice I heard hundreds of stories from men, women
and even children whose horrific experiences and the torment they had
endured were simply unfathomable. Stories which were barely believable
to me until I had heard too many of them to deny their veracity. Not
until I had delved into the histories of the people and their
countries of origin and read too many accounts from various
independent sources did I believe that such things existed in the
world. The gravity and pain of suffering told by my former clients
struck me hard and many years on, their stories have never left me. It
is too much to believe that this ugly word – impunity – is
increasingly being applied to South Sudan, a place where so many hopes
and dreams have been lost yet so much resilience remains, hinged upon
millions of new hopes and dreams yet to be realised.


Like our collective silence, this word - impunity - is quietly working
its way into South Sudan's narrative. This at a time of relative peace
and long awaited freedom. The storyline is being written on the world
stage as we remain silent. A quick look on the Internet or a few
conversations with international friends of South Sudan - who for
years have stood and continue to stand firm in support of the country
- reveal that a perceived growing threat to the new country is the
lack of accountability and increasing frequency of abuses by the
security forces. Perceptions do not create themselves but rather they
reflect the reality of a situation, even as it unfolds before our very
eyes. This issue is not only destroying people's bodies, needlessly
taking people's lives but it is also destroying people's souls and
devastating the already fragile soul of a nation that has not even
reached its first year anniversary of liberation.

With our silence we diminish the memories of those who died as a
direct result of the war as well as those who suffered and died before
they could see peace and the dream of an independent nation of South
Sudan. Furthermore, with our silence we are allowing the honour of the
many good men and women who now dedicate their lives to the service
and protection of South Sudan to decay.

South Sudan's people don't just need and deserve basic services. More
than anything they urgently need the simple freedom of personal
security, to be free from fear and to feel safe going about their
lawful business in their own country. They require personal dignity
and pride in the nation they voted into being. This begins with having
confidence in those tasked with serving and protecting people, namely
the army and the police, including the secret police. It requires that
instead of demanding fear, the uniform commands respect and admiration
for men and women evidently doing very difficult work under very
challenging professional and personal circumstances.

Let us remember that every single South Sudanese person knows and
loves someone who works for one of these public security institutions.
Everyone also knows and loves someone who has been physically
assaulted by a public security official. Directly or indirectly, this
perverse reality is affecting us all, every single day.

If pretty much every single south Sudanese person has suffered a
variation of the unacceptable and distressing indignity of being
abused by security forces then why the silence? Why do we whisper and
discuss our experiences quietly amongst family and friends? Is it that
we are afraid? Or are we passive participants, observing what many
consider to be an accelerating decline and a bad omen for the new
nation? In either case, whether fear or passivity, we need to ask
ourselves; at what cost do we remain silent?

"The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good people to do
nothing."
I do not for a second believe that the army or the police forces are
simply bad institutions full of bad people. Nor do I believe that
there is a bunch of good people running the security forces and
sitting around doing nothing. If this were the case then we may as
well all give up on South Sudan because these institutions are the
Government's biggest investment and greatest asset, particularly given
the many challenges and dangers South Sudan faces today. The nation is
on high alert and its security forces are fighting fires on multiple
fronts. We are talking about the backbone of the nation upon whom
every other need for development and progress relies. It just won't do
for these institutions to be a liability to South Sudan and her
people.

In fact there are some stories where soldiers and police officers have
stopped colleagues from violent outbursts against the public. I myself
have been assaulted by security personnel and at other times have been
protected by individual officers from the unreasonable excesses of
their own colleagues. Good people are doing good things but somehow
it’s not enough to counterbalance the stories of abuses by security
forces. Quite likely it is a handful of uniformed men and women who so
grossly neglect their national duty and obligation to the public. So
again one asks, why then does it affect every single South Sudanese
person? Not to mention the country's many needed and wanted guests
from abroad, the majority of whom also have terrible stories to tell.

The answer is twofold: firstly, a "handful" of soldiers and police
officers in South Sudan is a very generous handful. The army alone is
estimated to have 180,000 serving soldiers. It is near impossible to
go a day anywhere in South Sudan without seeing or interacting with a
soldier or police officer, as a family member or friend or as a
professional on duty. The percentage of perpetrators may be small but
from such large institutions perhaps a football pitch full might be
more accurate. The impact of the minority is adversely affecting the
majority. The second reason such abuses affect so many people is that
those who commit abuses do it simply because they can. Again and again
they do. And time after time there are no known consequences for their
actions.

There is a fine, barely visible line to distinguish between
acquiescence and permission. If there are few or no consequences of
note when a uniformed official does the unthinkable then it makes the
unthinkable okay. Government needs to speak out publicly, repeatedly
and loudly and tell the people that it does not condone any abuse of
power committed by those in its service. The issue is not that nothing
is being done but perhaps that what is being done is not having the
much desired effect of putting an end to the abuses. As recently as
December 2011 the Inspector General of Police General Tito Achuil
Madut told Radio Miraya that he wanted the public to know the
following:

"[...] the actions of a few individuals should not tarnish the image
of the entire police force. The police will work to protect the people
and we need their cooperation to weed out the anti-social elements
from the community. We will work together and the bad name of the
police will change. We are saying that the police are being trained to
be accountable to the law and to the people."

Similar statements of sincere good intent have been made by prominent
senior officers in South Sudan's national army and elsewhere
throughout Government. It is clear that the South Sudan leadership is
aware of such abuses and roundly condemns them. But there is a missing
link between the words and aspirations of the leaders and the
experiences of the people. That link is the apparent failure of
justice. For words to matter there must be action. Following the
common law adage that not only must justice be done it must also be
seen to be done, the action taken against perpetrators must be known
to the public.

To date the severe beating of a senior official from the Government
appears to have had no obvious or known consequence for the
perpetrators so how can the rest of us expect or hope to seek redress
should we fall victim to rogue officials? In the United Kingdom one of
the ways the police has built public confidence over the years is to
record and publicly report crime rates and to work with the Crown
Prosecution Service and the media to show the public what action is
taken against criminals. This approach extends to the reporting of
wrong doing by police officers, soldiers and other public officials
from whom a higher standard of propriety is expected. The approach
serves to encourage people to seek protection and redress from the
government as well as acting as a deterrent to those who would flout
the law.

Victims must feel free to complain to the Government of South Sudan
and to speak publicly without fear or criticism. Investigations and
prosecutions must take place. Witnesses must feel confident and safe
enough to come forward. Courts - both military and civilian - must be
enabled to deal with such cases as a priority and to sentence
perpetrators accordingly. Journalists must be free – in accordance
with internationally recognised standards on press freedoms and
responsibilities - to report incidents and the outcome of
investigations and prosecutions to the public. Only then can justice
be seen to be done.

The good men and women responsible for our security forces need to
again (and again) tell the people that all abuses of power and
authority are unacceptable, that they are ready and willing to hear,
take seriously and deal with any reports of abuses made by
individuals. Lastly, although a public apology to those who have
suffered at the hands of uniformed officials would not go amiss, what
is really needed is public recognition that this problem exists and
that it affects everyone, that it is unacceptable and that it must
stop. Every single South Sudanese person I know has suffered enough in
myriad ways. Exhaustion prevails yet there remains a tangible energy,
a determination and an optimism to bravely face the future and to
stand together and to support the country's leaders and security
forces to tackle the undoubtedly difficult years ahead. Nationalism
remains strong but it is a two way thing, threatened only by our
collective silence on the critical issues that affect us all.

END


Posted in: Opinions

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob?hl=en.

Reply via email to