----------
Sent from my Nokia phone

------Original message------
From: PlusNews <[email protected]>
To: "Elisabeth Janaina" <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, May 9, 2012 5:53:51 AM GMT-0000
Subject: RWANDA: Substantial HIV funding has not hurt other patient care

RWANDA: Substantial HIV funding has not hurt other patient care 

NAIROBI, 8 May 2012 (PLUSNEWS) - The large amount of donor funding that has 
gone into Rwanda's fight against HIV has not affected efforts to prevent and 
treat unrelated diseases, such as malaria and measles, and may in fact have 
improved overall healthcare, a six-year study has found. 

Researchers at Brandeis University in the US compared the performance of health 
clinics providing HIV services with those that did not by collecting data on 
the number of vaccines administered, visits to register child growth, and 
non-HIV/AIDS hospitalizations to monitor the attention given to non-HIV health 
issues. 

"We wanted to examine how AIDS funding interacts with the rest of the health 
sector in Rwanda," Dr Donald Shepard, a professor at the Schneider Institute 
for Health Policy at Brandeis and the study's lead author, told IRIN/PlusNews. 
"There are conflicting views - some thought AIDS funding impacted the wider 
health system favourably, while others thought it worked the other way." 

The fight against HIV has been the one of the best-funded health issues in 
recent times. A study in 2009 by the UN World Health Organization (WHO) [ 
http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/87/12/08-058677/en/index.html ] found that 
funding for HIV/AIDS accounted for almost one-third of total health overseas 
development assistance between 2002 and 2006. 

There has been a backlash [ 
http://www.plusnews.org/Report/79325/GLOBAL-Is-AIDS-still-an-emergency ] 
against the large amount spent on AIDS, with critics suggesting that funding 
for HIV is disproportionate to the global disease burden and is using vital 
resources that could be spent on other diseases. 

The proponents of AIDS funding argue that the devastating impact of HIV 
justifies the high funding to fight the disease, and that the money has been 
used to strengthen health systems through improvements in infrastructure and 
functioning. The authors felt that Rwanda was a good case study because it has 
received strong HIV funding and has been used to support arguments on both 
sides. 

"What we found in Rwanda was that large amounts of AIDS funding had not had an 
adverse impact, as some feared - there is no evidence that it detracted from 
the rest of the health system," Shepard said. "On the contrary, the evidence 
suggests that the benefits have spun off into the rest of the health system. In 
health centres providing HIV services, for example, BCG [Bacillus 
Calmette-Guérin, a vaccine against tuberculosis] vaccinations increased at a 
higher rate than at those health centres that didn't provide HIV services." 

The authors found that while there were neither "prominent diversions nor 
enhancement effects" after introducing HIV services to health centres, there 
was evidence that the health centres offering HIV services provided better 
preventive care than those that did not, including better immunization 
programmes. 

According to Shepard, the fact that AIDS funding had been able to work well 
within the wider health system was no accident, but the result of a deliberate 
policy by the Rwandan government. "Rwanda made a thoughtful effort to integrate 
AIDS services into the general health system - staff who treated HIV patients 
also treated other patients, and systems set up using HIV funds supported other 
health issues in a systematic way," he said. 

Rwanda's community-based health insurance, known as Mutuelle, [ 
http://www.moh.gov.rw/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=294:more-than-80-percent-pay-up-for-mutuelle-de-sante&catid=1:latest-news&Itemid=2
 ] and its performance-based financing for health centres, contributed 
significantly to the overall smooth and efficient running of the health system. 

Shepard noted that the findings, while specific to Rwanda, meant that donors 
should continue their funding for HIV. 

He suggested that "Other countries should look at Rwanda and adapt its systems 
to their own settings, using funding for HIV to broadly support the health 
system and strengthen the response to other diseases." 

kr/he 
[END]

This report online: http://www.plusnews.org/report.aspx?reportID=95428



Follow us on Twitter! http://twitter.com/plusnews

© IRIN. All rights reserved. HIV/AIDS news and analysis: 
http://www.plusnews.org/

[This item comes to you from PlusNews, part of IRIN, the humanitarian news and 
analysis service of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. 
The opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the United Nations 
or its Member States. Reposting or reproduction, with attribution, for 
non-commercial purposes is permitted. Terms and conditions: 
http://www.irinnews.org/copyright

Principal IRIN/PlusNews donors: UAE, Canada, Germany, Ireland, Netherlands, 
Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, UK and the IHC. More information: 
http://www.irinnews.org/donors

This mail is from an automatic address. Contact PlusNews at: 
[email protected]. Revise/stop your subscription: http://bit.ly/9nCoUP ]

Subscribed email: [email protected]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob?hl=en.

Reply via email to