South Sudan after Paanthou crisis

By Steve Paterno

May 13, 2012 — Diplomatically, when the Paanthou crisis occurred,
South Sudan found itself unprepared and underrepresented in the
diplomatic front. The diplomatic ferocity of its opponent in Khartoum
to spread propaganda was never been equally matched. Just overnight,
the newly emerged country found itself almost isolated
internationally, for acting rightly in self defense. The barrage of
condemnations against South Sudan came from even close allies and
friends such as the USA.

As a result, South Sudan had to resort into drastic measures. The
nation made a painful decision just to please the international
community by immediately ordering the pulling out of its troops from
Paanthou, an area that belongs to South Sudan but claimed by Khartoum,
because of its oil wealth. To further compromise and heed to the
international community call, South Sudan even went out of its way by
doing more than its share of responsibility, when it decided to
withdraw its police forces from Abyei area, leaving the civilians
basically vulnerable under the mercy of cruel Khartoum armed forces.

To make up for its diplomatic gap, South Sudan dispatched high level
official delegation into foreign capitals to plea for South Sudan
case. This then followed by deployments of South Sudanese ambassadors
to strategic countries and international organizations. South Sudan is
now in a bit better shape to make its case heard internationally,
which is really simple in a way. Actually, there is no moral
equivalent between Juba and Khartoum so as to level the competition.
Khartoum is ruled like how the criminals run the streets of crime hit
cities in the West. The government in Khartoum is run by what the
Sudanese people locally refer to as mujirimin (thugs). Even the head
of the Khartoum regime, President Omar al-Bashir is an indicted
criminal and an international fugitive. The regime is killing its
people and causing problems with everyone else. The records are there
in abandon to speak for themselves.

Now that South Sudan has done more than its share of obligations, it
is the turn of international community to pressure the mujirimin in
Khartoum to act in accordance with international norms and demands.
Khartoum must be held to account for all the UN resolutions and other
agreements it unilaterally abrogate and continue to violate. This then
will pave the way for peaceful negotiations as it will place Juba and
Khartoum under equal footing, because as things currently stand, the
two are not equal in the world standing.

In order for a peaceful and genuine negotiations to take place, the
negotiations between South and North Sudan must be transferred under
the auspicious of Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD).
One begins to wonder how in the first place the negotiations between
South and North Sudan ended up under the African Union High Level
Implementation Panel (AUHIP), headed by a failed South African
politician Thabo Mbeki, a former South African president who could not
even secure the chairmanship position in his political party of
African National Congress (ANC), even though he was an anointed
president of the Republic of South Africa. The panel is not only
headed by a failed politician, but it has proven in its deed that it
is failing, since it has done it in Darfur and is now doing it in the
case of South Sudan. Sadly enough, this supposedly continental panel
includes consultants like Dr. Alex De Waal, an opportunist
masquerading as scholar and expert on Sudan. The following two
articles (Alex De Waal and Darfur Genocide Question and Alex De Waal
response by proxy on Darfur genocide question), written by this author
is enough to portray an accurate picture and motives of Dr. Alex De
Waal in his involvement in Sudanese affairs. In short, (AUHIP) appears
more of a dumping ground for employment accommodations awarded to
African failed politicians such as Thabo Mbeki or the Western
opportunists, masquerading as experts, the likes of Dr. Alex De Waal.
No wonder right after the Paanthou crisis, Mbeki ran to the UN and
began to toe the line of Khartoum, by accusing South Sudan for
aggression. How can South Sudan a victim of constant belligerence
suddenly turned into an aggressor in a course of one night is still
baffling to those who follow issues in that region.

At any rate, the stakes involved is more higher than accommodations of
failed politicians and making the relevance of expertise of Western
opportunists. For that reason, the IGAD must immediately take over the
negotiations since the issues under negotiations are pertinent to
Comprehensive Peace Agreements (CPA), brokered by IGAD.

Otherwise, the easiest unilateral alternative for South Sudan is clear
as it is declared in South Sudan TV by a South Sudanese army general
deputy chief of staff Isaac Obuto Mamur that in case of a failed
political settlement, the South Sudanese army stands ready; starting
by demarcating the borders in African style of courage, honor, and
sacrifice. The declaration by the battle hardened General with the
body that sustains more bullet wounds than an African elephant can
withstand is of course not just a bravado pep talk to the troops. The
South Sudanese troops have just proven to their opponents in Khartoum
and the entire world that they can easily demarcate the borders if
they so wish to. So, that decision is currently pending under
political negotiations, while the South Sudanese troops reserve its
rights to demarcate the borders. The UN Security Council threats of
sanctions against the Republic of South Sudan has actually little
bearing on abilities, moral, and battle prowess of South Sudanese
troops—the generation of people who are driven by their desires for
freedom, justice, and equality.

Militarily

South Sudanese gallant forces, the SPLA has performed outstandingly as
they acted in self defense to chase Khartoum forces from Paanthou.
They sent Khartoum weak armed forces running, leaving behind scores of
dead bodies, all their belongings, and even some human souls that the
SPLA is able to preserve as prisoners of war (POW), in accordance with
Geneva Protocal of war. Simply put: SPLA incursion into Paanthou has
proven that Khartoum armed forces is not a competition in ground
combat in comparison to SPLA. Khartoum is still winning the air war
though, where South Sudan is lacking behind. This means, South Sudan
needs to upgrade its air defense capabilities so as to effectively
deal Khartoum a blow.

More importantly, South Sudan needs to manage and coordinate its
military operations against Khartoum jointly with Khartoum’s armed
oppositions, particularly the Sudan Revolutionary Front (SRF). The
opportunity of coordination has been missed during the incursion of
Paanthou, because the action was in response of self defense and
unplanned. However, with a better planning and strategy in
coordination with the other armed groups in the Republic of Sudan, an
incident similar to Paanthou scope, would have created a momentum that
will establish a life of its own in driving the Omar al-Bashir
thuggish regime out of power within just a shortest period of time.

Since, the coalition against Khartoum regime extends far and beyond,
South Sudan must capitalize on the momentum in making sure the
coalition stick and increase in size. Uganda already bravely came out
against Khartoum’s regime belligerence by declaring its readiness to
face Khartoum in its aggression, which it wages not just against South
Sudan but neighboring nations, such as supporting the Lord’s
Resistance Army (LRA) of Uganda.

Ironically, and by implications, the USA military is also involved in
this coalition war against Khartoum, despite the contradictions of
American administration public condemnation of South Sudan. In a
letter from US President Barack Obama to American Congress, dated
October 14, 2011, the America President revealed that he decided to
deployed American troops in central Africa to combat the LRA
atrocities. The troops are specifically deployed in areas affected by
LRA, Uganda, South Sudan, the Central African Republic, and the
Democratic Republic of the Congo. In a layman’s word, America decided
to fight the LRA, which actually means, fighting Khartoum—the force
behind LRA. Perhaps it is a high time that the South Sudan President
Salva Kiir pay a courtesy call across to American President Barack
Obama so as to have him explain the contradiction of trying to fight
the LRA, which is supported by Khartoum against South Sudan, and at
the same time condemning South Sudan for standing up against
Khartoum’s constant belligerence. So, if President Obama gives a lame
excuse for the contradiction of policy because of American election,
then he must have a courage to explain to any of the families of those
American combat forces fighting the LRA who are the real backer behind
the LRA, specially the provider of the weapons and bullets that will
kill these brave American soldiers during this combat operation.

Politically

The CPA was intended to transform the Sudan. Since the CPA was signed,
all the political forces, which are by the way oppose to the regime in
Khartoum with a vehement zeal, were looking for direction so as to
challenge the brutal dictatorship of National Congress Party (NCP) in
Khartoum. Since then, they never found a direction. Now there is an
opportunity for them to effectively deal with the thuggish regime in
Khartoum by looking for direction and leadership in the Republic of
South Sudan. Therefore, the Republic of South Sudan needs to call and
sponsor a conference of all Sudanese opposition groups to be held in
Juba. The conference goal should be the overthrow of the criminal
President Omar al-Bashir and his NCP regime, among other things.

In case the South Sudan government, the SPLM in particular has not
done it yet, they need to immediately establish contact and send
special invitation to come to Juba for the popular governor of Gadaref
state, Karamallah Abbas, who is bravely challenging the regime in
Khartoum. Governor Abbas is the first to challenge the marginalization
of the people of Gadaref by the regime in Khartoum, which led into his
ouster from power by the regime. Gadarif state is a rich agricultural
area, but yet the local people of the state go hungry despite the food
they produce. The awareness of marginalization orchestrated from
Khartoum is now spreading like cancer and South Sudan must lead in
creating the awareness.

Steve Paterno is the author of The Rev. Fr. Saturnino Lohure, A Romain
Catholic Priest Turned Rebel. He can be reached at
[email protected]


The views expressed in the 'Comment and Analysis' section are solely
the opinions of the writers. The veracity of any claims made are the
responsibility of the author not Sudan Tribune.

If you want to submit an opinion piece or an analysis please email it
to [email protected]

Sudan Tribune reserves the right to edit articles before publication.
Please include your full name, relevant personal information and
political affiliations.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob?hl=en.

Reply via email to