Understanding Australia’s Interest in South Sudan

"...two internationally read news outlets, explicitly described
Australia as an exploitative pseudo-imperialist nation with deep
selfish interests in South Sudan’s minerals sector. To a considerable
extent, this is not accurate."


 20 June 2012



By Peter Run

The recent visit to Juba by the Australian delegation headed by the
Honourable Tim Fischer (AC) has been badly reported in South Sudanese
press. In the Sudan Tribune, the headline was “Australia Urges
Transparency in South Sudan’s Mining Industry.”  This suggests
Australia has a significant involvement requiring accountability in
that industry when in fact it does not.

All available records show that Fischer was not calling for anything
at all. He was merely praising the veracity of the impending mining
legislation that South Sudan wants to put into place. The notion that
Australia urges South Sudan comes from Australia confirming that a
South Sudanese legislation looks like it will meet international
transparency standards, not the other way round.

On Gurtong Peace Trust’s website, the article declares: “Australia
Joins Scramble for South Sudan’s Oil.” Really? What evidence is there
to support that claim? I know that the cynics Australia’s
international assistance program like to erroneously claim that the
country’s interest in South Sudan is aimed at buying its vote for a
United Nations Security Council seat.

This has tended to cloud intelligent debates about Australia’s
involvement in Africa but as most South Sudanese know, Australia was
one of the first countries to put soldiers on the ground and
recognised South Sudan when it became independent. Given this
longstanding commitment, it is regrettable that South Sudanese
currently seem to misunderstand the key driving forces of Australia’s
interest in their country.

The overall coverage of the Australian delegation to Juba in
influential media, as represented by Sudan Tribune and Gurtong, two
internationally read news outlets, explicitly described Australia as
an exploitative pseudo-imperialist nation with deep selfish interests
in South Sudan’s minerals sector. To a considerable extent, this is
not accurate.

The purpose of the Australian delegation’s visit to Juba may have been
natural resources-centred but it did not stem from the scramble for
South Sudan’s oil nor does the Australian government have a deep
selfish interest in that country. As the articles point out, Australia
is a mining nation. Its wealth comes mostly from what we call “the
mining boom” down here. As such there is a limited compelling national
interest in South Sudan.

The pressure on the Australian government to engage with South Sudan
consistently comes from two sources. The loudest voice of these two is
the mining companies. These companies are not necessarily Australian.
However, they somehow succeed in making Australian politicians believe
that their interest is Australian interest, but that is something else
altogether.

The second voice, you will be surprised to hear, are South Sudanese in
Australia. According to the 2011 referendum, Australia has the largest
population of South Sudanese outside of Africa. Most of these people
have become citizens and are increasingly becoming an important
interest group in matters of Australia’s foreign policy towards
African countries.

Of course the South Sudanese population in Australia are not strong on
their own. They have since built networks of organisational and
personal relationships aimed at maintaining strong connections to both
South Sudan and Australia.

Both the governments of Australia and South Sudan are probably aware
of this development. I suspect it is one of the reasons South Sudan
appointed Mr. Mariano Deng Ngor, a former leader of South Sudanese
community in Australia, a man well loved in Australia’s African and
religious communities and respected by both liberal and conservative
politicians of the country.

To claim that Australia has a selfish ambition to extract South
Sudanese minerals is not only incorrect but also serves to negate the
hard work of South Sudanese like Mariano Deng Ngor who lobby reluctant
Australian governments to inject some capacity building into South
Sudan’s mining sector.



Peter Run teaches political science and international relations at the
University of Queensland in Brisbane, Australia.


 Posted in: Opinions

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob?hl=en-US.

Reply via email to