Kenyan Police Violence Victims Fight for Justice

 Government dragging its feet on court-ordered compensation for those
shot by police during 2007-8 unrest.

By Emmanuel Igunza - International Justice - ICC



ACR Issue 327,

16 Jul 12




Kenyans shot by police during months of post-election violence in
2007-08 are struggling to claim the compensation due to them.

Even though courts have directed the government to make the payouts,
the officials responsible are dragging their feet, saying they have
yet to receive authorisation to act.

Kenya descended into chaos in late 2007 and early 2008 following the
last presidential election, as violent clashes took place between
supporters of the Orange Democratic Movement and the Party of National
Unity. The two parties are now coalition partners in government.

Approximately 1,300 people were killed and 3,500 injured as fighting
erupted along ethnic lines. Dozens of civilians were shot by police in
the capital Nairobi and in the eastern town of Kisumu, and some have
been awarded compensation by the courts. (See Kenyan Police Criticised
Over Election Violence Cases on the slowness with which allegations
have been investigated.)
http://iwpr.net/report-news/kenyan-police-criticised-over-election-viole...

Peter Omari Ogenche was returning to his home in Nairobi’s Kibera slum
area when police from the Kilimani district opened fire, leaving a
bullet lodged in his spine.

Ogenche was left paralysed, and successfully sued the government for
damages. In October 2009, a court ruled that the government should pay
him 5.4 million Kenyan shillings, 60,000 US dollars – but he has yet
to see any of it.

“My life changed for the worse after the shooting,” Ogenche told IWPR.
“Because of being in a wheelchair, I could not work and consequently
my wife left me. Now I have to take care of my four children all by
myself. I feel bitter that the government has not paid me nearly five
years down the line, but I can only hope they will honour the court
ruling.”

Ogenche’s lawyer, Joseph Musomba, says he has handled 19
election-related cases in which the government has failed to pay
court-ordered compensation of over five million Kenyan shillings per
person.

According to the New York-Based advocacy group Human Rights Watch, the
government is yet to pay court-ordered compensation in at least 21
instances where victims of shootings during the post-election violence
have won civil lawsuits against the Kenyan police.

Human Rights Watch says the government’s reluctance to pay up is
indicative of Kenya’s failure to deliver justice in the wake of the
violence.

The government has failed to set up a court to try those involved in
and behind the bloodshed.

Four alleged key perpetrators of the violence are due to stand trial
at the International Criminal Court in The Hague next spring.

“Under international law, Kenya has an obligation to prosecute serious
international crimes, and all victims of such crimes have the right to
justice,” Daniel Bekele, Africa director at Human Rights Watch, said.

“Providing redress for post-election violence victims is a
requirement, not an option. Four years after the violence, victims
have been waiting for justice for far too long.”

MINISTRIES PLEAD LACK OF AUTHORITY AND CASH


The Ministry for Special Programmes, which is responsible for dealing
with the aftermath of the violence, says it has not been instructed to
set aside the compensation money, nor has it been directed by Kenya’s
attorney general, Githu Muigai, to pay the victims the compensation
they are owed.

"We are not aware of these cases, and even then, my ministry has not
received any monies for these purposes," minister Esther Murugi, told
IWPR.

The position taken by Murugi’s ministry is mirrored by that of the
interior ministry, which controls Kenya’s police force.

Assistant interior minister Orwa Ojode spoke to IWPR shortly before
his death in a helicopter crash last month.

“As of now, I have no money in my account from the treasury to pay out
to the victims. This unfortunately means there is probably no money
for them,” he said.

Ojode cited a legal procedure which means government ministries must
await direction from the attorney general before making any payments
on court orders of this kind. That go-ahead has not been given.

The victims’ claims to the money are being obstructed by a legal
provision. Section 21 of the Government Proceedings Act, a court
cannot force the government to execute a damages payment.

SUING GOVERNMENT TO MAKE IT PAY


Lawyer Musomba says he is currently exploring ways of forcing the
government to pay up, including petitioning the chief justice to
repeal sections of the Government Proceedings Act, so that courts
would be empowered to require the government to pay claimants.

“We are pursuing different avenues to see that justice is finally done
for the victims of these heinous acts,” he said.

As part of the same joint action, victims are pushing for the removal
of the current acting permanent secretary at the interior ministry,
Mutea Iringo, on the grounds that he has failed to comply with court
orders of damages.

The case is due to be heard in November this year, but Musomba is not
optimistic.

“This petition will be a breakthrough if it succeeds,” Musomba said.
“But experience shows the government always has impunity when it comes
to compensation. When enforcing a judgment against the government,
most of the time you run into walls.”

The Nairobi-based human rights lawyer, Paul Muite, agrees that suing
the permanent secretary is a path worth pursuing, although he warns it
will be a long and difficult process.

“There are no two ways about it. The permanent secretary, as the
accounting officer, in the [interior] ministry ought to take
responsibility for this long delay. He should have respected the
court’s decision,” says Muite.

IWPR contacted Iringo, but he declined to comment on these issues by
phone, and did not respond to emails on the subject.

Kenya’s chief justice, Willy Mutunga, has warned that permanent
secretaries and other government accounting officers who fail to
comply with court orders could face prosecution..

“The courts can jail the permanent secretary until the money is paid,
but this is a long route. A much easier option would be to talk
directly to the attorney general, and inform him of the specific court
decrees that have not been complied with and he will deal with them
and also shame the people who are defying court orders,” said Mutunga.

Mutunga defended the attorney general from claims that he has been
reluctant to order government departments to pay up.

“I know Githu Muigai is doing all he can to make sure the government
pays claims that are legitimate, because we know there are others that
are not legitimate, so he is challenging them in court,” he said.

Musomba said he was unaware that the attorney general was contesting
any of the compensation cases he was handling.

He said he had tried to contact the attorney general’s office on
numerous occasions, without success.

“It would be nice to get an audience with the attorney general or the
chief justice, but that is like trying to reach the president of this
country. It is not that simple, and time is moving fast,” Musomba
said.

IWPR was, however, able to speak to the attorney general, and asked
him about progress on the compensation awards.

Muigai would not be drawn on specific cases, but told IWPR that all
victims would receive justice.

“The government of Kenya remains committed that there should be
justice for the victims of the crimes that were committed in this
country,” he said.

Another avenue open to the claimants could be to send the cases to the
National Council for the Administration of Justice, a body that
oversees judicial processes in Kenya. The council is chaired by Chief
Justice Mutunga and includes the attorney general and the justice
minister.

Mutunga said he was willing to facilitate the process.

“If I get the names of all the victims in a formal petition, I can
take these cases to the National Council for the Administration of
Justice and ask the attorney general, the director of public
prosecutions and the justice minister to help in fast-tracking the
payments,” Chief Justice Mutunga said.

Former legislator and now human rights activist Njeru Kathangu says
that the damage awards are symptomatic of the of bureaucratic
obstructions that deter Kenyans from taking legal action against their
government.

He pointed to Kenya’s poor track record in this area, including cases
where victims of abuses committed when former president Daniel Arap
Moi was in power in the 1980s and 1990s have yet to receive damages
awarded in court rulings.

“It is no mean task suing the state. You need patience, resilience and
a lot of money. Some victims have died waiting to be paid,” he said.

Emmanuel Igunza is an IWPR-trained reporter in Nairobi.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to