6 Sudanese bombs landed in S. Sudan territory: UN team

July 24, 2012 (JUBA) - A United Nations report has confirmed that six
bombs, which Sudan claimed aimed at rebels within its own territory,
that Sudan said, were aimed at rebels within its own territory, indeed
landed in South Sudan areas, The Associated Press (AP) reported.
 A Sudanese army Antonov plane (Photo Amnesty International)
Details of the incident are reportedly contained in internal UN report
it allegedly obtained. A team of U.N. observers, according to report,
visited the site and found six bomb craters 1.16 kilometers inside
South Sudan’s territory.

At least one man said to have been wounded from the bombing reportedly
died later.

South Sudan last week announced it was pulling out of talks with Sudan
on the outstanding post-session issues, after it accused Sudan Armed
Forces (SAF) of aerially bombarding its border territories. Juba also
filed a complaint to the African Union Peace and Security Council and
the UN Security Council (UNSC) accusing Khartoum of bombarding three
locations in Northern Bhar el-Ghazal which borders South Darfur state.

Khartoum dismissed the accusations, saying that the Sudanese army
dealt with a convoy of 105 arms-laden vehicles belonging to Justice
for Equality Movement (JEM) when it crossed into Sudanese territories
from South Sudan. It further accused Juba of violating the provisions
of the UNSC resolution on cessation of support to rebels.

However, JEM in a statement extended to Sudan Tribune, vigorously
denied launching a ground attack on South Darfur state from South
Sudan, pointing out that such “false accusations” aim to cover up
fresh air strikes carried out in South Sudan’s Northern Bhar el-Ghazal
State.

“The accusations directed against JEM aim to cover up the aerial
bombardment carried by the Sudanese army on the South Sudanese
territory in violation of a UN resolution” said Ahmed Hussein Adam,
JEM secretary for foreign affairs.

Ahmed further stressed that Sudan’s defense minister and head of its
negotiating team Abdel-Rahim Hussein “should be held accountable of
this aggression.”

After the bombing allegations, the African Union — which is overseeing
the Sudan-South Sudan negotiations — said it would investigate the
incident, which is widely seen as a setback to the efforts by both
country’s to resolve their outstanding issues before the 2 August
deadline.

Meanwhile, the U.N. team reportedly said the six bombs created small
craters where they came down in Northern Bahr el Ghazal state early
Friday.

“The craters are almost in one line, possibly indicating a bombing run
by an aircraft. Bomb fragments and debris was visible in and around
the craters. The smell of ‘gunpowder’ was also evident,” AP quotes the
UN report.

Phillip Aguer, the South Sudan army (SPLA) spokesman told Sudan
Tribune on Wednesday that the Sudanese military dropped eight bombs
from Antonov planes, a revelation the sharply contradicts the UN
observers’ assessment report.

A report from the SPLA commander in the area, according to Aguer,
indicates that two people, a man and woman who were injured by the
bombings.

He however described Khartoum’s action as a “hostile and provocative”
aggression, which happened when the SPLA least expected, given the
ongoing negotiations on outstanding issues in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
between the two countries.

“We are not surprised by this action from SAF. This is the
characteristic behavior of Khartoum and we are glad that an
independent team has come in to verify our position,” the SPLA
spokesman said in reference to the internal UN observer’s report.

Aguer said the ill-intentions of some elements, allegedly from within
the Sudan army general headquarters to “derail” the peace process,
will not help Khartoum and its people in attaining sustainable peace
and stability.

(ST).

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to