Enough 101: What is the Abyei Area and Why is it Disputed?



Posted by Mollie Zapata on Jan 15, 2013








Editor’s Note: This post is a brief history, intended to provide a
contextual background for understanding the complex issues that the
Enough Project works on. It is part of the series Enough 101.

The Abyei Area covers 4,000 square miles of desert, farmland, and oil
fields located along the ill-defined border between Sudan and South
Sudan. Abyei is claimed by both countries and has been a source of
conflict in the Sudans for over 50 years.

Abyei’s rich oil reserves make the region economically desirable to
both Sudan and South Sudan. Its border location has also led to
conflicting ethnic, cultural, and linguistic claims. Resolving the
status of the Abyei Area is one of the essential steps Sudan and South
Sudan need to take to ensure long-term peace in the region.



The people of Abyei

Abyei is the traditional homeland of the Ngok Dinka, a tribal group
with strong ethnic, cultural, and linguistic ties to the Dinka of
South Sudan. Misseriya herders, members of a northern nomadic Arab
tribe, seasonally traverse Abyei and other North-South border areas
with their cattle in search of water and pasture in the dry season and
to trade goods.

Abyei’s complicated history

At the end of Sudan’s First Civil War (1955-1972), the Addis Ababa
Agreement promised residents of Abyei the right to hold a referendum
to determine whether they would remain a part of northern Sudan or
join the newly formed southern region. However, in 1983, Sudan’s
Second Civil War erupted, in part because Sudan’s President Jaafar
Nimeiri refused to allow Abyei its referendum.

To end the Second Civil War, northern and southern Sudan signed the
Comprehensive Peace Agreement, or CPA, in 2005.

The CPA included the Abyei Protocol, which planned to replace Abyei
district (as it was called when it was a part of South Kordofan state,
Sudan) with a new jurisdiction with special administrative status.
Abyei would remain under this special administrative status until a
final status referendum was conducted. This referendum would allow
residents to determine whether Abyei would become part of Sudan or
South Sudan. The Abyei Area Referendum was scheduled to occur
simultaneous with the southern Sudan Referendum in January 2011. It
never happened.

The Abyei Protocol also established a commission to define and
demarcate Abyei's border. After agreeing that this border demarcation
would be "final and binding," the government of Sudan rejected the
commission’s proposal.

The ongoing dispute over Abyei’s borders led to armed clashes between
Sudan Armed Forces (the army of the Sudanese government in Khartoum),
and the Sudan People’s Liberation Army (the army of South Sudan). From
2007-2008 these clashes led to the displacement of 25,000 civilians
from Abyei. To end the violence, officials on both sides agreed to
arbitrate their dispute over Abyei’s boundaries. In 2009, the
Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague redefined Abyei’s
boundaries. These boundaries are a continued source of tension, mainly
because they cut the South off from the coveted Heglig oil field.

In the lead-up to South Sudan’s independence, all eyes were on Abyei,
amid fears that disputes over its status would spark a return to war.
Southern Sudanese went to the polls on schedule on January 9, 2011
(where they voted for secession, which led to the birth of South Sudan
in July 2011), but Abyei’s vote was postponed due to a disagreement
over the definition of the term “resident” of the Abyei Area.
Semi-nomadic Misseriya tribes travel through the area seasonally, but
South Sudan disputes their actual residency.

In May 2011, Sudan-backed militia and SAF troops invaded the Abyei
area. Northern forces swept through the disputed area, destroying
civilian property and displacing over 110,000 Ngok Dinka from their
traditional homeland. Most of these civilians remain displaced today.

Following the outbreak of violence, the government of Sudan and the
South’s ruling political party, the Sudan People’s Liberation
Movement, or SPLM, signed a temporary peace agreement in June 2011.
The agreement calls for a U.N.-backed interim security force of
Ethiopian soldiers, the withdrawal of SAF and SPLA troops, and the
establishment of a new joint administration. The agreement also
preserved the right of the Ngok Dinka and other “residents” of Abyei
to vote in a final status referendum, without elaborating further on
who exactly would be eligible to vote. This referendum has yet to
occur.

Abyei today


Tensions remain high in the Abyei Area. Ngok Dinka who were displaced
by the May 2011 violence are returning as Misseriya herders continue
to migrate through each dry season. Meanwhile, leaders of Sudan and
South Sudan continue to negotiate to determine Abyei’s final status. A
September 2012  proposal, presented by the African Union High-Level
Implementation Panel, or AUHIP, provides for a referendum to occur in
October 2013. The proposal also identifies the rights that local
communities will retain, regardless the outcome of the referendum.
South Sudan accepted the proposal, but Sudan rejected it. The African
Union Peace and Security Council, or A.U. PSC, subsequently announced
its intention to adopt the proposal as final and binding, should the
parties not agree.

In early January 2013, Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir and South
Sudanese President Salva Kiir met and delayed further on an agreement
on Abyei’s final status. The longer Abyei’s final status remains
unresolved, the greater the potential for further violence in the area
and between the two Sudans.

Map: Abyei Area (Wikimedia Commons)

This post was corrected to state that the Heglig oil field is
currently part of Sudan.

Related Stories:
 •Field Dispatch: Abyei in Flux
 •Sudan: Abyei Residents Skeptical of New Agreement
 •Photo Slideshow: Abyei Invasion Aftermath

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to