No progress in Bashir Kirr meeting over Sudans issues

January 26, 2013 (KHARTOUM) - Presidents Omer Al-Bashir and Salva Kiir
failed to achieve tangible progress in the stalled talks between
Khartoum and Juba over Abyei, and disputed areas as well as oil
exportation.
President Omer Al-Bashir receives his South Sudanese counterpart Salva
Kiir after his arrival to Khartoum in October 2011 (AFP)
The meeting, which took place before a meeting of the African Union
Peace and Security Council (AUPSC), was initially planned to discuss
the final status of Abyei as in their previous meeting it had been
agreed to activate the buffer zone and form Abyei institutions.

With the failure of the two sides to implement these decisions, the
two leaders repeated the positions of their delegations in a meeting
attended by the chief mediator before to head to the AUPSC summit
which had to discuss and decide over the disputes between the two
countries.

Speaking at the AUPSC meeting the South Sudanese president Salva Kiir
called on the presidential gathering to decide on the conflicts
between the two neighbours, stressing that endless discussions with
Khartoum would not yield any result.

"If there is to be progress, the cycle of negotiation cannot continue
indefinitely. We must shift from rhetoric to action," he told the high
level security meeting which has to decide whether or not it will
refer the disputed issues to the U.N. Security Council.

"We have exhausted the issue of Abyei for seven years. This issue does
not require further negotiation but rather swift adoption and
implementation of the AUHIP proposal," he further stressed.

Since the signing of the 27 September Cooperation Agreement, the two
parties have failed to operationalise the demilitarised zone, because
of the Sudanese rebels issue but also because of the disputed Mile 14
area.

Sudan says the South Sudan proposes to withdraw its troops only from
120 kilometres of the 200 kilometres area of Mile 14 which located
between East Darfur state and Northern Bahr el-Ghazal.

Sudanese foreign minister Ali Karti told SUNA that the South Sudan
does not intend to recognise these 80 kilometres as disputed zone
because they intend to maintain their troops there.

"It was clear for the African mediation that the South Sudanese
position is a new development," he further added.

The minister further said the meeting between the two leaders did not
discuss the final status of Abyei because the parties did not yet
implement the signed agreements, alluding to the formation of Abyei
Legislative Council as the parties continue to diverge over the
percentage of seat allocated to each side.

He went further to accuse "some people from Abyei area" of aiming to
hamper the implementation of other agreements by focusing only on
Abyei issue.

Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma the chairperson of the African Union Commission
told the AUPSC meeting on Friday 25 January that the "situation in
Sudan and South Sudan poses a particular set of challenges to Africa"
on issues related to diversity in a united continent and
neighbourliness and mutual viability.

She further underlined that the implementation of the signed agreement
remains a source of "great concern" and called on the AUPSC to call
for the implementation of the bilateral deals.

"It is my hope that this Council will call on the two states to
urgently and unconditionally implement all aspects of the agreements
which were mutually acceptable compromises on both sides."

On Sunday the African leaders will start their annual ordinary meeting
which seemingly would be dominated by the recent developments in Mali
as well as other issues of Somalia and Sudan – South Sudan .

No details are yet available on whether a resolution on the
outstanding issues will be announced Sunday or not.

(ST)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to