Sudan served as a hub for receiving Al-Qaeda suspects nabbed by CIA: report

ArticleComments (12)
EmailPrintSave

February 5, 2013 (WASHINGTON) – The CIA transferred five individuals
suspected of having links to Al-Qaeda from Malawi to Sudan in 2003,
according to a report released on Tuesday.


A new report reveals Sudan provided assistance to the CIA following
the 9/11 attacks (CIA)
The revealing report titled ‘Globalizing Torture’, issued by the Open
Society Justice Initiative (OSJI), provides a detailed account of
assistance provided by more than 50 countries around the world to the
United States in the wake of the 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks
on New York and Washington.

The help included permitting the CIA to run secret interrogation
prisons on their soil, as well as allowing the agency to use their
airports for refuelling while moving prisoners around the world.

Fahad al Bahli (Saudi Arabia), Arif Ulusam and Ibrahim Habaci
(Turkey), Khalifa Abdi Hassan (Kenya) and Mahmud Sardar Issa (Sudan)
were taken into custody in Malawi in a joint operation involving the
CIA and Malawi’s National Intelligence Bureau.

Two days later they were secretly flown to Zimbabwe where they were
held for almost a month.

The five men were later flown to Sudan where they were released after
it was established that there was no evidence linking them to
Al-Qaeda, the 211-page report said.

It is not clear where and for how long they were held in Sudan and
whether Sudan’s National Intelligence and Security Services (NISS) was
involved in their interrogation.

OSJI referenced a 2006 report by Amnesty International (AI) which
mentioned that flights N313P-N4476S, associated with CIA extraordinary
rendition operations stopped over twice in Dubrovnik airport in
Croatia, including one coming from Sudan.

Dubrovnik airport manager Tonci Peovic confirmed to AI in April 2006
that “the airport’s log book contains entries on a plane with
registration number N4476S from Khartoum in Sudan landing in Dubrovnik
on 23 April 2005 and leaving for the United States on 25 April 2005”.

In 2010, a German newspaper claimed that the US had secret prisons in
more than 66 nations - including Sudan - used to house terror
suspects. This was vehemently denied by Khartoum at the time.

The intelligence cooperation between the US and Sudan was publicly
exposed in 2005 when the Los Angeles Times disclosed that the CIA sent
a jet in April 2005 to Khartoum to ferry former NISS chief Salah Gosh
into Washington for meetings.

The same newspaper revealed in 2007 that Sudan has secretly worked
with the CIA to spy on the insurgency in Iraq despite the strained
relations with Washington over the Darfur crisis.

In the same year, Gosh was quoted as saying in an interview that
cooperation with the CIA “helped avert devastating measures [by the US
administration] against Sudan”.

However, a US official familiar with intelligence cooperation with
Sudan suggested that reports on the matter have been exaggerated.

“It is true that there was a period of time, as in 2002, 2003 and
2004, when intelligence cooperation with NISS went up but that has to
be put in context ... It is relative as it [counterterrorism ties]
went from nothing to something,” the official told Sudan Tribune last
month.

He said that the US intelligence cooperation with Sudan is nowhere
near the one that exists with Jordan, for example.

Ironically Sudan has been on the US blacklist of states sponsoring
terrorism since 1993 over allegations it harboured Islamist militants.

Sudan has also been subject to comprehensive economic sanctions since
1997 over terrorism charges as well as human right abuses. Further
sanctions, particularly on weapons, were imposed in 2003 following the
outbreak of violence in the western Darfur region.

(ST)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to