Sudan’s opposition dismiss VP Taha’s call for dialogue as political maneuver


March 27, 2013 (KHARTOUM) – A day after Sudan’s 1st Vice President Ali
Osman Taha made a call on rebels and opposition alike to renounce
violence and agree to dialogue, doubts were cast over the motives
behind it and whether it was genuine or not.
Mubarak al-Fadil (ASHRAF SHAZLY/AFP/Getty Images)
 Mubarak al-Fadil, leader of the dissolved Umma Reform and Renewal
Party (URRP), considered the press conference which was held by Taha
on Tuesday as a move to “market” himself as a successor for president
Omer Hassan Al-Bashir who made public his intention not to seek a new
term in 2015.

Taha said that "President Al-Bashir who I knew is sincere in his
words", asserting that the final decision on Al-Bashir’s political
future will be determined by the institutions of the ruling National
Congress Party (NCP) and the Sudanese people.

Al-Fadil said in a statement sent to Sudan Tribune on Wednesday that
the country is "torn apart" and the Sudanese blood is "heavily
flowing" and stressed there is no time for "maneuvering and
deception".

The opposition figure called on Bashir to stop the bloodshed and hand
over power to a transitional government backed by the Sudan Armed
Forces (SAF). The interim government, according to al-Fadil, should be
responsible for holding a constitutional conference which will bring
an end to the civil war and offer a framework for solving Sudan’s
governance crisis.

He said that Taha presented himself as a savior of the country when he
called the opposition forces to participate in the dialogue over a new
constitution as if he wasn’t responsible for the humanitarian,
political and economic crisis which has befallen in the country under
this regime which he said is to blame for the secession of South Sudan
as well as war crimes and genocide in Darfur.

Al-Fadil accused the government of impoverishing and humiliating
Sudanese people as well as weakening the army, adding that Taha’s call
for national dialogue lacks credibility because it comes at a time
when the opposition leaders and political activists are stuck in
prisons and detention centers only because they participated in a
national dialogue conference on the future of governance and how to
achieve peace in Sudan.

He was referring to the ’New Dawn’ charter of which he was a signatory
earlier this year in Uganda that infuriated the NCP over clauses
related to preventing exploitation of religion in political activities
and restructuring state institutions.

Several figures which took part in the signing were swiftly arrested
upon their return to Khartoum and remain in detention.

Taha had suggested that as relations with the South improve there is a
less restrictive political atmosphere within Sudan

"We don’t see anything new in that. It is the same line," said Farouk
Abu Issa, who heads the opposition alliance called the National
Consensus Forces (NCF) of more than 20 parties.

Bashir Adam Rahma, foreign relations secretary of the Popular Congress
party (PCP), said the government "junta" has a history of calling for
dialogue "on their own terms".

Rahman said opposition wants to be part of a "transitional
administration" which would include rebels and the NCP.

Taha also called on leaders of the Sudan people Liberation Movement
North (SPLM-N) Malik Agar and Abdulaziz al-Hilu fighting Khartoum in
Blue Nile and South Kordofan states to take part in drafting the new
constitution.

Sudan has been strongly resisting regional and international pressure
to negotiate with SPLM-N rebels, calling its leaders outlaws and
issuing arrest warrants for them.

But this month Sudanese officials expressed readiness to sit down with
SPLM-N on the basis of the 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA).

(ST)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to