Cancellation of Reconciliation is a Mistake!

Apr. 21More Views, Uncategorizedno comments


BY: William Deng, JUBA, APR/21/2013, SSN;

Few days ago, President of South Sudan, Lt. Gen. Salva Kirr Mayarditt,
sent a message on South Sudan Television (SSTV) in Juba, which read
two decrees from the president: Decree one was for reduction roles the
president said he has delegated to his Vice President, Dr. Riek Machar
Teny. The other degree was the cancellation of a fore waiting national
reconciliation consultation for people of South Sudan.

The news of cancellation and reduction of vice president roles was
shocking for many in South Sudan and around the world. Everyone looked
for someone else to interpret what exactly Pres. Kiir meant by
cancelling reconciliation and reducing the roles of his vice
president.

It was a puzzle, and many questions were asked, such as: are we in
peace? Are these constitutional roles or additional tasks that Pres.
Kirr might have assigned to his vice? What else remains with Dr. Riek?
Are these assigned roles delegated with decrees to Vice Pres. Dr. Riek
Machar? When were the roles delegated? How much politics play in these
decrees announcements?

Why cancel reconciliation? What would these decrees decisions really
mean to the relationship between two big men in the country, and to
what extent would Pres. Kirr decrees decisions demand on the volatile
trust with average individuals who are in dire need of peace and
reconciliation in South Sudan?

In short, let me attempt to share my dismay in regard to this news of
cancelled reconciliation, as well as thoughts about the reduction of
the vice president’s roles, while trying to answer some of these
questions.

To address these unanswerable looming questions among many South
Sudanese in Juba and other parts of the country, including diaspora,
is a simple attempt since no one can exactly envisage what is inside
the man’s hat though everyone needs aid for independent interpretation
precisely on what Pres. Kirr intends in reducing the roles of his vice
president and cancelling reconciliation of peace effort.

Are we in peace in the country?

There are wars in the country from different communities. Seven out
ten states have no peace in their communities. In addition to rebel
operations in Jonglie state, Rumbek, Eastern Equatoria, Waw, Unity
State, to name just a few, have some community problems within or with
their neighboring states.

People are raiding cattle; killing people include women and children,
as well as forcing others to flee their homes. There is mistrust among
members of different communities, while lack of access to local
services have encouraged tensions within these tribal communities.

Are these constitutional roles or additional tasks that Pres. Kirr
might have assigned to his vice?

Though there is a significant power delegated to one man in the
country, still South Sudan Transitional Constitution does not allow
president to take constitutional roles away from his vice president
without a majority vote in the legislature branch. Article 105 and 106
stipulate what president can or can’t do with or without approval.

The executive duties of the vice president are constitutional duties,
and president shouldn’t easily remove them without a vote from
legislature branch.

“I read the read decree and looked at the transitional constitution
and found that the president did not touch any constitutional powers
assigned to the vice president. He [Kiir] had only withdrawn powers he
had in the past delegated to his deputy. So let our people understand
that the vice president is still a vice president with all his
constitutional powers”, Igga told reporters.

Therefore, the power that president reduced with decree from the vice
president is a simple task such as coordinating of national
reconciliation or organizing and coordinating of a specific task with
a time frame. None of these roles required special provisions from the
Transitional Constitution, and THERE WAS NO NEED FOR A DECREE TO
REDUCE THEM!

What else remains with Dr. Riek and when were the roles delegated?

What else left with vice president is certainly a lot but how? Vice
Dr. Riek has taken on his shoulders to see South Sudan thrive as a
successful nation. He wants to see a developed South Sudan where its
people live in peace and love one another regardless of their tribal
or political affiliations.

He sees a south Sudan with modern technology, roads and bridges,
hospitals and schools, agriculture and entrepreneurs, clean water and
rural developments, etc. This is the South Sudan Dr. Riek sees, BUT
THIS IS NOT THE SOUTH SUDAN WE HAVE NOW; however, this can happen, but
there has to be a trust and political will, as well as work relations
between vice president and president to see these ensue.

Pres. Kirr nominated Dr. Riek from the beginning for the very reason
stated above; yet, being a vice though is a role that functions in
partnership. Vice president is an advisory to the president who
listens and believes in the partnership and has strategic vision and
mission for his country, a president who doesn’t just listen to a few
from his inner circles, but a president, who perhaps, has vision for
the entire nation and not immediate family members.

Are these assigned roles delegated with decrees to Vice Pres. Dr. Riek Machar?

Based on information collected, none of the reduced roles were
delegated to the vice president with a decree. Pres. Kirr should have
talked to vice president the same way he delegated some of these tasks
without using the decree, and this is why people are confused.

Dr. Marial tried to clarify the confusion a bit when he addressed the
media, “Riek Machar is still a vice president with all constitutional
powers. General Salva Kiir Mayardit is a still a president with all
his constitutional powers. They are all in office. What the president
had done is that he had withdrawn powers he had previously delegated
to the vice president. It is like you asking me to do some work for
you when you are preoccupied. This is exactly what happened and it
should be understood in this context”, Marial said Tuesday.

The logic question is, why did president use constitutional decree to
reduce unconstitutional delegated powers? Why president fears to just
call on his vice and discuss the removable roles and the
reconciliation since this seemed to be the number one reason for his
political action, and then diminished misperception in the country and
around the world?

As James K. Ruea stated, there were huge confusion about this action,
and Pres. Kirr should stop causing misunderstandings. “There is
confusion. People were confused when they heard it. Some people called
yesterday to ask whether I have heard [about the] removal of the vice
president. These were literate people. They are educated. They read
and write but because they were misinformed they thought all powers of
the vice president were removed,” Ruea said.

How much politics play in these degree announcements?

This decree thing is Stone Age political propaganda that is only used
by countries and leaders that fear modern democratic principles. This
is all politics, but it is unhealthier one because it confused people
and could generate anarchy like it almost did, and it could trigger
unstoppable chaotic situation in an already divided country.

What would these decree decisions really mean to a relationship
between the two big men in the country, and to what extent has Pres.
Kiir’s decree decisions demanded a volatile trust he has with average
individuals who are in a dire need of peace and reconciliation for
South Sudan?

It is true that, “Kiir’s actions may be linked to Machar’s reported
intention to run for the chairmanship of the ruling SPLM at the
upcoming national convention.”
http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article46254, but this is unfair
for a country that had lost significant numbers of human lives just to
reverse what it was against.

Late Points
 South Sudanese communities need reconciliation. If Pres. Kirr does
not trust his Vice Pres. Dr. Riek for political purposes, you, Pres.
Gen. Kirr, lead the reconciliation process because we need it. The
peace can’t come if people don’t talk about the importance of peace
among themselves. Peace is a belief between people and that’s why
effective leaders prioritize trust for peace than war and
intermediations.

No one can win people’s hearts with guns, and if it were so, South
Sudan could have been independent state almost 50 years ago. Please,
President Kirr prioritizes peace and never fear your political enemies
by denying them their political democratic rights which had caused
lives of many South Sudanese.

South Sudan has to be a democratic nation; otherwise, we would not
live in peace despite any effort you or any one in your position would
like to attempt. South Sudanese are exposed to democratic principles,
and it is important for their leaders to understand not to repeat the
mistake SPLM Politic Bureau did in 2010, which was a fundamental
source of the current chaotic situation; otherwise, Somalia would be
better than South Sudan.

But, nothing would be reasonable unless my SPLM party led by you, Mr.
President Kiir, adheres to core principles that our beloved relatives,
include my own father, sacrificed their precious lives for. SPLM that
was supposed to stand for peace, justice, human rights, freedom,
non-discrimination, regardless of gender, tribe, religious, etc.,
development, democratic principles and more is different now than
ever.

The party becomes a property of shortsighted leaders who care less
about young people like myself except their own children. The party is
owned by those that don’t want to diversify or include others that
they deem enemies because of challenging their shortsighted vision for
the country and peoples services.

The party of Dr. John Garang and all fallen heroes, included my
father, was a party of new ideas and development, but has become a
greedy party.

This party is a peoples’ party, and it has to stay as a peoples’ party
by listening to what is importance for lives of people of the South
Sudan. People need peace among themselves; we need good leadership, a
transparent leadership that minimizes corruption, favoritism, etc.

We need development, such as roads and bridges, good education, access
to clean water, hospitals and employment for all young people and not
only those with connections in the government. Our party should be a
party that welcomes young people’s ideas, as well as respect
democratic principles for all people in South Sudan.

Please, Mr. Pres. Kirr hears our call!!!

William Deng is a South Sudanese Community Activist.
 Author lives and works in Job South Sudan. E-mail me: [email protected]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to