World leaders react over Sudan, S. Sudan oil conflict

    Article
    Comments (26)

email Email
print Print
pdfSave
separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

    facebook
    myspace
    twitter
    buzzyahoo

June 10, 2013 (JUBA) - Several world leaders on Monday reacted to a
decision by the Sudanese president, Omar al Bashir to block the
pipelines that transport oil from landlocked South Sudan’s oil for
exports through its territory.

The Sudanese leader, on Saturday, ordered oil minister Awad al-Jaz to
block the pipeline carrying South Sudan’s crude all the way to Red Sea
coastal city of Port Sudan, accusing Juba of its alleged support to
the Sudan Revolutionary Front (SRF) rebels fighting his regime on
multiple fronts.

The impromptu decision, Bashir said, was taken after thorough study to
examine its advantages and drawbacks.

However, the U.S. State Department on Monday deplored Sudan’s decision
to shut down the pipeline and urged Khartoum to reconsider the move.

"We deplore this action and urge Sudan to reverse this decision,"
State Department’s Jen Psaki said at a briefing in Washington DC.

If carried out at short notice, such an act, she stressed, would
violate an international agreement, which stipulated that any shutdown
can occur only after a 60-day notice for economic or technical
reasons.

South Sudan, however, said it had not received any official notice
from its northern neighbour on its plans to shut down the oil
pipeline, less than three months after it became operational.

Ban Ki-moon, the United Nations Secretary-General also calls on both
parties to respect their good neighbourliness agreement of 27
September 2012.

Meanwhile, Catherine Ashton, the High Representative of the Union for
Foreign Affairs and Security Policy also expressed concerns over
announcements that Sudan intends to shut down oil exports from South
Sudan and freeze all nine agreements it signed with South Sudan.

"An oil shutdown would have serious consequences for the viability of
the two states, relations between them and the wider region," said
Ashton, who also doubles as the vice president of the EU commission.

She however urged both sides to prioritise the interests of their
citizens and promote mutually beneficial relations between their two
states.

"The Addis [Ababa] Agreements should be implemented unconditionally
and without threatening to abrogate all the agreements if problems
arise in one area," Ashton stressed in a statement extended to Sudan
Tribune.

The EU commission vice president, among others, called on both Sudan
and South Sudan to take "immediate" action to prevent any support to
armed rebel movements in the other country and fully demilitarise the
Safe Demilitarised Border Zones in accordance with the commitments
they have already given.

Any complaints or grievances about security concerns should be
addressed through agreed bilateral security mechanisms, she said,
adding that both parties should cooperate with the African Union High
Level Implementation Panel to find a way forward.

Ashton further lauded the international community for playing its part
by expanding UN peace keeping forces in Abyei (UNISFA) to provide
additional force protection for border monitoring, including verifying
any allegations of cross border support to rebels.

"Taking appropriate action would have disastrous consequences for the
people of both countries. This outcome must be avoided at all costs"
she urged.

China, which is yet to react on the matter is reportedly engaged in
diplomatic efforts with both capitals to settle the crisis and ensure
the continuation of oil flow.

(ST).

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14orYdF0KUkR4ua13nJEmNoXP4obTo80EDiTmZ6xbu2iK%3DQ%40mail.gmail.com?hl=en-US.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to