What next for South Sudan after Sudan stops oil flow?
Article
Comments (6)
email Email
print Print
pdfSave
separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation
facebook
myspace
twitter
buzzyahoo
By Ngor Arol Garang
June 13, 2013 - South Sudan has now confirmed media reports about
decision by Sudanese president Bashir, ordering his minister of
petroleum to shut down flow of the crude oil to the international
markets through Sudan. Bashir made the decision at a rally north of
his country’s capital Khartoum. He was inaugurating electricity
project in the city, making the day one of the joyous days for his
supporters.
I watched it on Sudanese television stationed in the twin city of
Omdurman after receiving calls from number of foreign journalists, one
of whom had a local colleague from Sudan who attended the event. They
were seeking contacts of relevant south Sudanese officials to gather
reactions to balance up their stories. They also sought my reaction
which I declined but helped them get the contacts they wanted.
Reasons given by the Sudanese president for ordering stoppage of the
oil from flowing to the international markets through Sudan was that,
according to him, the government of South Sudan provides support to
the coalition of rebel groups fighting with declared agenda to remove
his government from power. These are not new allegations. They have
been there since secession and the government of President Salva Kiir
Mayardit has always been quick to deny, questioning credibility of the
source of the allegations. Not only has President Kiir’s
administration been engaged in the denial about the claims which are
made by the government of Sudan headquartered in Khartoum but also
accuse Sudan of having been providing strategic supports to his
political opponents and different militia groups, allegedly to fight
proxy war calculated to destabilise the new born country.
These allegations of Sudan providing weapons have been substantiated
by defecting militia groups back to the South with heavy military
weapons, ammunitions, vehicles, uniforms and of course knowledge.
Three groups have come from Sudan after independence. One came in 2012
under the command of Major General John Duit and the other came in
April 2013 under the command of Major General Bapiny Monytuil. The new
group under the command of General Johnson Uliny came this month, just
a week in Upper Nile State. They were all responding to the number of
amnesties issued by President Salva Kiir, one of which was issued in
April 2013, pardoning all the groups for crimes they have committed
while fighting his government in different places in the country.
Besides claims by these groups, the United Nations Mission in South
Sudan (UNMISS) also confirmed reports of spotting white aircraft,
dropping parcels suspected to be weapons and other military supplies
allegedly by the government of Sudan to the militia group led by David
Yauyau in Jonglei State.
Add to these allegations was the designation of South Sudan by the
Sudanese parliament as an enemy state after the Sudanese defense
minister and 1st vice president said Khartoum would embark on plans to
collaborate with other political forces to remove the SPLM led
government in Juba. These, among other pejorative remarks, were made
at the height of conflict over Panthou which is also known as Heglig
in Sudan. The language, however, changed after the two countries
reached an understanding to sign cooperation agreement in September
2012, a deal which many in South Sudan saw as a sold out of some
territories by the government in Juba so as to get oil flow again. It
was struck in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, after months of negotiations
facilitated by the African Union High Level Implementation Panel.
One of the provisions of this agreement was to create a buffer zone
that allows the two countries to pull back their armies, 10 kilometers
from their initial positions. The SPLA which is the national army in
the south responded to the directives by its command in Juba. Sudan
which was supposed to do same failed, renewing criticism from general
public in the south against decision by the government in Juba.
The list of complaints by South Sudan against Sudan is long and I do
not want to windbag those who would read this article with what is
already a public knowledge. What I would like to share now is the
general feeling, asking next plans by the government of the republic
of South Sudan to manage its economy, without oil revenues. There have
been plans to diversify the economy but which have never been
practical. The government in the past eight years relied heavily on
oil, neglecting other income generating sectors notably agriculture,
tourism, developing roads and improving taxation system.
With oil now gone and not sure when it will be used to support
developmental projects, one would like the governing leadership to
reach out to the general public to seek their opinions and quickly
design new strategy to cope with current economic situation so that it
avoids collapse.
The good thing is that the economy is small to manage. It is not a
large scale economy. The country does not have industries which would
require huge hard currencies to sustain them. The current challenges
are limited. They can be addressed if the government ensures that some
of the suggestions below are implemented.
· Focus attentions on diversification of the economy by forgetting oil
money and take aggressive lead in the mobilisation of the public to
return to cultivation. Ensures land must be dug for food.
· Improve collection and proper management of none oil revenues.
Transparency and accountability must be adopted by following all legal
procedures when handling public funds.
· Reduce the size of the government to at least 12 cabinet ministers
and around 150 members of parliament or even less. The two houses,
lower and upper, should be combined.
· Abolish institutions created for political accommodation purposes,
especially institutions with similar functions.
· · Use financial assistance to support aggressive transformation of
the SPLA with the training, including provision of the modern weapons,
establishing strong air force, raise the payment for our soldiers to
at least 1000 SSP net for a private so as to motivate them.
· Ensures the army gets paid on time as well as making sure that their
supplies, especially foods, fuel, medicines are not in short.
Transparency and accountability should be enforced in the army. The
ministry of finance and the auditor chamber should a close eye on how
the funds given to the army are spent. They should not handle funds.
All their projects and requirements should be handled by the nominal
team of people with expertise in what they require.
· Conduct oil exploration and reach out to countries which would agree
with plan to mortgage off oil to finance construction of the new
pipeline and agricultural projects.
· Use the cuts (savings) from the reduced government to support
infrastructure development especially roads to ease movement for
produce and people, health, education, food production with priority
as mentioned before.
If the government pay a listening ear and do this with seriousness and
interest, I think the country can manage the economy and pick up from
where it is at the moment and join the rest of the world.
The author is a Sudan Tribune Journalist and can be reached via
[email protected]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14op%2BfKNj38EOpzvbjmXNw%2BV%2Bywr7Xsim6BjFpJ%2BVUG4tBg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
