Kismayo and the Rise and Fall of a Somali President – By Abdiaziz Abdi

June 25, 2013

Somali President Hasan Sheikh Mohamoud must tackle the country's
political problems more effectively than he has recent issues in
Kismayo.

Something very bizarre is happening in Somalia. While Al-Shabaab is
still active and wreaking havoc on the country, Somalis are again
dividing themselves along clan lines, this time over the southern
region of Jubaland.

The Somali Federal Government and its leader, Hassan Sheikh Mahmoud,
have become mired in a Kismayo impasse, which has already given way to
an armed confrontation that claimed several lives. In this electric
atmosphere, the Federal Government seems inactive at best and a
divisive agent at worst.

President Mahmoud, unable to resolve the situation, has only been able
to muster desperate statements of little substance. In the face of a
deep-seated mistrust among Somali clans, coupled with accusations that
the Federal Government is fuelling the conflict, rhetoric is not a
panacea.

While the conflict is unlikely to topple the Mogadishu-based Federal
Government, it will certainly throw an element of doubt into its
political leverage. If the Kismayo case is poorly managed (and facts
on the ground already point in this direction), the ripple effects of
the crisis could morph into across-the-board disasters that could
aggravate clan-loaded sentiments all over the country. This could in
turn rejuvenate Al-Shabaab’s otherwise dwindling power. It would also
kill in its infancy the long-awaited negotiation process aiming at
narrowing the more than two-decades-old gap between the country’s
Somali-British and Somali-Italian regions.

Few Somalis would have predicted that President Mahmoud — a man whose
pre-Presidential record tantalized the population — would falter in
his first national task. Hence, many Somalis find themselves extremely
disappointed.

To date, Mahmoud had exuded an image of a genuine statesman,
previously unheard of in Somali political history. He demonstrated a
talent for diplomacy in his showdown with the almighty international
community, accustomed to micromanaging Somali politics (more often in
pursuit of unscrupulous interests of their own);  he condemned
corruption and Somalia under his leadership has gained a more positive
international reception, including the sought after recognition from
the United States of America. Add to this Mahmoud’s latest move — the
initiation of a negotiation process with breakaway Somaliland — and a
pretty decent record was emerging.

But then came Jubaland crisis. This, according to Raskamboni faction
in Kismayo, has been engineered by the Somali Federal Government in
revenge against the Jubaland people for forming their own local
administration. To the Somali Federal Government, however, the crisis
started as a result of grievances concerning unfair political
dispensation felt by huge swathes of Jubaland residents.

The issue is, however, more complicated than these two accounts.
Kenya, with 4,000 of its own soldiers deployed in the region, remains
worried about the fate of Kismayo; and given the proximity of Kismayo
to Kenyan territories including nearby tourist sites, is
understandably vying for the establishment of friendly regional
administration. Kenyan politicians of Somali origin — who happen to be
blood relations to the current Kismayo administration — also have a
stake in the bargain; chronic clan rivalry and contestation over power
and meager resources lie in the heart of the impasse.

What is more, the country is experiencing a fierce power struggle.
Mahmoud’s ascension to the top job was earned through a parliamentary
election delivered via a 4.5 formula, theoretically meant to fend off
an executive power grab and usher in a system that enables Somalis to
govern themselves horizontally by writing their own social contracts.
Nevertheless, Mahmoud has become the czar of the land — the man who
dominates the agenda and future course of the country. There is
unease, in some circles, with his authoritarian behavior and his
unquenchable desire to carry out all governmental roles, including
attending international meetings, signing contracts and disseminating
talking points to the press. Nothing is too big or too small for the
President’s span of attention.

Having surrounded himself with yes-men (most of them are men), the
President finds himself all-knowing and all-alone; thus Mahmoud has
become a victim of a textbook example of group-think. Perhaps one
should marvel at his ability to attend to so many varying issues, and
in the end achieve results; or maybe all this cramming is the cause of
the problems?

Mahmoud is now running the country as if is was his own household.
Jubaland may not be the death-knell of his administration, but it has
certainly ended the aura of perfect stewardship associated with him.
Alas, Mahmoud is the victim of his own mistakes. A balanced policy
that is mindful to clan sensitivity would not only have demonstrated
that he is a statesman but also a magnanimous one at that. But he will
now be challenged more often, not only by the Raskamboni group, but by
many other entities across the country.

For those concerned with Somalia’s wellbeing, Mahmoud’s mishandling of
Kismayo is a bad omen. Of course, not all issues in contemporary
Somalia revolve around tribalism, but a good chunk of them do. Whether
real or perceived, clan tendencies almost always shape the
conceptualization and the formation of all political, social and
economic worldviews of the Somali nation. Sometimes issues that start
free of clan predilections, such as disputes over resources, may turn
into a clan-charged subject and are fought over in the name of
tribalism.

Nobody, except perhaps the enemies of Somalia, wants to see the
country mired in civil war again. The hope is to steer the nation away
from clan rhetoric and hawkish attitudes, to diplomacy and compromise.
Is that attainable? I do not know. But given the costs of escalating
the issue, I think it is worth a try. Against this background, I hope
Mahmoud will initiate a genuine and nuanced reconciliation plan.
Otherwise, the Jubaland crisis has the potential to revert the country
back to “the war of all against all” era experienced by the Somali
people in 1990s. I wish I knew whether President Mahmoud felt the same
way.

Abdiaziz Abdi is a freelance writer based in Rochester MN.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14opMJ5x799mtgd4%3DPaDeaMpbjLA2gb2mgdEXnBNuNi4VoQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to