---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Eric Reeves <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:33 PM
Subject: Debt Relief for Sudan from The Netherlands: What Next?
To: Eric Reeves <[email protected]>


*Debt Relief for Sudan from The Netherlands: What Next?*

Eric Reeves
The Enough Project, 5 December 2013

http://enoughproject.org/blogs/debt-relief-sudan-netherlands-what-next



Yesterday the Dutch government decided to offer debt relief to
Sudan<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article49069>,
an extraordinarily misguided action, the more so since Sudan was the only
country favored by such relief.  The decision is bad for many reasons, but
most conspicuously because of the encouragement it gives the present regime
in Khartoum to believe that other nations and institutions will offer
similar relief; indeed, according to some observers this was the thinking
on the part of some in the Dutch parliament.  The amount to be forgiven is
relatively small— €150 million or about $US200 million—given the massive
debt that has accrued largely under the National Islamic Front/National
Congress Party (NIF/NCP) regime: some $45 billion, according to the
IMF<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article46980>.  Debt
was only a fraction of this before the military coup that brought the
NIF/NCP to power in 1989.  And despite gross mismanagement of the economy,
the regime now believes there is hope it will be given a lifeline by which
to survive current civil unrest in the country.

Let’s be clear: There is simply no country in the world *less* deserving of
debt relief than Sudan—not one.  Coincidentally, two days earlier, Transparency
International released the results of its Global Corruption Perceptions
Index for 2013 <http://www.transparency.org/>.  Sudan ranked at 174 out of
177 countries surveyed, with only Afghanistan, North Korea and Somalia
faring worse in the Index.  Moreover, Sudan’s score actually declined this
past year; there is absolutely no sign of improvement.

This is important because many of the reasons for Sudan’s external
indebtedness derive from corruption, which takes various forms: the vast
system of cronyism that provides political support to the regime; the
illegal appropriation and sale of valuable farmland to foreign companies;
the impunity afforded to the security services in extortion and
asset-stripping of humanitarian organizations and “non-Arab” Sudanese; and
the monumental graft that has defined the regime for more than two
decades—all of these have compelled unneeded or misdirected borrowing. .
Indeed, *The Guardian *(UK) reported in December 2010:

Omar al-Bashir, the Sudanese president, has siphoned as much as $9bn out of
his impoverished country, and much of it may be stashed in London banks,
according to secret U.S. diplomatic cables that recount conversations with
the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court. (December
17, 
2010<http://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/dec/17/wikileaks-sudanese-president-cash-london>
)

$US9 billion is roughly 20 percent of Sudan’s total
external  debt.  Moreover, President al-Bashir, as the Dutch government
well knows, is also under indictment by the International Criminal Court
for multiple charges of genocide and crimes against humanity in
Darfur.  And of course the ICC is based in The Hague, creating a
grotesque  incongruity in what emanates from The Netherlands concerning
Sudan.

But economic issues here merge with the political in ways the Dutch
parliament seems not to understand.  A confluence of factors has made it
impossible for the regime to balance its budget. In addition to the
regime’s large-scale graft, it has engaged in wildly profligate military
purchases, waged hugely expensive wars against the marginalized people of
Sudan’s periphery, and failed badly in supporting the agricultural sector,
which should be a mainstay of the economy.  But it was the precipitous loss
of revenues from oil extracted in now independent South Sudan that made the
spending spree of the past fifteen years impossible to continue (crude
exports from Port Sudan began in August 1999).

Or at least continue with anything like a reasonable monetary policy.  A
whole series of problems have compounded themselves by virtue of the
inability of the regime to earn foreign exchange (Forex) with which to
purchase products and services from abroad.  This may sound abstract, but
it becomes very concrete for the people of Sudan when the regime does not
have the hard currency to pay for wheat imports used to make bread; shortages
and long lines for bread were reported last
week<http://www.aljazeera.com/news/africa/2013/11/sudan-bread-line-as-economic-crisis-bites-20131119135159618758.html>.
And this comes on top of the huge inflationary spike caused by the regime’s
September lifting of fuel subsidies—both for transportation and for
cooking.  Such a spike caused a large-scale uprising in a number of major
cities and towns throughout Sudan, including Khartoum, Omdurman, Port
Sudan, Atbara, Nyala, el-Obeid and others.  The response of the regime was
decisive and brutal: Amnesty International has determined that security
forces and snipers were given “shoot to kill”
orders<http://www.amnesty.org/en/news/sudan-security-forces-fatally-shoot-dozens-protesters-demonstrations-grow-2013-09-26>
when
faced with thousands of demonstrators over the huge increase in fuel
prices.  More than 200 people were killed in Khartoum
alone<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article48306>;
many times that were wounded or killed in the country as a whole.

This is the regime to which the Dutch wish to extend debt relief?

And inflation will only increase as the cost of imports becomes
stratospheric, the Sudanese Pound continues it precipitous decline (losing
half its value so far this year alone), Forex is almost completely
depleted, and to balance the budget the regime must print more money, since
it has no further borrowing ability.  This is a formula for explosive
inflation, already running at an official rate of 40 percent annually, but
at a rate of over 50 percent according to all economists who follow these
issues.  One estimate is as high as 70 percent, and this verges on
hyperinflation.

Although not usually discussed, hyperinflation in Sudan would destroy the
vestiges of the economy overnight.  For this super-heated form of inflation
feeds on itself, and the massive scramble for any hard currency or
tangibles would quickly render the Pound worthless—completely
worthless.  Economic transactions of all forms would come to a halt;
hoarding of food and other necessities would paralyze much economic
activity; and most ominously, the army and security services could not be
paid.  This may result in a popular uprising—or a dismaying continuation of
the “creeping military
coup”<http://sudanreeves.org/2011/08/10/a-creeping-military-coup-in-khartoum-dissent-magazine-on-line-august-10-2011/>
that
has been underway since 2011.

A regime that is broadly guilty of genocide in Darfur, the Nuba Mountains,
and Blue Nile should not as a matter of principle be rewarded with debt
relief until it ceases all atrocity crimes, crimes that continue to be
reported daily from the ground.  Several members of the regime have been
indicted by the ICC, and more will certainly be if justice is ever rendered
for the people of these brutalized regions.  But there are also no
compelling reasons for providing a bankrupt, corrupt, and massively
self-enriching regime with any economic assistance.  Humanitarian
assistance, to be sure, but not the economic assistance that works only to
help these cruel and vicious men survive in power.

This decision brings deep shame on The Netherlands, and suggests that much
of the world has decided simply to give a pass to the genocidal
counter-insurgency tactics used so relentlessly by the current regime for
more than two decades.

[*Eric Reeves is a professor at Smith College and author most recently
of *Compromising
With Evil: An archival history of greater Sudan, 2007 – 2012]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14op0immpPXDMWZBTd20biVMYBS%3DHfFnPp263LVHkmQxErQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to