>From Nationalism to Tribonationalism: a question to Daniel Abushery Daniel
and Luk Kuth Dak

By Kuir ë Garang

*January 25, 2014 (SSNA) --* “The world has a moral obligation to see to it
that Benny Salva Kiir is indicted for crimes against humanity,” Luk Dak and
Daniel Abushery wrote in their recent article,*Indict Mr. Salva Kiir
Mayardit,* published on South Sudan News Agency (SSNA) website.I wished
they’d add Riek Machar next to President Kiir.

What worries me the most in regard to the current crisis in South Sudan
isn’t the slaughter of innocent civilians in all corners of South Sudan.
Indeed, my main worry is what this tragedy has done to people of good
intellect and conscience; people who could stop such massacres in the
future.

I’ve seen people I greatly admired lose their cool and reduce themselves to
itsy bitsy of tribal demagogues or even careless firebrands. This means
that another tragedy is most likely to happen in the future given the
mindlessness of our intelligentsia, young intellectuals and the would-be
leadership of South Sudan.

I read that tribally charged article (SSNA- January 24, 2014) written by
the above mentioned individuals and I couldn’t believe what I was reading.
These two individuals are some of the finest writers in South Sudan.
Unfortunately, the current tragedy has reduced them to tribonationalists of
their former nationalist selves.

I’m responding because I respect these two writers enormously. Their role
should be to devise ways in which we can make trust-building possible
instead of being short-sighted and divisive.

One can understand their level of anger and emotive suffocation they are
experiencing given the massacre of innocent Nuer civilians in Juba between
December 15 and December 18. There’s so much for them to be angry for and
to call for president Kiir to be indicted for war crimes. No right-minded
South Sudanese wouldn’t condemn the deaths of innocent Nuer civilians in
Juba. I’ve written extensively about it on different South Sudanese news
sites and on social media front.

Hear it from me again! The massacre of Nuer civilians in Juba is an
undeniable fact!

However, I have to note something here because our future depends on it:
the danger of hypocrisy. There is truly a need to bring ALL perpetrators of
the massacres to account. However, there’s also a need to be truthful in
what we write and say. There’s so much hypocrisy going around. I didn’t
expect this level of hypocrisy from the likes of Luk Dak.

I get it, there are mindless Jiëëng people, who only talk about the
massacres of their Jiëëng people and deny the Juba Massacre of Nuer
civilians. I’ve condemned this tribonationalist attitude several times. And
this is the same unfortunate, myopic attitude Luk and Daniel are
encouraging!

What’s happening in South Sudan isn’t an apocalypse. It’s a national
tragedy that’ll come to pass. Why are we behaving like this is the end of
the world? How about tomorrow? Do tragedies kill our intellective and
logical selves? To encourage Nuer Tribonationalism is to disrespect the
massacred Nuer in Juba!

Why couldn’t Luk and Daniel acknowledge all the massacres committed in
South Sudan? Why this level of hypocrisy from distinguished South Sudanese
writers? Why are they exploiting this unfortunate issue instead of
prescribing methods that can help us live in peace and harmony? Who’s going
to hold South Sudan together if thinkers and intellectuals withdraw into
their tribal shells?

“What we really need at this juncture is for all of the Nuer people to move
back to our homeland. We don't need to be in Equatorian’s land, or the Dink
land for that matter. We have enough land and resources of our own. So
let's go back to Akobo, to Bantiu, to Fangak, and to Nasir, knowing that
this nightmare will somehow come to an end,” Luk and Daniel wrote.

This is certainly simple-minded and dangerously ignorant. Is this the South
Sudan these esteemed South Sudanese want?

How about other suffering South Sudanese?

Are Luk and Daniel blind in regard to the massacres of Jiëëng people in
Akobo, Bentiu and the town of Bor? Are Luk and Daniel insensitive to the
women killed in the church in the town of Bor, the rape and the killing of
the sick and elderly in the hospital in Bor? Are Luk and Daniel blind to
the utter destruction in Bor and the Nuer tribonationalists writings on the
building walls in the town of Bor?

Disregarding the suffering of others is antithetical to any call for peace!
Do these gentlemen know that?

I’ve lost relatives in this tragedy including an aunt who was killed with
the women in the church. The people of my county, the Twi County of Jonglei
have suffered severely from Lou Nuer and Gaweer raids and massacres.
However, as a person with a national duty, I still believe we have to
remain objective and stick to the facts that can help bridge the divide.
1991 Riek’s and Lam’s defection destroyed my home area but no one was held
accountable. We still forgave one another and moved on.

We can speak for our people, I understand; however, we shouldn’t turn a
blind eye on the suffering of others. The two gentlemen didn’t send a
message of condolence to all the dead civilians and acknowledge the
displaced residents of the town of Bor and the Bor County generally. Is
that the call for peace?

I do believe Kiir as the president needs to answer adequately for the
deaths of Nuer in Juba. However, it’s too simplistic and erroneous to say
that Kiir ordered the massacres of Nuer in Juba. Daniel and Luk are smart
enough to know that. It’s no doubt President Kiir hates Riek Machar with
passion, however, to say that President Kiir hates Nuer people and that he
wanted to wipe them out is a mindless sensationalism and hate-mongering
that should have no place in South Sudan.

Kiir is a weak and incompetent leader. We know that. Kiir has,
inadvertently, allowed Nuer to be butchered under his watch. But that gives
no one of us any reason to be blind to the suffering of others and fuel
more hatred and bloodshed.

“Don’t get us wrong, we are not war mongers, instigators for revenge or for
continuation of this horror; we are peace loving people asking those who
are still serving under a tyrant and thuggery regime to quit before it’s
too late,” the two gentlemen wrote.

Seriously! This is where I lose hope in South Sudan. Everything in the
article is about Nuer suffering and how Nuer in the government should quit
and how Nuer should retreat to their homeland…blah blah…! Does that sound
like a call for peace and togetherness? Can Daniel and Luk mention to me
one sentence in the article that honestly negates their tribonationalist
myopia and divisiveness?

Why do we blame President Kiir if this is the best our intellectuals can
do? Given the fact that they’ve intentionally ignored the suffering of
Jiëëng and focus on the massacre of Nuer, wouldn’t they do to Jiëëng
civilians what Kiir’s forces did to Nuer if they were in position of
authority? How are the two gentlemen different from other mindless
warmongers and tribalists?

And to add insult to injury, and to really prove that they are calling for
more blood-bath, the two writers didn’t mention a single condemnation of
Riek Machar and the atrocities committed by ‘white army’ in the article.

So the gentlemen think that killing of women in the church, the killing and
rape of the sick and elderly in the hospital in the town of Bor shouldn’t
be condemned because the victims are not Nuer? Who’s to be held accountable
in the gentlemen’s opinion? Kiir?

Shouldn’t Riek Machar as the leader of rebellion be held accountable? Of
course they are Nuer triboationalists and only the suffering of Nuer makes
sense to them? Were the two gentlemen like this all along or was this
tragedy too strong for them to remain logical and nationalist?

I know Riek Machar didn’t start this tragedy. He was forced into it given
the facts we know. However, he supported a rebellion that caused senseless
deaths, suffering and destruction. This same suffering happened in 1991 and
no one was held accountable. It happened again in 2013/14. And the two
gentlemen are silent on it.

I’m deeply worried about South Sudan. I agree President Kiir MUST GO, but
not through the barrel of the gun, gentlemen!

*Kuir ë Garang** is an author of seven books including “South Sudan
Ideologically” and “Is ‘Black’ Really Beautiful?” For contacts see Twitter:
@kuirthiy or his blog, www.kuirthiy.info <http://www.kuirthiy.info>**.*

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14oqRBj0aPhEBM81M0oTWiz81zWoCoXY0ShTwmGTWR%2BcJ2A%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to