James Wani Igga's speech is an empty political rhetoric to salvage the
image of his rotten government

VP James Wani Igga. Photo: Reuters

By David Tang

*Igga's Speech to the Summit of Heads of State and Government of African
Union (AU) is an Empty Political Rhetoric to Salvage the Image of his
rotten Government: A Critique by concerned South Sudanese*

*February 8, 2014 (SSNA) --* The critic of this speech is trying to bring
to the attention of the readers on the speech delivered by the Vice
President of the Republic of South Sudan on the Ordinary Session of Heads
of State and Government of African Union (AU) held from 30-31st of January
2014. That the speech made by James Wani Igga, the Vice President of the
Republic of South   Sudan, was indeed a *sugar-coated polity*.

First of all with all due respect, I would like to acknowledge that the
Vice President James Wani Igga is one of the revered politicians and
academics in South Sudan.  However, I was taken aback when I read the
speech he delivered during that important summit .That speech  not  only
reduced him to a cheap and short sighted politician,  but badly
downsizes him to a mere political opportunist who  is there in the
 political arena to just meet his egocentric ends.

In the first paragraph of his speech, the Vice President reminded his
audience (AU's Heads of State and Government, and the  international
community representatives) that what has happened on December 15th, 2013 in
Juba , and which led to the current conflict in South Sudan was indeed - a
"coup attempt" against the legitimate and democratically elected
government, as he called it. To me personally, that is very cheap argument
from one of the senior politicians in the land. In the first place, what
has happened was not internationally recognized, including IGAD's member
states, as a "coup attempt". Secondly, I wonder why the Vice President was
not able to read and analyze the knowledge of his audience about what has
taken place in South Sudan on that day of what they called "coup attempt".
Does he think that South Sudan is an island out of this global village? His
 speech  , I believe,   had fallen into the deaf ears of his audience ,
except for their  saviour, the  dictator,  President Yori  Mosuveni of
Uganda who invaded South Sudan and rescued their genocidal government from
the hands of pro-democratic fighters of SPLM/A  in Opposition.

In actual senses of a common man, there was no coup attempt in South
Sudan. President Kiir and Vice President Igga are witnesses of this fact.
 What happened to put it in a precise way, was a calculated move by the
doctorial regime to eliminate its critics who want democratic reforms
continue within the SPLM as a ruling party. That view was also echoed by
the African Governments and international community as well. In the same
paragraph [paragraph one], the Vice President has equated what happened
last year on December 15th 2013, to 1991 Nasir's Declaration during the war
of liberation struggle.  In relation to 1991 Nasir Declaration, Vice
President claimed that Dr.Riek Machar made a coup against the late Dr.
Garang de' Mabior, the founder of the SPLM/A. He went on to forward, yet
another shallow argument that Dr. Riek has also mutinied against President
Omar Hassan Al Bashir of the Sudan when Khartoum government and South
Independence Movement (SSIM) signed Khartoum Peace Accord.

What happened in 1991 [Nasir Declaration] was what led Mr. Igga today to be
called His Excellency, the Vice President of the Republic of South Sudan
today. Dr. Riek Machar during the liberation struggle was amongst the few
SPLM/A politico-military high command members who argued rationally that we
[SPLM/A] missed the objective of our liberation struggle. He then went to
press for the reform within the movement's objective; which was the
liberation* of the whole Sudan. *That view of Dr.Riek was later accepted
and advocated by the late leader Dr.John Garang de Mabior. Dr. Machar was
indeed convinced that the objective of liberation struggle should be to
liberate South Sudan. In the context of liberation of South Sudan rather
than the whole Sudan, he insisted that the people of South Sudan should be
given options through an internationally supervised referendum to choose
between whether to remain within the united Sudan or secede. The argument
of Dr. Riek that the choice should be given to the people of South Sudan,
is what we have today as South Sudan; had it not been that noble idea he
had , Salva Kiir could not have been the President of South Sudan , let
alone James Wani who does not deserve to be  Vice President of the
country.  A leader who denies fact about history is a traitor and does not
fit to lead.

Coming to the claim that Dr. Riek has mutinied against President Al Bahsir
of the Sudan, it was not a mutiny; rather it was when President Al Bashir
violated and subsequently nullified their agreement - the Khartoum Peace
Agreement of 1997. Because in that agreement, the right of
self-determination for the people of South Sudan through internationally
supervised referendum was one of the important articles. When it was
violated, Dr.Machar had to leave for the bush again and fight against the
government which dishonoured what has it agreed to.  So, it was the right
of self- determination of people of South Sudan argued by Dr. Riek and put
in the Khartoum Peace Agreement that served as roadmap to the Comprehensive
Peace Agreement (CPA), and CPA later gave birth to an independent South
Sudan of today.

In one of his incoherent paragraphs, Vice President Igga claimed that there
are many more "patriotic" Nuer who are firmly standing with their
government today even if their innocent relatives were killed by President
Kiir's tribal militiamen. The Vice President is exactly right when he said
that there are many Nuer senior politicians  who are still serving in their
Government. However, I completely disagree with his argument though. Those
Nuer who remain in Kiir's genocidal government are not in fact not
patriotic . I personally believe that politics is about the principles and
those principles are the ones that bind us to govern the country together
as politicians with the same objective. If these principles are dishonoured
by the one party in the agreement in a way that denies right of other party
to existence, there is no need for someone to personally remain loyal to
that system. Those fellows Nuer still serving in Kiir's government are
indeed political opportunists, who strive to satisfy their dirty political
ends by appeasing the dictator Kiir and his Government. Those guys in the
government can also be described as cowards, unpatriotic and traitors who
betrayed the cause of their people because of a *zero-sum game politics*.
Some of them have even lost very close relatives killed in cold blood, but
yet they still serve in that government. I could not imagine a politician
who can still work with the government which is killing his/ her
constituency.

Another naïve argument put forward by the Vice President is when he claimed
that there are democratic institutions in South Sudan. In fact there are
names of institutions in South Sudan, but these institutions are not
democratic. They are rather failed and collapsed institutions led by
incompetent leader. Just to mention but a few reasons why they are no
democratic intuitions in South Sudan, is recent and the ongoing massacre
and targeting killings of innocent Nuer in Juba and elsewhere in the
country in the areas under government control. If the institutions in South
Sudan were democratic as Vice President poorly claimed in front of
international community, why would Nuer still being killed and  stay in the
UN's concentration camps throughout the country until now?  Vice President
Wani could not see a difference between what their government termed as
"coup plotters" and the deliberate killing of innocent Nuer civilians by
their Government .Therefore, Vice President's argument that there are
democratic institutions in South Sudan is a *strait -jacket philosophy* and
fails to meet the minimum standard of a logical argument whatsoever.  What
I know so far is that the public institutions in South Sudan are plagued
with *rent-seeking* behaviour of the corrupt clique of political elites and
their leader.

The final point Vice President spoke about in his address to AU's Heads of
State and Government, is when he said that their Government has established
a committee to investigate all the alleged human right violations, and
atrocities committed against innocent Nuer civilians and other South
Sudanese by Kiir's tribal militiamen. The question to be asked is, who have
committed and are still committing those crimes against innocent people?
 Who is their leader? This is a complete mockery!  How come a killer
himself becomes a judge to arbitrate on whether the crimes have been
committed or not?  It is like a thief who steals thing but at the same time
becomes a police man to investigate whether or not that thing was
stolen. In other words, it was a government which killed and still killing
Nuer. For this reason, any commission of inquiry established by Kiir cannot
be independent because Kiir himself is the killer and cannot be the judge
at the same time. My appeal to international community is that they need to
establish an independent commission of inquiry as soon as possible which is
different from Kiir's so called* 'committee of investigation' as *ugly said
by his Vice President.

To conclude, the speech delivered by the Vice President at the AU's Heads
of State and Government Summit, did not meet a minimum standard of a senior
politician and a professional like him. How come a leader who preaches
peace can at the same time accuses other party of unfounded coup? The
speech delivered by the Vice President therefore culminated in the betrayal
of the cause of people of South Sudan in their quest for peace and
tranquility in the country.

*The lives in the Republic of South Sudan. The views expressed here in this
critique are solely belong to the author and do not reflect any
institutions.*

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14oo%2BHMN6t%3D0AvPy_-cWVzLasXaBVcbRSHNhB6arN0%2BK1Ng%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to