Kiir's Amnesty, Appeasement & Leniency will cause him his life or position
Feb. 16 More Views <http://www.southsudannation.com/category/more-views/>,
Uncategorized <http://www.southsudannation.com/category/uncategorized/> no
comments<http://www.southsudannation.com/kiirs-amnesty-appeasement-leniency-will-cause-him-his-life-or-position/#respond>

BY: MAKER ACOUTH AKOT, KAMPALA, FEB/16/2014, SSN;

Amnesty is an official statement that sets free those who have been put
behind bars for committing crimes against the State. It is usually granted
by president. Amnesty may also mean a period when those who took arms
against government are persuaded to give up arms in exchange for
non-punishment.

An appeasement is an act of making an angry person quiet or calm and giving
him what he wants. Or to avoid escalation of war by giving that country
what it wants.

When SPLA forces evaded Panythou in 2012 international community, United
Nations and African union condemned South Sudan and demanded for immediate
withdrawal of SPLA forces from the area.

And instead compromise with evil that the regime in Khartoum doing;
extension and encroachment of northerners into Southern territories and
their aerial bombardments of civil population.

Although this is not part of my analysis, it expounds how dangerous the
appeasement policy can be.

Leniency is the act of not being strict in imposing law and order and
punishing the wrongdoers or culprits according to the law requirements.

When CPA was signed in 2005, there were number of militias fighting against
SPLM/A. As a matter of necessity, it was a brilliant decision from the
president to declare general amnesty to all Southern militias who were
fighting alongside Khartoum regime.

The call brought people of South Sudan together and mitigated the endless
effort of brothers in the North to polarize our people.

The president registered successes more than his predecessor and optimistic
citizens appreciated president for the job well done.

Although I agree to the amnesty being granted by the president to various
militias and rebel groups who were fighting the government.

Nevertheless, amnesty has proved beyond reasonable doubt that it is not
healthy option for long term unity, peace and coexistence amongst tribes,
and I would like to urge Mr. President to review his amnesty policy,
appeasement and leniency.

I call for revisit simply because such policies are internally and
externally being utilized by enemies of state stability and those whose
interest is not met to the president's disadvantage and downfall.

There are circumstances where such policies work well and there are
situations where if granted it would be a complete disaster. For instance,
let's take the case of blood thirsty Peter Gatdet and analyze it critically.

Peter Gatdet has been switching sides since, such people are addicted to
killing and use to chaotic life. They will never change however much you
become lenient, appeasing and grant them amnesty hundred times never expect
anything in return.

As I have mentioned it early on that amnesty can bring unity, stability and
peace to the people of South Sudan, government should not absolutely rely
on amnesty to foster long term stability but rather devise ways and
mechanisms of granting amnesty and strategically plan for long term and
lasting unity and stability of our country because amnesty serves short
term purposes and it has been used wrongly by those who receive it.

The amnesty, appeasement and leniency have been wrongly utilized by senior
SPLM/A members to discredit and contemplate the president as failure.

Apart from those who took up arms against state with an intention of being
given amnesty after committing heinous crimes, there are many SPLM/A
members who are tirelessly working day and night against government by
simply taking advantage of the situation.

To make sure that what they are up to works successfully, many SPLM/A
members in the army, police, prison, ministries and other departments in
the government intentionally perform below standard in executing their
duties to the expectation of people of South Sudan, and instead make
president scapegoat of their failure.

The widespread corruption in the army, police, prison, wildlife, fire
brigade departments and ministries by the SPLM/A members which amount to
over 4 billion dollars has great repercussion on the government and ruling
party.

Failure to take serious and disciplinary measures against the persons
responsible of such crimes has worsened the situation further.

Non prosecution of single individual has created unimaginable immunity that
gives green light to SPLM/A members to commit crimes with extreme and
unbelievable impunity.

As a matter of dancing to the tone of truth most government officials need
to be lectured about the difference between public property and personal
property. No doubt that all begin with letter p, please let me caution you
there is huge distinction between the two terms.

Sincerely speaking, president should have realized that this malicious game
is playing out against him. I would advise that this cancer is not
malignant you can apply chemotherapy and rid yourself of evils and
bloodsuckers.

Most SPLM/A members are just liabilities to you and people of South Sudan
where all these things are done on their expense. You are still popular
though that popularity diminishes day by day due to your procrastination in
tightening the nuts.

I was surprised to hear the government officials calling for West to
condemn the attempted coup by former vice president and his friends.

It would have been wise to critically analyze the government relationship
West instead of rushing and demanding their condemnation of coup.

It is undisputed that West especially USA, UK and Norway worked tirelessly
to make sure that South Sudan secedes. As the say goes "nothing for
nothing,' West expect to get share of South Sudan vast resources apart from
their cover "democracy," which is used as an invisible hand in directing
affairs of other countries and platform for neocolonialism.

As per now West is not happy with government of South Sudan simply because
most contracts go East.

To make matters worse failure to take action against corrupt officials,
lack of basic services to citizens and failure to establish strong
institutions which are pillars of nation building amounts to ineffective
use of resources for masses' sake.

This has created bitterness of West with the government of south Sudan.

Although, issues of contracts and turning of deaf ears to Western advice
are confidential and cannot be uttered openly, corruption and lack of basic
services to the ordinary citizens which can be summarized into non
performance by government has intensively being utilized against it in
current crisis the country is facing.

To throw a bit of light on West media about their role, you should first of
all know that they are controlled and funded by their respective countries.

And their purpose is to aid the foreign policies of their countries. So it
was unwise to demand and expect medium like BBC to tell the true story or
admit that there was a coup in South Sudan regardless of her government
position on the crisis.

As many people describe them, West media are there to repackage, rebrand
and tailor stories around the globe to suit and completely alter the public
opinion in their respective countries and indeed global opinion at large.

Let me expound the dissatisfaction of some individuals with the government
of South Sudan and the background game.

The rebels' demand of releasing detainees without trial leave alone other
charges like corruption, president to step aside and withdrawal of Uganda
people defend forces.

All these are sophisticated moves masterminded by a player behind the scene
and the ultimate aim is to eliminate somebody the player thinks he is not
the right man.

To elucidate more on the withdrawal of Uganda people defend forces to pave
way for peaceful and political settlement of current unrest in the country
is just the creation of military balance.

Balance will lead to stalemate, power sharing and interim government in
exclusion of president which I predict the rebels are definitely yearning
for it seriously.

So what is the end game? The end game is what the top man and readers will
analyze.

The writer is former Red Army of Tharpam who went to Ethiopia 1989, came to
Sudan and lived in Nasir from 1991 to 1994, went back to Ethiopia in 1995
and came to Sudan in 1997.
Am now in Nkumba university 2nd year, (bachelors of procurement and
logistics management)
Email: [email protected]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14orZXAtey7EsrBxbNOY5Sdp1s79ez3jGu%2BCP%3D5cGqzi8vA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to