Washington denounces attacks on S. Sudan Malakal

   - Article <http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article50026#tabs-1>
   - Comments (0) <http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article50026#tabs-2>

[image: 
email]Email<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?iframe&page=enviar_email_articulo&id_article=50026>
[image: 
print]Print<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?iframe&page=imprimable&id_article=50026>
[image: 
pdf]Save<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=spipdf&spipdf=spipdf_article&id_article=50026&nom_fichier=article_50026>
[image: separation]
[image: increase] <http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article50026#>
[image: decrease] <http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article50026#>
[image: separation]
[image: separation]
------------------------------

February 19, 2014 (WASHINGTON) - The US State Department condemned the
resumption of fighting in the capital of Upper Nile state Malkal, saying it
is a clear violation of a cessation of hostilities agreement signed last
month between the South Sudanese army and SPLM-In-Opposition rebels.
*South Sudanese army soldiers sit on a pick up truck during a patrol in
Malakal on 21 January 2014 (Photo: AFP/Harrison Ngethi)*

"We are deeply concerned by reports of extensive fighting in and around
Malakal, which this continued fighting - let me be very clear - is a
blatant violation of the cessation of hostilities agreement" said, Marie
Harf deputy State Department spokesperson on Wednesday.

"We condemn the failure of both parties to abide by the terms of agreement
and call on both parties to end any military actions aimed at the other,
and to finalize an agreement on the implementation details of the
monitoring and verification mission", she further told reporters at the
daily press briefing.

The government and rebels signed a cessation of hostilities deal brokered
by IGAD mediators on 23 January, but since it has been breached on daily
basis by the warring parties.

Harf urged the two parties to observe the truce and to finalise an
agreement on the implementation details of the monitoring and verification
mission.

The truce signatories also failed to resume the second round of peace
talks. The rebel SPLM-In-Opposition says Juba did not implement the 23
January deal which provides to the release all the political prisoners and
to withdraw foreign troops.

Speaking about the presence of Ugandan troops in South Sudan, Harf
reiterated American call to withdraw these forces from South Sudan.

"We're urging the redeployment or phased withdrawal of foreign forces
invited by either side", she said.

The American diplomat pointed out that Washington recognised the "role that
Ugandan forces have played in helping defend critical infrastructure in
Juba, on one of the main roads", adding that however believe that "it's
time for those forces to begin a phased withdrawal".

The State Department on 8 January had already said "deeply concerned" by
the violations of the cessation of hostilities and urged to withdraw the
Ugandan forces, warning of "the serious consequences which could result
from any regionalization of this conflict".

Ugandan army spokesperson, Paddy Ankunda, wrote several shorts statements
on Twitter expressing the refusal of his country to pull out their troops
from South Sudan.

"What if violence rolls back into Bor, Juba after UPDF withdraw, will the
US be there to help?, He wrote on 10 February. Eight days later wondered
"what is behind" this demand to withdraw Ugandan troops before to add "What
if there is resurgence of violence?".

(ST)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14orbNv5Ji5pYXeb4Kjk5vOCYEXnrEXe97Qu6OyB5ydEXUA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to