Sudan considering proposals on peace talks with SPLM-N

   - Article <http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article50071#tabs-1>
   - Comments (2) <http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article50071#tabs-2>

[image: 
email]Email<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?iframe&page=enviar_email_articulo&id_article=50071>
[image: 
print]Print<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?iframe&page=imprimable&id_article=50071>
[image: 
pdf]Save<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=spipdf&spipdf=spipdf_article&id_article=50071&nom_fichier=article_50071>
[image: separation]
[image: increase] <http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article50071#>
[image: decrease] <http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article50071#>
[image: separation]
[image: separation]
------------------------------

February 24, 2014 (KHARTOUM) - The Sudanese government is studying a draft
framework agreement proposed by the African Union High-Level Implementation
Panel (AUHIP) for talks to end conflict in the Blue Nile and South Kordofan
states, Khartoum announced on Monday ahead of the arrival of the chief
mediator.
*Former South African president and chairman of the African Union
High-Level Implementation Panel, Thabo Mbeki (Photo: Reuters)*

The recent failure of government and rebel delegations to engage in peace
talks pushed the mediation to propose a new framework agreement based on
what had been previously agreed, as well as African Union and UN Security
Council (UNSC) decisions.

During the discussions between 13 to 18 February it appeared that both
sides diverge mainly on how to approach the conflict. The government wants
a solution for the conflict in the two states before proceeding with
constitutional reform, while the rebel Sudan People's Liberation
Movement-North (SPLM-N) is proposing a comprehensive process to reshape the
Sudanese state and re-establish a democratic regime.

Prior to the adjournment of talks on 18 February, the mediation proposed
holding discussions on the problems facing the Two Areas that would pave
the way for a national process. The government and the SPLM-N before have
previously signed a pact on political partnership, disarmament and
integration of rebel combatants.

In a short statement to official news agency *SUNA*, a member of the
government negotiating team, Hussein Hamdi, confirmed that his government
had received the draft framework agreement, adding that "the delegation is
examining the proposal in order to determine its response".

The draft agreement has been circulated in Khartoum since last weekend and
large excerpts of the proposed text were published by the government
controlled local press.

The former South African president and chief mediator, Thabo Mbeki, is due
to meet with Sudanese president Omer Hassan al-Bashir on Tuesday to discuss
the draft agreement and explain planned steps to re-energize the process.

Information minister Yasir Youssef told reporters on Monday that the
government delegation is committed to negotiating on the basis of AU and
Security Council resolutions and the non-implemented parts of the protocol
of the Two Areas contained in the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) of
2005.

AU and UN decisions provided the basis for negotiations on a framework
agreement signed on 28 June 2011, which the government denounced five days
later, saying talks should only be based on the protocol of the Two Areas.
At the end of last year the government indicated it would accept the
resolution 2046 without referring to the 28 June framework deal.

The talks are due to resume on 28 February.

(ST)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14orob57HD%2BscX5jS2Mvie5p6zi3UHoVg8TydPdzD18MBQg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to