How will Tanzania fair under the Sustainable Development Goals? – By
Sarah Hermitage
Posted on June 17, 2015 by AfricanArgumentsEditor       
Jakaya Kikwete, president of Tanzania, answers questions at a press
conference at the United Nations (UN) building in Addis Ababa,
Ethiopia, during the 12th African Union (AU) Summit.

Tanzanian President Jakaya Kikwete

This year UN member states will finalise the Sustainable Development
Goals (SDGs) which will replace the Millennium Development Goals
(MDGs) established in 2000. Section 16.6 of the SDGs seeks to develop
“effective, accountable and transparent institutions at all levels”.

In the past decade President Jakaya Kikwete of Tanzania has been
lauded by donors and fiscal institutions for his commitment to ‘good
governance’. US Secretary of State John Kerry recently stated that
Tanzania is a model in the region for “good governance, democratic
ideals, and individual freedoms”. This may come as a surprise to some
as President Kikwete has just signed into law some of the most
draconian information legislation in East Africa in the form of the
Statistics and Cybercrime Acts (passed through parliament in almost
total secrecy.)

The signing of this legislation comes after Kikwete’s declaration that
he will assent to the Freedom of Information and Media Services Acts,
which critics state will violate the constitutional right to public
information.

The Cybercrime Act criminalises the publication of information deemed
to be misleading, deceptive and false, whilst the Statistics Act makes
it an offence to publish unofficial statistics or data that have not
originated or been cleared by the Tanzanian government’s National
Bureau of Statistics. Both Acts carry heavy penalties and give
unfettered powers to junior police officers. In a country that has an
incompetent and corrupt judiciary and one of the most corrupt and
brutal police forces in East Africa, the legislation is a licence for
abuse and a disaster for the advancement of human rights in Tanzania.

It is particularly worrying given Tanzania’s elections in October of
this year, with the potential to stifle robust debate. Helen
Kijo-Bisimba, Executive Director of Tanzania’s Legal and Human Rights
Centre (LHRC), states that the legislation is a “desperate and
calculated move by a draconian government keen on stamping out dissent
and alternative views fired by an ulterior motive as the country heads
for a general election”.

Researchers Ruth Carlitz and Keith Weghorst write in the Washington
Post that the Statistics Act “reads like yet another attempt to quell
the dissemination of any information that could be used to paint the
incumbent regime in a bad light and to further maintain control over
the public discourse.” These are hardly sentiments commensurate with
the comments of John Kerry.

Yet whilst Kikwete’s government faces strong criticism for its lack of
transparency and failure to deal with the grand corruption plaguing
his country on an unprecedented scale, the Open Governance Partnership
(OGP) chose to holds its annual meeting in Dar es Salaam earlier this
year.

Needless to say, the meeting was dominated by the Cybercrime and
Statistics Acts, providing President Kikwete with a high profile
platform to dismiss his numerous critics. Kikwete told attendees that
“governments do not like to be threatened…they want to be respected.
Those who use threats and unfair conditions to force the government to
do what they want will not succeed…If you say ‘no more aid’, we’ll say
‘keep it’”.

Hazel Gray, a researcher at the London School of Economics, argues
that the fragmented distribution of power that exists within the
ruling party means that the policy responses of the donor community,
in particular the halting of aid disbursements, have been ineffective
and are likely to continue to be so in stopping grand corruption.
Kikwete’s response to his critics at the OGP meeting certainly seems
to endorse this view.

So what hope is there of Tanzania meeting the SDG in respect of open
governance? It has done little to indicate that it has any real
commitment to this goal. Carlitz and Weghorst, again, remind us that
the introduction of the Cybercrime and Statistic Acts is not the first
time Tanzania has used legal means to control the press. In January
2015 the government banned the publication of the East African
newspaper in Tanzania after 20 years of operation after it published a
cartoon lampooning Mr. Kikwete. The government claimed that the paper
violated a 1976 newspaper registration law.

Maria Sarungi – Tsehai, activist and social commentator and director
of Tanzanian based Compass Communications, sees the future as being
uncertain when “even the highly controversial Cybercrime Act signed by
the President remains unpublished and unavailable publicly two weeks
since it was announced to have been signed.”

Whilst donor responses to Kikwete’s demands that his government be
respected will privately fall on deaf ears, publicly many will be
prepared to sacrifice their conscience for the oil, gas and mineral
resources Tanzania is now able to supply. But at what cost?  With its
reliance on foreign aid diminishing and its indifference to public and
world opinion increasing, as the introduction of the Cybercrime and
Statistics Acts show, Tanzania is increasingly able to tread a path of
impunity in respect of civil society and the rule of law.

Sarah Hermitage is a British Lawyer and anti-corruption activist.
If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or
subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your
feed reader.
This entry was posted in African Politics Now. Bookmark the permalink.

-- 
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/southsudankob
View this message at 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/southsudankob/topic-id/message-id
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14or64VXzMZ_oDxd9fD0bv2ehLLxbCOxJe3WY-iCTNp33-g%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to