Better focus on the unity of South Sudan
 Jul. 27 Featured <http://www.southsudannation.com/category/featured/>,
Uncategorized <http://www.southsudannation.com/category/uncategorized/> no
comments
<http://www.southsudannation.com/better-focus-on-the-unity-of-south-sudan/#respond>

BY R. MODI, JUBA, 24/July/2015, SSN;

A lot has been written and some of the articles have made focus on Dinka
versus Nuer or Dinka versus Equatoria. Logically, it is not possible to
paint a whole tribe or group of people using the same paintbrush or in the
same colour.

Whereas there can be a myth aimed at creating what is called ‘bonding
social capital’, usually those myths are created and propelled by
politicians to achieve their goals.

These kinds of politicians do not in fact care for the good or welfare of
their so-called tribes Men & women, contrary to what their followers choose
or are made to believe.

These political foxes are merely pursuing their goals and in order to get
support, they play the ethnic card.

Just see how they keep their immediate families in lucrative government
positions and what bank accounts they have all over the world.

How they are out of reach even for mere handshakes for their tribesmen. By
this you will know the myth of tribe is just a bluff.

But many people fall for these tricks. This has to be challenged and
changed. If we are going to build a nation out of many but one, clearly the
nation South Sudan has proven very expensive to build and elusive,
demanding our language to change.

We have to deal with human beings as they really are. Humanly speaking,
there is no evidence that a group of people, because they come from the
same tribe or ethnicity, all reason alike.

Scientifically, the evidence to such is miserably lacking. The way we
reason is the function of socialisation. It is not attached to our DNA.

In fact what is called a tribe can be deconstructed to a level that it is a
unit created in negotiated identity. Because in one tribe there are so many
differences that in many case the neighbouring adjacent tribe has more
similarity with a group of people than their other tribe members
geographically distant to them.

Anyway to come back to the topic, there are few points in the case of South
Sudan that needs to be focused on. The important one is this, the
government has failed and it does not serve the interest of South Sudanese,
regardless of ethnic identity.

It is hurting everybody, whether they are Nuer, Ma’di, Dinka, Moru, Zande,
etc. Simply it is not the government we fought for. It has no respect for
the rule of law and in that case it hurts others who are not even South
Sudanese.

Is there any doubt that this government hurts East Africans? There was a
case raised at the level of East African court against South Sudan.

That has nothing to do with Nuer, Ma’di, Anyuak, Shilluk, Muru or Murle
etc. It is simple and clear, this is incompetent government and whoever
sticks to it is serving his self-interest.

And those who are mobilised to support this government on the basis of
tribe not good principle of governance are self-deluded.

It takes us to a point where we need to examine the bedrock on which this
government was founded.

There was too many lies about the SPLA/M right from the beginning. Some
people will feel bad about this, but Dr. John Garang did not tell the truth
to everybody.

His message changed according to the environment or audiences.

I want to draw the attention of the reader to the book of Professor Peter
Adwok Nyamba entitled ‘The Politics of Liberation’. So do not judge me, but
read that book and find the point where he pointed out how mobilization was
done.

When Dr. Garang spoke to Dinka Bor Youth, he told them to go and get guns
so that they could defend themselves against the Murle. When he spoke to
the larger Dinka community, he said the Kokora was the reason to rebel.

In fact back in 2014, somebody called Martin Manyang Mading, commented from
Bor and said they went in the bush because of Equatorians. That article
appeared as a comment in South Sudan Nation.

It was one of those incendiary and provocative statements. ‘Our enemy
number one are The Equatorians. That is why we fought, used their
intellectuals for our benefits, turned their ladies into machineries for
procreation, colonised them and used their resources to settle in our
colonies. Those who are dreaming about federal government, you must know
that our colony is the first priority. We will not leave our colony and
Equatorians will never go free. Practically, as of today, our number in
some Equatorian villages or towns is about 3 times more than the number of
the native people’.

Those are his words verbatim. It appeared on June 8, 2014 at 11:45 pm. Is
this acceptable in a nation? Where is the difference between Nazism and
this philosophy?

That is a mind-set that is not only tribalistic but falls in the category
of Nazism. Any respectable people now will feel revolted by ideas like
that.

Can we now put it that this is the way Dinka reason? I think NO; this is a
demented and very unsophiscated person who is posing to speak on behalf of
a people of varied philosophies and interests.

The Dinka have a great deal of contribution in the journey to liberations
and so are the other 63 tribes.

It is not possible for a single tribe to single-handedly fight on behalf of
63 other tribes, in fact should only 1/3 of the 63 tribes reject such
notion, it is doomed before it takes off the ground.

That is why we are a mosaic. Every community has a specialty and you cannot
compare them. But people like Mading, are going to destroy South Sudan.

The same way Salva Kiir is doing when he spoke to their youth and told them
they fought for this power and they have to keep it. Misinformed people
followed that logic and it makes me wonder how poor they are. This cannot
happen.

The world is global and you cannot dominate any tribe because their
representatives the world over will react. And when they do so, you will be
questioned at the level of United Nation.

That is what we are supposed to be, people who work together with the
global society. Less than that you are ferial nation and who will respect a
ferial nation?

So I do not believe Martin Mading represents the Dinka nation. That would
have been impossible to imagine. Where he got that from, the answer is
above.

He was totally misinformed on the reason for the struggle of South
Sudanese. He went to fight, if he ever did, for exactly the opposite reason
why most South Sudanese went to fight.

His narrative is different and with narrative like that, South Sudan cannot
stand as nation. I am very confident on that conclusion.

If anyone should try to build a nation on such bad, racist, tribalist and
obviously undemocratic principle, they are not going to get anywhere, not
in South Sudan but also anywhere in the world.

Do we have to remind people on this? I think it is necessary. The quickest
people but at the same time hardest to change are in Equatoria.

Even the Brits found Equatoria difficult to occupy. So they used the
churches to calm the people. Any war in Sudan or South Sudan not supported
in Equatoria is doomed.

Again, I am not being chauvinistic. I base myself on real evidence. For
Garang to get where he got, he has to come to Equatoria. Haaa, that is the
reality.

Conversely, if people in Equatoria feel bad it is impossible to hold a
government in Juba. And now we feel bad. That government is going down.
That preferential advantage is not what we play on. We want to work
together with our brothers and sisters in all South Sudan.

We are keenly aware the different contribution you are bringing to the
table. That is why we are mosaic and respected one. A few times I used to
see it happen in Kampala or Nairobi.

Whenever you see somebody paying bus fares for people behind them, they are
South Sudanese. That was obvious. In Khartoum we saw the same generosity.

So together we can make a better South Sudan. But for now South Sudan has
to be salvaged from Salva and he has to go.

I could tell you something in the lines that follow. Garang and Salva would
have been nowhere without Equatoria.

Because the link with Museveni which proved crucial especially in the
battle of Aswa, Kaya, Pogee, Owinykibul, Yei and until close to Juba could
never have been possible without the mediating link of Equatorians.

Forget about their meeting in Dar El Salam. People on the ground did the
real connection because previously Dr. Garang had Ethiopia and Mangistu as
his powerhouse.

When Mangistu was taken out in Ethiopia, SPLA was on the run and by 1993,
when William Nyoun Kuach defected from Pageri, nothing remained of SPLA
fighting force.

That was re-echoed in Rumbek during the meeting of the leadership. And
Salva was the one who challenged Dr. Garang on his administration and Uyay
Deng Ajak clearly said there was no more army to fight.

Had it not been for the Equatorian boys and Nuer, Torit was going to be
recaptured or Kapoeta for that matter.

The commander who entered Kapoeta we know him and the same commander
entered Torit. We know these things but we have been silent. No more.

Fellow compatriots, the best direction is to work for a government we
wanted to have in the first place, one for which that first bullet of
independence was fired.

One that respects the rights of our South Sudanese people and promotes
peace. Such a government will make South Sudanese respectable in the
international community.

We have lost too many in the process of finding a government of the people,
by the people and for the people, not of a tribe, by a tribe and for a
tribe.

We have lost too many and too much and have come too far for us to give up
and we shall not give up until we get it.

Should those who now fight, politically or otherwise for such a people’s
government fatigue out, or be bought out, history shall remember them
harshly and the dead shall not forgive them.

South Sudan at the end of it all shall not fall, for many of her children
are nationalists not against tribes but for all tribes, thus out of many,
only ONE!

By R. Modi
Juba, RoSS.

-- 
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/southsudankob
View this message at 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/southsudankob/topic-id/message-id
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14opUT7X%3DpHm9THUgv_r32LprgdF9dem1Q9BPfC0oZm0pUA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to