South Sudan rival forces withdraw troops from “hot spot areas”

   - Article <http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article57850#tabs-1>
   - Comments (2) <http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article57850#tabs-2>

[image: email] Email
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?iframe&page=enviar_email_articulo&id_article=57850>
[image: print] Print
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?iframe&page=imprimable&id_article=57850>
[image: pdf]Save
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=spipdf&spipdf=spipdf_article&id_article=57850&nom_fichier=article_57850>
[image: separation]
[image: increase] <http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article57850#>
[image: decrease] <http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article57850#>
[image: separation]
[image: separation]

   - [image: Inline image 2]
   
<http://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sudantribune.com%2Fspip.php%3Farticle57850&t=South%20Sudan%20rival%20forces%20withdraw%20troops%20from%20%E2%80%9Chot%20spot%20areas%E2%80%9D%20%20-%20Sudan%20Tribune%3A%20Plural%20news%20and%20views%20on%20Sudan>
   - [image: Inline image 1]
   
<http://www.myspace.com/Modules/PostTo/Pages/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sudantribune.com%2Fspip.php%3Farticle57850&t=South%20Sudan%20rival%20forces%20withdraw%20troops%20from%20%E2%80%9Chot%20spot%20areas%E2%80%9D%20%20-%20Sudan%20Tribune%3A%20Plural%20news%20and%20views%20on%20Sudan>
   - [image: Inline image 3]
   
<http://twitter.com/share?text=South%20Sudan%20rival%20forces%20withdraw%20troops%20from%20%E2%80%9Chot%20spot%20areas%E2%80%9D%20%20-%20Sudan%20Tribune%3A%20Plural%20news%20and%20views%20on%20Sudan&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sudantribune.com%2Fspip.php%3Farticle57850>
   - [image: Inline image 4]
   
<http://buzz.yahoo.com/submit?submitUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sudantribune.com%2Fspip.php%3Farticle57850&submitHeadline=South%20Sudan%20rival%20forces%20withdraw%20troops%20from%20%E2%80%9Chot%20spot%20areas%E2%80%9D%20%20-%20Sudan%20Tribune%3A%20Plural%20news%20and%20views%20on%20Sudan&submitSummary=%20January%2029%2C%202016%20%28JUBA%29%20-%20South%20Sudanese%20rival%20forces%20representing%20President%20Salva%20Kiir%27s%20government%20and%20the%20main%20armed%20opposition%20faction%20of%20%28...%29%20>

------------------------------

January 29, 2016 (JUBA) - South Sudanese rival forces representing
President Salva Kiir’s government and the main armed opposition faction of
SPLM-IO, led by former Vice President, Riek Machar, have withdrawn fighters
from areas in which they occasionally clashed.
[image: JPEG - 61.9 kb]*SPLA soldiers in Malakal, capital of the
battleground oil-state of Upper Nile on 15 May 2014 (Photo AFP/Ivan Lieman)*

The move is seen to be a positive assurance of commitments to respecting
terms of the ceasefire they declared in August 2015 after both leaders
signed a peace deal anticipated to end more than 21 months of violent
conflict in the country.

The rival forces, according to a report released by the Centre for Peace
and Development Studies at the University of Juba with contributions from
civil society organizations, have complied with the terms of the ceasefire,
although disengagement, separation and withdrawal of forces from areas in
which the forces used to engage in regular clashes were done past the
schedules in the peace agreement.

The report noticed some of the allied forces, specifically the Ugandan
troops which took side in the conflict and were expected to withdraw within
45 days after the signing of the agreement in August, continued to remain
in Juba past the deadline though some relocated to Eastern Equatoria in
October.

The Ugandan People’s Defence Forces (UPDF) came to the country after the
outbreak of the fighting in December 2013 and was deployed in what the
report calls hot spots in Juba and Bor. Others were deployed in Nasito and
along Juba-Nimule road, the only tarmacked 225km road between towns in
South Sudan.

The report calls for justification for continued presence of some Ugandan
forces in Juba.

“IGAD has to justify and inform the general public about the presence of
the UPDF elements in the South Sudan capital, Juba, because the UPDF are
part of the forces tracking the Lord’s Resistance Army leader in Western
Equatoria state,” the report released on Thursday reads in part.

The IGAD monitors, it added, should visit locations in which elements of
the Ugandan forces have continued to occupy in and around Juba and report
on any movements or presence of armed groups.

The verification of the existence of elements of Ugandan troops, according
to the report, should be done within the next 30 days. Eight civil society
organizations and religious groups contributed to the report.

Neither army nor the armed opposition leadership was able to comment on the
release, specifically the continued presence of elements of the units of
the Ugandan forces in strategic locations in the country.

South Sudan’s armed opposition leader, Riek Machar, visited Kampala on
Monday and held talks with President Yoweri Museveni. It was not however
clear whether the two leaders tackled the continued presence of the UPDF in
South Sudan.

(ST)
Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules.
Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan
Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the
site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express
yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an
article to [email protected]

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article57850#forum>

   - 30 January 05:32, by Ayuiu Makuac Lam

   What is going on really?
   Is it another rebellion or is it what?

   repondre message
   
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=forum&id_article=57850&id_forum=345318>
   - 30 January 05:33, by Ayuiu Makuac Lam

   There is inner planning not commitment of ceasefire.

-- 
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/southsudankob
View this message at 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/southsudankob/topic-id/message-id
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14oot0hx9Gq77dmpApPki0WoFYHgLviR2GgFWYWxiw2sAOA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to