*Secret aid worker: consultants aren't the problem, it's the people who
hire us/ The Guardian 05.07.16*
One of the hardest things for a consultant is when your work is put on a
shelf and not used or integrated at all into an organisation’s strategy

 “Finding out that after the seventh version of the final report, they are
still not interested in your results is the last straw - it’s time to head
to the private sector” Photograph: Everett/REX/Shutterstock
Secret aid worker

After the sixth requested revision to our report, the fifth change in
project manager, and the hostile conference call, I started to get really
frustrated again about being a consultant. My colleagues and I had spent
many months and considerable energy, resources and brain power working on a
study commissioned by a consortium of NGOs to understand issues faced by a
particularly vulnerable group in a poor country, yet our work was not
valued, understood, or utilised by the organisations that had hired us.

Having worked as a consultant for the better part of two decades, this
recent experience confirmed what I see as a worsening trend in
international development. We consultants get a bad rap, but these days,
I’d say the problem with consultants is not us, it’s the people who hire
us, manage us, and use (or don’t use) our work.

Decades of donor fatigue and tightening aid budgets, combined with larger
numbers of highly educated and underemployed young people eager to make a
difference in the lives of the poor, have resulted in an abundance of
inexpensive and inexperienced expats keen to take low-paid jobs overseas.
International NGOs hire these inexperienced expats, whose educations they
understand and feel confident in (and who fit the job descriptions
exclusively advertised in Europe and the US) especially for positions with
technical responsibilities in humanitarian work like “fill-in-the-blank
technical adviser” or “programme coordinator”. I know this because I was
once was a young, expat NGO worker too.

This has resulted in organisations that are staffed by idealistic, freshly
graduated people, who, because they have one or two international jobs
under their belt, feel that they are development experts.

Inevitably, much of the difficult technical work that needs to be done by
such organisations (monitoring and evaluating, conducting research to
understand the populations they are supposed to be helping), gets farmed
out to consultants. And unfortunately more and more often those consultants
are managed by the inexperienced staff assigned by the heads of these NGOs
(who presumably, are too busy defending their overheads to read consultant
reports or negotiate the required deliverables). Opinions of local local
staff are also increasingly undervalued. This is quite different from when
I started in development work long ago.

Which brings us to reasons that heads of development organisations
increasingly like to hire consultants: hiding deficiencies of capacity and
lowering overhead. If you don’t have the budget, or can’t defend the
overhead needed to hire competent technical staff with good experience to
do the work required, but you still need to look like you’re doing
something useful, you can always hire consultants. And then, when you task
them with an impossible amount of work to be done on a shoestring budget
and ridiculously short timeframe which doesn’t produce the results you
think your donors will like, you can always fire them and keep their
intellectual property (which they signed over to you in the contract). Thus
making it appear that you have technical capacity which you don’t have.

And if the consultants kick up a fuss over their contract being terminated
prematurely (which you warned them could happen for pretty much any reason
at all)? Just get one of your go-getter, young expat staff to criticise the
consultant’s work, quoting from an “Intro to
Development/Research/Statistics” class that they took a few years ago.

Another great strategy is to have the consultants work as quickly as
possible, and then take ages to get back to them with your comments, or to
feed back six or seven people’s contradictory comments at once, so they’ll
never be able to satisfy you all. If that doesn’t work, complain that their
writing is not of an acceptable standard.

Sometimes, there is so much turnover in your young staff, who are wrapped
up in their own personal turmoil, hangovers, and love triangles (par for
the course where people of reproductive age are cooped up in exotic
destinations) that you can easily lose track of what the consultants are
doing or were supposed to have done. No problem, you can always hire
someone else to sort it out.

One of the hardest things though, for a consultant, besides feeling
completely expendable and at the whim of people who know less than you but
feel they know more, is when your work is put on a shelf and not used or
integrated at all into an organisation’s strategy. Pulling up to an NGO’s
headquarters by public transport, and watching as a young expat staffer
arrived in a huge Landcruiser (from an office only a few blocks away) was
disheartening enough. Finding out that after the seventh version of the
final report, they are still not interested in your results is the last
straw.

Watching the youngster, who has never even been out to “the field” since
arriving six months ago, drive away, I start to think, has it come full
circle? Do I just go off to the private sector now?

-- 
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/southsudankob
View this message at 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/southsudankob/topic-id/message-id
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14opCQpx8s4GXnJrJ93YRRHdaOYHqfbTDvW2cKtRS7Jef%2BQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to