---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Eric Reeves" <[email protected]>
Date: 5 Aug 2016 22:55
Subject: Diplomatic Incoherence: Thabo Mbeki’s Gift to the People of
Darfur, South Kordofan, and Blue Nile
To: "Eric Reeves" <[email protected]>
Cc:

*Diplomatic Incoherence: Thabo Mbeki’s Gift to the People of Darfur, South
Kordofan, and Blue Nile*

Eric Reeves  |  August 5, 2016 |  http://wp.me/p45rOG-1Vr
<http://wp.me/p45rOG-1Vr>

The political and diplomatic machinations around securing humanitarian
access to desperately needy populations in South Kordofan and Blue Nile, as
well as unfettered humanitarian access to equally desperate populations in
Darfur, continue to grow more complex. Alarmingly, they have become even
more deeply embedded in the disastrous “*Roadmap*” offered by *Thabo
Mbeki *months
ago. Mbeki, as head of the *African Union High-Level Implementation Panel
(AUHIP)*, has enmeshed the issue of humanitarian access in such a way that
opposition forces in the *Two Areas* and *Darfur* are required to agree to
a “National Dialogue” that will simply reincarnate the *National Islamic
Front/National Congress Party *regime, if perhaps with yet another name
(see *Appendix A* for contemptuous comments on this “*National Dialogue*,”
secretly recorded in meetings by senior regime officials and subsequently
leaked).

[*First Vice President Bakri Hassan Saleh* and *President al-Bashir
himself* have
nothing but contempt for any real “National Dialogue,” a phrase now so
expansive that it has lost all meaning. In an especially revealing remark,
al-Bashir declares in a meeting of July 1, 2014 that,

*“The National Dialogue is also intended to provide political cover for the
present Constitution and the Decisive Summer Campaign [against rebel groups
in Sudan]” |  *http://sudanreeves.org/2015/02/18/fluent-idiomatic-
rendering-of-received-english-summary-translation-of-
minutes-from-july-1-2014-meeting-in-khartoum-18-february-2015/]

[all emphases within quoted texts that are in *bold* or *bold underline* have
been added; my commentary on quoted texts is always in *italics*, in blue,
with my initials following—ER]

Mbeki’s failure to recognize the deeper implications of al-Bashir’s
assessment is of a piece with his serial diplomatic failures in Sudan. His
“AUHIP” derives its name from the supposed “Implementation” of Mbeki’s
“Roadmap for Peace in Darfur”—stillborn and abandoned in 2009, effectively
bequeathing Darfuris the travesty of the Doha Document for Peace in Darfur
(Qatar, July 2011). His uncomprehending response to the Abyei crisis of
2011, his misguided efforts to weigh in on the secession of South Sudan,
and his inability to secure a lifting of the humanitarian embargo on South
Kordofan and Blue Nile: these are only the most conspicuous of Mbeki’s
failures—and yet the *African Union* keeps him on in this critical
diplomatic leadership role.

The AU does this despite clear evidence that the Khartoum regime regards
Mbeki as essentially in their pocket (see *Appendix B*, containing notable
comments about Mbeki and other AU officials, again from leaked minutes of
meetings of the most senior military and security officials of the regime).

In March I wrote at length about the consequences of Mbeki’s latest
“Roadmap,” which seemed to enjoy dismayingly uncritical support from the
Europeans and the Obama administration. They have both pressed the rebels
groups in Sudan—particularly the *Sudan People’s Liberation
Movement/Army-North (SPLM/A-N)—*to sign onto a “Roadmap” that makes of
humanitarian access a political issue, to be negotiated with other
political and military issues, including a cease-fire and participation—in
one form or another—with Khartoum’s utterly factitious “National Dialogue.”
The “National Dialogue” as Khartoum and Mbeki conceive it is a stratagem,
recognized as such by rebel leaders, as a mean of regime reincarnation (see
“A Diplomatically Corrupt Thabo Mbeki Offers His Latest ‘Roadmap for
Sudan’: rejection by the *Sudan Revolutionary Forces (SRF)* was inevitable”
* | *March 22, 2016 | *http://wp.me/p45rOG-1Sa/ <http://wp.me/p45rOG-1Sa/>*
).

Intense international pressure on the SPLM/A-North eventually compelled the
Movement, and the Sudan Call consortium of opposition groups, to sign onto
the Mbeki “Roadmap,” a move justified recently by *Yasir Arman, Secretary
General of the SPLM/A-North* in the following terms (*Sudan Tribune, July
25, 2016
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?iframe&page=imprimable&id_article=59729>*
):

For his part, the secretary general of the SPLM-N Yasser Arman said in a
statement extended to *Sudan Tribun*e on Monday [July 25, 2016] his
movement is ready to sign the Roadmap within the framework of the *Sudan
Call *in order to launch a *new* negotiations process that would determine
the confidence-building measures, the terms of the transition and how to
engage in an equal dialogue. *He pointed that the regime is now aware that
the dialogue process became a regional and international issue contrary to
its original plan. **[Here Arman unfortunately overstates the “awareness”
of the region and key international actors—ER]*

*“Our refusal to sign the Roadmap* has put the Sudan Call forces in
confrontation with the mediation and the regional and international
community but *it was an essential move to prevent [them from forcing us to
join] the internal dialogue” he said “Now this phase has ended after we
reached understandings with those forces [the mediation and the regional
and international community]” he added**.* *[Again, Khartoum shows no sign
of sharing this “understanding” of the regional and international
communities—ER]*

*Arman added the regime’s attempt to use the mediation and the regional and
international community against the opposition has made them part of the
dialogue,* saying the regime would soon realize that it has made a mistake
by involving them in the dialogue. The rebel leader pointed that *the
confidence-building demands of the Sudan Call forces would constitute the
agenda for reaching an equal dialogue, describing the regime’s failure to
force them to join the internal dialogue as [a] “major achievement.” **[See
below *Sudan Tribune* article from today [August 5, 2016]—ER]*

These comments seem to be putting a happy face on a dictated decision,
particularly since—whatever the cogency of Arman’s claims—it leaves
humanitarian access enmeshed in political and diplomatic processes that can
be extended indefinitely. Just today, for example, a dispatch from *Sudan
Tribune* makes clear how fully Khartoum has succeeded in using the Mbeki
“Roadmap” as a means of linking humanitarian access to various others
issues, and indeed rebutting Arman’s claims about the significance of a
SPLM/A-N and Sudan Call sign-on:

*“Sudanese government reiterates rejection of dialogue preparatory meeting”*

Sudanese* Presidential* *Assistant Ibrahim Mahmoud Hamid reiterated his
government refusal for a national dialogue preparatory meeting*, adding
that talks on the cessation of hostilities and humanitarian access will
start immediately after the signing of the Roadmap Agreement by the
opposition. In a press conference held on Thursday, Hamid announced that
the government received an invitation from the African Union High Level
Implementation Panel (AUHIP) to resume talks on the Two Areas and Darfur
from nine to eleven August, stressing the government readiness to reach a
peace agreement.

*"There is no room for a preparatory conference.* The dialogue mentioned in
the *Roadmap Agreement is the one the President of the Republic called for
in his speech of 2014,"* he said. "Once the opposition signs the roadmap we
will hasten to sign an agreement on the cessation of hostilities and to end
war permanently, *after [that] we will move to the humanitarian access,"* he
added.

Following a meeting last July [2016] in Paris, the *opposition Sudan Call
groups* said they would sign the Roadmap Agreement after talks with the
AUHIP head on August 8. They further said *they received reassurances from
the Chief Mediator Thabo Mbeki that the meeting mentioned in the Roadmap is
actually the preparatory meeting* and it would be inclusive as they can
compose their delegation from all the factions of the opposition
umbrella. (*Sudan
Tribune*, August 5, 2016)

This reveals diplomatic incoherence at its worst and most destructive, made
readily apparent in the same dispatch:

*“Sudanese Presidential Assistant Ibrahim Mahmoud Hamid* reiterated his
government’s *refusal for a national dialogue preparatory meeting”*

*AND*

The *opposition Sudan Call groups* said they would sign the Roadmap
Agreement after talks with the AUHIP head on eight August. They further
said *they received reassurances from the Chief Mediator Thabo Mbeki that
the meeting mentioned in the Roadmap is actually the preparatory meeting.*
*§Understanding Mbeki’s Roadmap*

This analysis from *Sudan Democracy First Group* and is surely right:

*On 21 March 2016 and in a clear violation and departure of the
well-recognized international standard and ground rules of mediation and
negotiation, the African Union High-Level Implementation Panel (AUHIP),
headed by the former South African President Thabo Mbeki, signed, as a
witness, a Road Map Agreement (RMA) with the Sudan’s ruling National
Congress Party (NCP).* All other opposition forces which were invited, by
the AUHIP Chairman, to attend the strategic consultation meeting that took
place in Addis Ababa between the 18th, and the 21st, of March 2016,
announced their objection to the RMA and hence refuse to affix their
signature to the document.

The opposition forces that attended the opening session of the meetings
included the Justice and Equality Movement (JEM), the Sudan Liberation
Movement – Minni Minawi (SLM-M), Sudan People Liberation Movement-North
(SPLMN), and the National Umma Party (NUP). The Chair of the AUHIP,
presented a RMA that was essentially intended to push the opposition forces
to take part  in the discredited National Dialogue in Khartoum, which was
organized, supervised and managed by the Government of Sudan, without
implementing the necessary prerequisites that would ensure inclusivity,
impartiality, and seriousness of the process.

*The Sudan Democracy First Group (SDFG) would like to point to the
unprecedented deviation of the AUHIP Chair from the rules and regulations
that govern mediation between the parties of the Sudanese crisis.* This was
apparent in the *mismanagement of negotiations during the consultation
meeting and the inconsistent terms of the RMA that tried to link the
security arrangements and the National Dialogue in a way that completely
neglected the context pertaining these issues.* (“A continuation of
Failure: The AUHIP sign a Unilateral Road Map Agreement with the NCP,” March
22, 2016
<http://www.democracyfirstgroup.org/a-continuation-of-failure-the-auhip-sign-a-unilateral-road-map-agreement-with-the-ncp/>
)

Abdelmonim El Jak, Chief Executive of the Sudanese Democracy First Group,
offered a useful explanation of the content of the roadmap agreement
proposed by the AU mediator.

“The *roadmap is based on two main components*. The *first one concerns a
cessation of hostilities, a comprehensive ceasefire, and political
negotiations on the Two Areas* (Blue Nile and South Kordofan) and Darfur,
while the *second component is related to the National Dialogue process*, *in
particular to the stances of the ruling National Congress Party.”*  (Radio
Dabanga, March 22, 2016)

What must be understood is that in light of the clear dispute over the very
existence of a “preparatory meeting,” and the sequencing of
negotiations—“The roadmap is based on two main components. The first one
concerns a cessation of hostilities, a comprehensive ceasefire, and
political negotiations on the Two Areas (Blue Nile and South Kordofan) and
Darfur…”—humanitarian access has no priority or particular prominence. As a
consequence, humanitarian access, and improved access in Darfur, is
extremely unlikely to be achieved in the near term.

What must be understood is that in light of the clear dispute over the very
existence of a “preparatory meeting,” and the sequencing of
negotiations—“The *roadmap is based on two main components*. The *first one
concerns a cessation of hostilities, a comprehensive ceasefire, and
political negotiations on the Two Areas* (Blue Nile and South Kordofan) and
Darfur…”—*humanitarian access has no priority or particular prominence.* As
a consequence, humanitarian access, and improved access in Darfur, is
extremely unlikely to be achieved in the near term. This is so despite the
fact that huge populations in South Kordofan, Blue Nile, and Darfur face
extreme food insecurity as well as the consequences of poor water and
sanitation, and extremely limited primary medical care. And as long as the
humanitarian embargo remains in place in South Kordofan and Blue Nile, and
humanitarian access is so limited in Darfur, morbidity and mortality rates
will continue to increase. Since the intended victims are overwhelmingly
from the non-Arab or African populations of the three areas, this amounts
to “genocide by attrition.”

It is certainly the case that such systematic and widespread denial of
humanitarian access constitutes a continuous “crime against humanity” (see
my sustained argument on this point: “On the Obstruction of Humanitarian
Aid,” *African Studies Review*, Volume 54, Number 3 | December 2011 | pages
165 – 174 | http://wp.me/p45rOG-I6).
*§ Human Consequences of the Mbeki Roadmap to Diplomatic Chaos*

What are the consequences of this obstruction, harassment, and abuse of
humanitarian relief efforts? I have written often on this topic, but would
call attention to a recent overview of conditions in Darfur: “*Despairing
14-year-old Boy Commits Suicide in Darfur Camp: Suffering from which
international eyes remain averted*” | July 28, 2016 |
 http://wp.me/s45rOG-7384 <http://wp.me/s45rOG-7384>/).

The *UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) *offers
weekly glimpses into the grim consequences for Sudanese civilians of a
regime that cares nothing for its people, only retaining its monopoly on
national wealth and power:

• An outbreak of Hepatitis E virus has been declared in Sortony, North
Darfur, with 134 suspected cases of Acute Jaundice Syndrome reported.

• Since early June, 74 cases of suspected measles have been reported among
refugees and the host community in Al Lait, North Darfur. *[Measles is
among the very most infectious diseases afflicting humankind—ER]*

• About 80,000 people have been affected by heavy rains and flooding across
Sudan in 2016.

• An estimated 115 families remain displaced following unrest earlier this
year in Um Tajok, West Darfur.

The global figures offered by *OCHA*
<http://reliefweb.int/report/sudan/sudan-humanitarian-bulletin-issue-31-25-31-july-2016>,
the *UN High Commission for Refugees*, and others are of course the most
deeply disturbing:

• Internally displaced persons in Darfur as of December 2015: up to *2.6
million* (in addition, more than *200,000* people have been newly displaced
in Darfur this year, primarily from the Jebel Marra region;

• UNHCR reports approximately *300,000* Darfuri refugees remain trapped in
eastern Chad by rampant insecurity in Darfur;

• Altogether, *more than 3 million Darfuris*, overwhelmingly from the
African tribal groups of the region, have been displaced from their homes
by violence that Khartoum perpetrates, sustains, or encourages; this
is *roughly
half the pre-war population* of Darfur;

• The number of people with *Acute Malnutrition* (what OCHA calls the
“Global Acute Malnutrition caseload”): *2.1 million human beings*;

*• UNICEF,* in an unreleased report from 2014, leaked to and posted by
Nicholas Kristof of the *New York Times* <http://wp.me/p45rOG-1pL>, notes
the following:

*"Acute malnutrition rates for children in Sudan among the highest in the
world":*

North Darfur:            28 percent acute malnutrition among children

South Darfur:             18 percent acute malnutrition among children

East Darfur:                15 percent acute malnutrition among children

South Darfur:             13 percent acute malnutrition among children

West Darfur:               8 percent acute malnutrition among children

A tremendous amount of this privation and suffering can be directly
attributed to Khartoum’s humanitarian embargo on South Kordofan and Blue
Nile and the highly restrictive access given to relief organizations and UN
agencies in Darfur. Despite rapid agreement by the SPLM/A-N to an *AU, UN,
Arab League humanitarian access proposal *over four and a half years
ago (*February
2012*), Khartoum has remained intransigent, refusing to negotiate in good
faith any lifting of the embargo.
*§ What Khartoum Really Thinks and Wants*

Here again we must remember what the regime itself has repeatedly said
about the “National Dialogue” when speaking with (erroneously) presumed
total confidentiality: that it is a political ploy, simply an expedient
means of giving the appearance of democratic reform. The following
*Appendix* makes this fully clear.
*§ APPENDIX A: Comments by senior regime officials on the “National
Dialogue” (again, comment erroneously presumed to be completely
confidential):*

In the *leaked minutes of August 31, 2014 <http://wp.me/p45rOG-1wk>,*
then *Defense
Minister Abdel Rahim Mohamed Hussein*—indicted by the International
Criminal Court for massive crimes against humanity in Darfur—declared:

*“Our National Dialogue initiative is just a maneuver to provide us with
political cover for a continuation of the war…"*

In a meeting of *July 1, 2014, President Omar al-Bashir
<http://sudanreeves.org/2015/02/18/fluent-idiomatic-rendering-of-received-english-summary-translation-of-minutes-from-july-1-2014-meeting-in-khartoum-18-february-2015/>*—indicted
by the ICC on multiple counts of genocide and crimes against
humanity—weighs in with the claim that,

*“The National Dialogue is also intended to provide political cover for the
present Constitution and the Decisive Summer Campaign [against rebel groups
in Sudan”*

But Khartoum’s view of the much touted *“National Dialogue”* are revealed
most fully in leaked minutes of September 10, 2014: “Newly Leaked Minutes:
Another high-level meeting of Khartoum regime officials” |
http://wp.me/p45rOG-1Ff (English translation as well as a link to original
Arabic text):

*• General Khalafalla, Deputy Director of the** National Intelligence and
Security Services (NISS):*

“At the same time we guarantee that the *National Dialogue* is going on
within the country and the elections are taking place*.* *We shall call
international NGOs to monitor the elections, and there will be no rigging
because we don’t need to do it due to the fact that the voting will be done
through the National Identification Number and the majority of those who
got it are NCP supporters.”*

“This is an opportunity that will not repeat itself. *We will be in a
position to dictate our conditions on South Sudan using Mbeki and Haile
Menkerios*, who can play this role to enable us control our borders.
Additionally, *we keep the peace-talks forums in Addis and Doha
(Qatar) going on separately* when we discuss the details of the agreement
signed in Addis with the African Union High-level Implementation Panel
(AUHIP).”

*General Ismat Abdel Rahmin, Minister of Interior:*

“Let us bless the agreement politically in the media and *keep our real
position tightly held among ourselves*, working to achieve our goal using
the agreement itself.” *[The regime has been as good as its word in
these minutes, refusing to take the extension of the “Addis Agreement”
seriously. Sudan Tribune reports (April 4, 2015):*

*The ruling National Congress Party (NCP) on 29 March refused to attend a
meeting in Addis Ababa to discuss issues pertaining to
the National Dialogue conference and its procedures. Khartoum said the
mediation didn’t coordinate with the government on who [would] participate
in the meeting; also it said it would be held at the wrong time, **arguing
they are busy with the election of 13 April.*

*In a statement released on 1 April, the African Union High Level
Implementation Panel (AUHIP) regretted the NCP refusal saying it had
previously pledged to attend the consultations. The mediation also said the
agenda of the two-day meeting were exclusively dealing with
the dialogue process in line with its mandate, refuting claims that it aims
to postpone the elections.—ER]*

“Since *Mbeki* and Mohamed Ibn Chambas are *cooperating with us*, *let us
use them to help us achieve the following things:*

[a] Lifting the blockade (sanctions).

[b] Get economic support.

[c] Alleviate the pressures on us.

*[d] Dismantle the movements [Sudan Revolutionary Forces]”*

“Those who want to express their views from the political parties or
individuals are allowed to do so through the *National Dialogue* forums,
not though demonstrations.  *The media must be controlled when it is
covering the news of the armed forces **[Sudan Armed Forces and the Rapid
Response Forces—ER]*. On the other side, any delay of the elections will
demoralize our forces, *so elections should take place on time and should
not be connected to the National Dialogue.” *

*“The elections should take place on time, and the  National  Dialogue can
continue for two to three years after the elections. It will make no
difference.”*

*General Mustafa Ebeed, Sudan Armed Forces Chief of General Staff:*

“We prefer the mechanism of *‘National Dialogue’ *from within. The *Sudan
Armed Forces* *are ready for the elections and the coming dry season
military operations.* The concessions made by the rebels and their decision
to sign the agreement came out of fear from the coming *Decisive Summer
Campaign* military operations. In the past they were not interested in
peace negotiations; we understand the motive behind their current position
and won’t be bluffed at all. Our plan is to continue with our strategy. If
they accept disarming and demobilizing their militias, no problem. But we
will not accept partial cease-fire or humanitarian assistance unless they
demobilize their forces according to a full agreement.” *[In other words,
surrender unconditionally and accept the genocidal consequences for the
people of South Kordofan and Blue Nile—ER]*

* “Let us use Mbeki to help us finish the rebellion for good*. We don’t
accept anything called a ‘transitional government’ or ‘constitutional
conference.’ It is up to the politicians to welcome the *Addis Ababa
agreement* in order *to attract the rebel Sudan Revolutionary Forces to
the National Dialogue according to our conditions, but only if any National
Dialogue taking place is presided over by the president.”*

*General Osman, Director of the** Central Security Corporation**:*

“We got the outcome of the opposition meetings with the foreign diplomats
and we passed it to the members of the 7+7 team going to *Addis Ababa* in
advance in order to sign the agreement and foil the opposition plan. The
opposition conspiracy that was aiming to sabotage the internal
*National Dialogue* and pit the *National Congress Party* against
the international community giving them the impression that
the National Congress Party is not serious about the *[National Dialogue] *and
peaceful settlement to the conflict in *Sudan*… So the decision to
release *Ibrahim
al-Sheikh* *was designed to* *coincide* *with Mbeki’s* *visit to Khartoum*
 and *prior to the submission of his report to the AU Peace and Security
Council and the UN Security Council.”*

*Ibrahim Ghandour, Deputy Secretary General of the National Congress Party
(currently Khartoum’s Foreign Minister)**:*

“In fact, the concessions made by the rebels puzzled me, because the sons
of the two areas (*Nuba* and *Blue Nile*) have not changed their positions
for long time. After that we decided, with the security organs, to wait and
monitor the situation until we got full information about the motive behind
their new position.

*“So we decided to sign since it is not a framework agreement and not
binding to us;* *instead we have* *used their signature in propaganda that
serves our party* and to show that the *National Congress Party* is serious
in regards to *National Dialogue. *That way we will be able to mislead the
countries supporting them in order that they don’t influence the European
Union’s positions. That is why we declared that the National Congress
Party welcomes the Addis Ababa agreement of 2014*. We decided to use the
agreement for propaganda in the media, to be followed by the decision to
release Ibrahim al-Sheikh.”*

*“But whatever we do to thank Mbeki will not be sufficient to reward him
fully for the things he did for our sake and our behalf.”*

“I say that you must properly cover the movement of the weapons you are
transporting to *Libya*, so that we avoid embarrassment next time. There is
a general consensus within the *National Consensus Forces* that they should
maintain their position and not sign the *Addis Ababa Agreement*, or unite
with the *Sudan Revolutionary Front* and *Sadig al-Mahdi*. We provide
the *National Consensus
Forces* with full freedoms as requested in their statement so that *we use
them in bargaining with the international community*, which is currently
supporting preparatory meetings in Addis Ababa for the *National Dialogue* *to
take place in Khartoum*.”

*Field Marshal Omar al-Bashir, President:*

“So in Libya we must work secretly; it is all about the requirement of the
situation in this country. We have political detainees and we released *Ibrahim
al-Sheikh*; but the rest are sentenced before courts and their fate is
connected to a political agreement with the rebels after we force them to
demobilize their forces. This will be done by means of the *Decisive Summer
Campaign* military operations on one hand and continuing the *National
Dialogue* on the other hand. *We will go anywhere wearing the hat of *‘
*dialogue*,’ and on this basis the negotiations will continue.”

*“We will going anywhere wearing the hat of [national] “dialogue”—*in
others words, it is a highly expedient ploy.

The concluding words in this set of minutes were uttered by *President
al-Bashir,* speaking of the tasks at hand (again, this *meeting occurred on
10 September 2014*):

“Prevention of any demonstrations in this month of September by means of
the arrest of anybody reported to have an intention to participate in
demonstrations. *Any demonstration to be fired at with live ammunition.”*

*“Any demonstration to be fired at with live ammunition”—*during the
popular uprising in September 2013, Khartoum’s security forces were given,
as Amnesty International has established, “shoot to kill” orders from the
outset. This is what accounted for the hundreds of deaths of unarmed
civilians, including innocent bystanders—in Khartoum, Omdurman, Port Sudan,
Atbara, Wad Medani, and other cities. No census was permitted at the
morgues of these cities, but it is clear from comments by medical personnel
in Khartoum that some 200 people died there alone from bullet wounds. This
hardly sounds like “political transformation.”

There are yet further comments on the *“National Dialogue,”* again
obviously made with the assumption of confidentiality: “The minutes of the
Security and Military Committee meeting held on the premises of the High
Academy of Security, 3 June 2014 (Part 1)” | published 28 May 2015 |
http://sudanreeves.org/2015/05/28/the-minutes-of-the-security-and-military-
committee-meeting-held-on-the-premises-of-the-high-academy-
of-security-3-june-2014-part-1/

*Current Foreign Minister Ibrahim Ghandour**:*

“Each party was given the chance to meet with the President alone. The aim
was to guarantee their loyalty, and ensure that they remain divided and far
from one another. *That is one of the methodologies adopted in order to
protect the National Dialogue and to keep it under control.”*

“Political parties that have not had such an opportunity for a very long
time were able to discuss issues in detail. Each party was given the chance
to meet with the President alone. The aim was to guarantee their loyalty,
and ensure that they remain divided and far from one another. *That is one
of the methodologies adopted in order to protect the National Dialogue and
to keep it under control.”*

“Those interested to participate in the *National Dialogue* have to
dismantle their militias first; the same applies to the *Darfurian
movements*; we will not allow them to participate in the *National
Dialogue *through *Doha*. Whatever the case we will not accept taking
the *National
Dialogue *abroad: it comes from within the country, and those interested
must accept this condition. There will be no *National Dialogue* in a
foreign country.”

*§ APPENDIX B: **Khartoum’s view of the African Union, AU officials, and
Thabo Mbeki in particular.*

Khartoum’s view is startlingly revealed in leaked minutes of a September
10, 2014 meeting of senior regime officials (see *“Newly Leaked Minutes:
Another high-level meeting of Khartoum regime officials”* | http://wp.me/
p45rOG-1Ff | English translation as well as a link to original Arabic text).

Indeed, language from the meeting of September 10, 2014 meeting (which
included President al-Bashir) is disturbing evidence of diplomatic
malfeasance on the part of the *African Union’s Thabo Mbeki*, *Haile
Menkerios*, and *Mohamed Ibn Chambas*.  Their imbalanced and tendentious
mediation between the belligerents in Sudan’s ongoing civil wars, as well
as their poisonous relations with South Sudan—particularly over Abyei—are
put in a context not previously available from public sources.

Khartoum has obviously been well pleased by the efforts of the three men,
as suggested by the comments of various senior officials. *Former Defense
Minister Abdel Rahim Mohamed Hussein* is typical in noting:

“By the way, *Haile Menkerios* is cooperating with us fully and likewise
are *Thabo Mbeki* and *Mohammed Ibn Chambas* *who are so keen to serve and
protect our interest, even more than us.” *

Hussein completed his contribution to this theme in the discussion by
declaring:

"When they visited Qatar they were accorded a good reception and treated
generously; *they* *[**Mbeki, Menkerios, Chambas—ER]* *are now under our
control. These are the ones we use to dismantle the rebellion*…  *[W]e will
also use* *them **[again, Mbeki, Menkerios, Chambas—ER]* *to subjugate the
South to our will and implement the agreement the way we want. *All of *these
envoys promised to submit to the African Union and the United
Nations positive reports on Sudan records on human rights and freedoms."*

Other members of the regime had strong words of praise as well:

“Let us bless the agreement politically in the media and keep our real
position tightly held among ourselves, working to achieve our goal using
the agreement itself. *Since Mbeki and Mohamed Ibn Chambas are cooperating
with us*, let us use them to help us achieve the following things…”

“After that I met *Mbeki* and we agreed on the recommendations he should
submit in his report to the *AU Peace and Security Council* and the report
to *UN Security Council*. That should include a request concerning the
lifting of sanctions and support to *Sudan* in addition, he should reflect
a good image of the *Government of Sudan*. For *now* *we have won the
game.”*

"But whatever we do to thank *Mbeki* will *not be sufficient to reward him
fully for the things he did for our sake and on our behalf."*

“At this stage we must welcome the [Addis Ababa] agreement [September 2014]
in order to give *Thabo Mbeki* and *Mohamed Ibn Chambas* the ability to be
seen as productive and having achieved something. Accordingly, *we must
participate in the writing of the report that will be* *submitted
by Mbeki to the African Union and the UN Security Council* in order to
ensure that it reflects the political transformation that is taking place
in Sudan.”

This last excerpt represents either extraordinary presumption, or reflects
confidence that Mbeki would indeed allow members of the genocidal Khartoum
regime to *“participate in the writing of the report that will be submitted
by Mbeki to the African Union and the UN Security Council in order to
ensure that it reflects the political transformation that is taking place
in Sudan*.” Mbeki’s corruption has become total.

Especially disturbing was a statement made by *General Ismat Ahmed Babikir,
Under-Secretary for Presidential Affairs.* It comes in the context of the
political charade that is the September 2014 “Addis Agreement,” and by way
of thanking *Mbeki* and Ibn Chambas for efforts that the regime clearly
feels benefited them enormously:

“And I say you must *give incentive* to *Mbeki, his people*, and Ibn
Chambas from *the money of the Islamic Movement that is deposited abroad.”*

*President al-Bashir* also weighed in:

“Our consent in signing the [Addis] framework agreement with the Mechanism
came after consultation with all the relevant organs and supported with
thorough information. Actually, we were in need this agreement. *Accordingly,
we thank Mbeki, Haile Menkerios, Ibn Chambas, and Qatar for achieving this
agreement.”*

After *eight years *of representing the African Union diplomatically as a
mediator in Sudan’s conflicts (first in Darfur, to no effect), *Thabo*
*Mbeki* is well known to this regime.  And Khartoum is in a position to
know whether he would accept “money of the Islamic Movement that is
deposited abroad,” even though this is hardly a standard method of payment
for what are to be neutral and impartial diplomatic efforts.  This is no
small matter, since the focus of much these minutes is on *Mbeki*, the
*September
2014 agreement in Addis* he helped secure, and how that agreement will
affect Khartoum’s domestic political and electoral plans.
-- 

*Eric Reeves*, Senior Fellow at Harvard University’s François-Xavier
Bagnoud Center for Health and Human Rights



[email protected]

www.sudanreeves.org

Twitter@SudanReeves

About Eric Reeves: http://sudanreeves.org/about-eric-reeves

Philanthropy: goo.gl/Ii4buw

-- 
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/southsudankob
View this message at 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/southsudankob/topic-id/message-id
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14oqEpCMco2G387SL9svmWSJj73D%2BfpVfDwpeLpcMqKJ0pQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to