---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "John Ashworth" <[email protected]>
Date: 7 Aug 2016 18:20
Subject: [sudans-john-ashworth] Future lesson for South Sudan from South
Africa?
To: "Group" <[email protected]>
Cc:

"This is a watershed moment because it means South Africa is no longer
a country dominated by one party of liberation"

South Africa has broken the post-colonial narrative. It’s a thrilling
turning point

The ANC’s electoral losses after 22 years of dominance are a watershed
moment for the Rainbow Nation

Saturday 6 August 2016 19.03 EDT
Justice Malala, The Guardian

South Africa’s controversial president, Jacob Zuma, is well known for
his antipathy towards urban black intellectuals, whom he labels “the
clever blacks”.

In 2014, when he was asked about public concerns that he had used
state funds to build himself a £13m palace in his home village in
rural KwaZulu Natal, he replied that only “very clever and bright
people” cared about the issue. In a speech in November 2012, Zuma
slammed urban blacks “who become too clever”, saying: “They become the
most eloquent in criticising themselves about their own traditions and
everything.”

Last week, the “clever blacks” had their revenge on Zuma, delivering
the heaviest electoral loss to Nelson Mandela’s African National
Congress since democracy dawned in 1994 while setting up a mighty
contest for national elections in 2019.

Although the ANC retained massive support in rural South Africa, its
losses in urban areas were shocking and comprehensive. In Nelson
Mandela Bay, the coastal city renamed in honour of South Africa’s most
famous son, voters rejected the ANC and gave their votes to the
opposition Democratic Alliance. Just 10 years ago, the ANC got 66% of
the vote in the city famous for its struggle against apartheid. It
polled a disappointing 40% last week.

Yesterday, Pretoria (in the process of being renamed Tshwane), the
executive capital of the country, was set to be run by an opposition
coalition after the ANC came in at a paltry 41% of the vote behind the
DA. The parliamentary capital, Cape Town, has been in opposition hands
for more than a decade. The African continent’s economic powerhouse,
Johannesburg, saw the ANC lose its majority as opposition parties
started coalition talks there too.

The national story tells a similarly depressing story for the ANC. In
local elections in 2006, the party got 66.3% votes nationwide. The DA
took 14.8%. Last week, the ANC reached just under 54% and the main
opposition DA stood at 27%.

Wednesday’s election was a major turning point for the ANC and for
South Africa. Last October, ANC general secretary, Gwede Mantashe,
warned a party policy conference that were its support to plunge below
60% this year it would mark a “psychological and political turning
point”.

That moment has now arrived as the party that led the international
liberation struggle against apartheid failed to convince its core
urban constituency to vote for it in significant numbers. In urban
townships such as Soweto, an ANC stronghold, voter turnout was as low
as 46%, while those who did turn up increasingly voted for the
opposition DA and the radical three-year-old Economic Freedom Fighters
formed by expelled former ANC Youth League firebrand Julius Malema.

This is a watershed moment because it means South Africa is no longer
a country dominated by one party of liberation. For long, we were
slowly inching towards being a proper, lively, multi-party system that
holds power to account. We are now hurtling that way. It’s
exhilarating.

Former ANC treasurer-general Mathews Phosa, a businessman and former
Zuma ally, summed up the ANC’s losses thus: “We need to accept the
reality that there are many young people who voted for the DA. Where
do these people come from? They left the ANC and why did they leave
the ANC? The clever blacks have spoken… The masses are punishing us
with the weapon we won for them. The vote.”

It’s been a long time coming. Since Zuma came to power in 2007, the
ANC has been racked by corruption scandals, infighting and splits.
Economic mismanagement has plagued the Zuma administration, with
unemployment rising from 21% to just over 26% since 2008. The economy
has taken a beating, with projections by the Reserve Bank saying that
there will be zero growth this year, while ratings agencies have
threatened a credit rating downgrade.

To mask these failings, the ANC ran a negative and racist campaign
that aimed to paint the opposition DA as the party of apartheid.
Campaigning in Nelson Mandela Bay, Zuma called the DA “snakes, the
children of the National party” and repeatedly referred to its young
black leader as a puppet of whites.

Urban South Africans did not buy this scaremongering. As the memories
of the Mandela years and the liberation struggle have faded, and the
ANC’s internal troubles have spilled out into the open, so too has
unquestioning faith in the country’s liberation party and its veterans
such as Zuma. The legitimacy conferred upon them by the struggle is no
longer a mask for their failings in a country that is now scarred by
stories of rampant political corruption, crime and poverty.

The country now enters a new era of competitive politics in a terrain
where once the ANC’s struggle credentials ensured it unparalleled
success. Malema, the energetic young founder of the EFF, has won 8% of
the national vote and is a kingmaker in Johannesburg and Tshwane.
Malema says he predicts the ANC will not be governing South Africa
when the country takes to the polls in the 2019 national government
elections.

It is a claim that would have once been dismissed as a pipe dream. No
longer. Even in its rural strongholds such as Limpopo, where Malema
comes from, the ANC has slunk in way below its previous support
levels. In Zuma’s rural home municipality, the ANC claimed 44.25%
while the Inkatha Freedom party won with 54%.

What does it mean? The post-colonial African story is replete with
tales of liberation movements that have stayed in power with one
leader and one party despite losing the support of the people.
Zimbabwe, just to the north of us, is a painful example of such a
country; Mugabe and Zanu-PF have been in power for 36 years.

South Africa has broken with that narrative. First, Zuma is the fourth
president of the country since 1994. Mandela broke with the “strong
man” tradition by stepping down after one term. Now, with these
results, a future where South Africa could be run by an opposition
party is beginning to emerge. We could see this in the next national
election in 2019 or in 2024.

It may be disconcerting for those of us who grew up with the ANC as
the very heart of the South African political landscape, but it is not
necessarily a bad thing. It heralds the maturation of our politics and
the steady, welcome move towards a lively, competitive, responsive
multi-party democracy. South Africans are using the ballot box to
speak to their leaders and that can only be a good thing.

Justice Malala is a political commentator and author of We Have Now
Begun Our Descent: How to Stop South Africa Losing its Way

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/aug/06/anc-
elections-south-africa-democracy-zuma

END
______________________
John Ashworth

[email protected]

+254 725 926 297 (Kenya mobile)
+211 919 695 362 (South Sudan mobile)
+44 787 976 8030 (UK mobile)
+88 216 4334 0735 (Thuraya satphone)
Skype: jashworth1

PO Box 52002 - 00200, Nairobi, Kenya

This is a personal e-mail address and the contents do not necessarily
reflect the views of any organisation

--
--
The content of this message does not necessarily reflect John Ashworth's
views. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, John Ashworth is not the author
of the content and the source is always cited.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sudan-john-ashworth" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sudan-john-ashworth-
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.za/
group/sudan-john-ashworth
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sudans-john-ashworth" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sudans-john-ashworth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/southsudankob
View this message at 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/southsudankob/topic-id/message-id
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14oq14D2qcgM-NTeC1Vwo3X8TT5Mfk_zrnatsW%3Da9JcuizQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to