President Kiir’s coup claim not true, a harmful plan: Spokesman
Article
Comments (3)
email Email
print Print
pdfSave
separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation
August 11, 2016 (ADDIS ABABA) – The official spokesperson for Riek
Machar, former South Sudanese First Vice President and leader of the
armed opposition faction of the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement
(SPLM-IO), said the claim uttered by President Salva Kiir that the
fighting which occurred at his presidential palace on 8 July was a
coup attempt staged by Machar, was not true.
JPEG - 23.6 kb
James Gatdet Dak, Riek Machar’s spokesperson ’Reuters photo)
President Kiir in a series of recent interviews told the media that
the incident in Juba at the palace, known as J1, was an attempted coup
by Machar to assassinate him. He also said Machar was carrying a
pistol inside their presidency meeting room and his bodyguards started
the shooting outside the palace which sparked the ongoing fighting.
In an exclusive interview with Sudan Tribune on Wednesday, James
Gatdet Dak, official spokesperson for the opposition leader, dismissed
the allegations as untrue, saying like on 15 December 2013, the 8 July
2016 incident was not a coup attempt by Machar, but rather another
failed attempt by President Kiir to kill Machar.
“It seems President Kiir and his officials do not give up on claiming
imaginary coups, although these claims have been rubbished by the
whole world. They claimed this on 15 December 2013 that there was an
attempted military coup, but could not find evidence. They did not
arrest even a single military officer accused of the alleged coup
plot. What they did that fateful night was to knock at the doors of
politicians they did not like and arrested them and charged them for
the so-called coup when in fact it was President Kiir’s Tiger’s
bodyguards who started the shooting at the barrack and subsequently
murdered thousands of unarmed ethnic Nuer civilians in Juba,” Machar’s
official spokesperson told Sudan Tribune on Thursday in response to
the coup accusation.
“So the coup claim in 2013 was rubbished by the whole world and also
by the regime’s court in Juba because it was false,” he said.
He also said the recent claim of a coup attempt on 8 July 2016, was as
false of that of 15 December 2013, adding rather it was a plan to kill
Machar inside the palace.
Dak said President Kiir instead lured Machar to his own palace to kill
him, saying it did not make any sense that someone responding to an
invitation was accused of attempting a coup.
The opposition leader’s spokesperson further narrated that Kiir was
angered by the death of his five soldiers who were killed on Gudele
road in Juba while attempting to illegally disarm Machar’s bodyguards.
“The facts are already out there. Even the media organizations they
talk to already know what the truth is by simply applying their common
sense. This recent claim of a coup attempt has also been rubbished by
the region and the international community at large, simply because it
is false. You cannot go to a palace with 70 soldiers to stage a coup
and lock yourself in a room with the person you are making a coup
against while the palace is surrounded by hundreds of soldiers and
tanks belonging to the person you allegedly want to oust. It doesn’t
make sense at all. Common sense will tell you the claim is
nonsensical,” Dak added.
Dak also said the claim that Machar went to palace with 400 soldiers
in 21 military trucks was not true, saying the number of soldiers was
only 70. He also said Machar’s forces have only about 4 military
trucks in their base and there was nowhere to get up to 21 military
trucks as the government did not provide additional military vehicles
for the office of the First Vice President.
HOW DID FIGHTING HAPPEN?
Dak reiterated his earlier claim to regional and international media
that it was President Kiir’s forces that started the shooting at the
palace in order to kill his boss, Machar.
“President Kiir’s bodyguards and forces hidden around the palace
started the shooting that day, 8 July. The shooting started when one
of their ambulances came and when it reached at the gate of the palace
it turned on its siren and suddenly Kiir’s bodyguards started the
shooting at the bodyguards of the First Vice President, Dr. Machar,
who were deployed outside the palace. So their ambulance gave them the
signal to start shooting, which indicated it was a planned attack,” he
said.
He said when the president’s bodyguards were defeated with almost all
of them killed or scattered outside the palace’s fence, a huge force
in several hundreds backed by tanks emerged from within the vicinity
of the palace and continued fighting Machar’s bodyguards.
Dak claimed that he “suspected’ the plan was to scar Machar away from
the palace and then get killed outside the palace if he attempted to
run back to his base at Jebel Kujur, which is five kilometers away
from the palace. He said President Kiir would have then claimed and
told the world that Machar was killed in crossfire and did not know
who did it.
“Imagine the President made a public statement to the media on the day
of the fighting that he did not know what had happened outside the
fence of his palace. And now after days of fighting he again
contradictorily claimed that it was a coup attempt by Dr. Riek Machar.
>From whom did he get this contradicting information? If it was a coup
attempt why did he not arrest Dr. Riek Machar who was standing with
him inside the palace when he was making the first statement instead
of letting him go free as he has now claimed? There are a lot of
questions to be asked in this claim.”
DID KIIR SAVE MACHAR?
Dak said it was true that the two leaders saved each other by sticking
together otherwise the two of them would have been killed if they
separated themselves during the fighting.
He dismissed President Kiir’s exclusive claim that he saved Machar,
saying media outlets who interviewed him did not ask him where
Machar’s close bodyguards were at the time.
“What happened was that the close bodyguards of the two leaders were
inside the palace with them. However, they made a wise decision
because they did not echo the fighting which was taking place between
the outer ring bodyguards outside the fence of the palace. If the
close bodyguards had fought inside the palace, the two leaders would
have been killed. Any move by either leader’s bodyguard to shoot at
the other leader would have been disastrous for the two leaders,” he
said.
He said Kiir understood that by being closer to Machar, his deputy’s
bodyguards would not shoot him and vice versa.
“They got stuck with each other inside the palace. And that saved
their lives. It deterred their rival bodyguards from targeting either
of them for fear of shooting the two of them,” he said.
He said the situation continued until 11pm at night when a third party
was involved in the arrangements to take the leaders to their
respective residents with combination of forces.
Dak also dismissed the claims that Machar was carrying a pistol in his
hand to assassinate Kiir inside the palace, asking “then what
prevented Dr. Machar from shooting Kiir in that room if that was the
plan?”
The opposition leader’s spokesperson said Machar never carried a
pistol, but it was instead President Kiir’s habit to carry a pistol
with him to cabinet meetings, and “sometimes wearing military attires”
even before the 2013 crisis.
IS PRESIDENT KIIR IN CONTROL?
Dak said there are two suggestions to explain the ongoing violence;
either President Kiir has lost control of his army or he is part of
the plan to eliminate Machar and destroy the August 2015 peace
agreement.
“I would say he is either not in control of his government and army or
he is responsible for the ongoing mess and the plan to eliminate his
first deputy. If he did not know among his army generals who
instigated the fighting at J1 palace; if he did not know who ordered
his forces, with tanks and helicopter gunships to attack Dr. Machar’s
military base and residence at Jebel; and if he does not know who has
been ordering his forces now to go on offensive to hunt for Dr. Riek
Machar in the bushes around Juba, then he is not in control. But if he
knows and does not act against the perpetrator or bless these violent
actions, then it means he is directly involved,” Dak added.
He however challenged that there is no national army which President
Kiir commands, but rather a “bunch of various militia groups” randomly
recruited based on regions and states loyal to certain politicians and
army generals.
GAI POSITION ILLEGAL
He also said the recent nomination of Taban Deng Gai and his
appointment to replace Machar was illegal and a clear violation of
Article 6.5 of the Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in
South Sudan (ARCISS).
Dak also said President Kiir and the Jieng [Dinka] Council of Elders
(JCE) cooked the conspiracy with Gai to replace Machar so as to do
away with the implementation of the peace agreement to avoid various
sectors reforms in the country.
He also said the opposition faction led by Machar was for a long time
“suspicious” about Gai’s deals with President Kiir and JCE, but played
it down with the hope that Gai was going to abandon the conspiracy.
“It was not surprising to many of us when Honourable Taban Deng Gai
decided to defect to Salva Kiir. This move was suspected since
December last year when he led the advance team to Juba. It was
reported in the media that the Jieng Council of Elders wanted
President Kiir to appoint him as First Vice President instead of Dr.
Riek Machar. To them Taban Deng can be easily manipulated and be used
to destroy the agreement if ensured a top executive position. They
used the same excuse of temporary absence after fighting in Juba in
the same way they did it when Dr. Machar was in his headquarters of
Pagak and that he was not returning to Juba soon,” he said.
Gai, he added, was not his first time to leave Machar and strike his
own deal after he was entrusted to negotiate on behalf of Machar’s
faction.
“This is not his first time to run ahead alone by instead negotiating
his own private deal whenever he was entrusted by Dr. Riek Machar to
negotiate on behalf of the rest of us. I can recall that in the year
2001, which is 15 years ago, Honourable Taban Deng Gai was assigned by
Dr. Riek Machar in Nairobi to lead our delegation for negotiation on
reunification with our late leader, Dr. John Garang. But instead of
completing the negotiation on behalf of the rest of us in the then
South Sudan Democratic Front (SSDF), he ended up defecting to late Dr.
John Garang’s Torit Faction in Nairobi. I witnessed this myself
because I was the Information Officer in the office of the Chairman,
Dr. Riek Machar, in Nairobi in that year. This is what Honourable
Taban has repeated now by abandoning being our chief negotiator and
defected to President Kiir before the peace agreement could be
implemented,” Dak added.
He however said those who have left Machar this time will be the ones
to regret their decision soon, adding that unravelling the peace deal
will likely backfire on those orchestrating it.
He said the best course of action was for President Kiir to undo his
illegal actions by stopping the ongoing offensive by his forces around
Juba in order for Machar to return to the capital after the proposed
deployment of a third party force, warning that the opposition forces
may, as an option, take control of Juba to restore law and order.
He earlier criticized President Kiir for “hurriedly” approving an
“illegal nomination” of Gai by a handful of officials who were only
five in number and could not compose a quorum in either the political
bureau or the national liberation council of the opposition faction,
arguing it indicated his involvement in the plan to divide the SPLM-IO
and destroy the peace deal.
(ST)
Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following
rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their
Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.
- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments
Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on
the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.
There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to
express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your
comment as an article to [email protected]
Kind regards,
The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
12 August 08:26, by Akol Liai Mager
President Kiir Mayardit’s version on who saved who is absolutely
correct. Kiir did saved Machar and Dak is just being negative about
President for the sake of negativity. Those who know Kiir would not
doubt his love for humanity. He cannot harm and that claim that he
wanted to kill Machar is a lie. Kiir is the reason why Machar still
breathing if he does.
repondre message
12 August 10:33, by jubaone
Akol,
Whether Kiir saved Machar’s life is less important. The
question is, is Kirr in control of his jienge SPLA? How do you explain
the serious human rights violations that followed the alleged coup?
You need very intelligent people to plan and execute a successful coup
and attribute it to Machar, not illiterate stupid luak boys who can’t
even think and write. Try again buddy.
repondre message
12 August 08:29, by Akuma
Dak,
Please don’t fool the world, you yourself engineers the recent
conflict of J1. You circulates the message on SPLM-IO officials Phones
on friday 8 July 2016 before incident J1 happen that claiming your
boss has been held hostage and you are outside the palace. Also
reminder the world about your boss death.
--
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/southsudankob
View this message at
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/southsudankob/topic-id/message-id
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14ooPguNou1mgmcyM4zJmqFZDGvtJhJYmyNQeyUKsZSyn5w%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
