SPLM-IO says peace not possible with President Kiir

   - Article <http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article60086#tabs-1>
   - Comments (10)
   <http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article60086#tabs-2>

[image: email] Email
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?iframe&page=enviar_email_articulo&id_article=60086>
[image: print] Print
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?iframe&page=imprimable&id_article=60086>
[image: pdf]Save
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=spipdf&spipdf=spipdf_article&id_article=60086&nom_fichier=article_60086>
[image: separation]
[image: increase] <http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article60086#>
[image: decrease] <http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article60086#>
[image: separation]
[image: separation]

   - [image: Inline image 1]
   
<http://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sudantribune.com%2Fspip.php%3Farticle60086&t=SPLM-IO%20says%20peace%20not%20possible%20with%20President%20Kiir%20-%20Sudan%20Tribune%3A%20Plural%20news%20and%20views%20on%20Sudan>
   - [image: Inline image 2]
   
<http://www.myspace.com/Modules/PostTo/Pages/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sudantribune.com%2Fspip.php%3Farticle60086&t=SPLM-IO%20says%20peace%20not%20possible%20with%20President%20Kiir%20-%20Sudan%20Tribune%3A%20Plural%20news%20and%20views%20on%20Sudan>
   - [image: Inline image 3]
   
<http://twitter.com/share?text=SPLM-IO%20says%20peace%20not%20possible%20with%20President%20Kiir%20-%20Sudan%20Tribune%3A%20Plural%20news%20and%20views%20on%20Sudan&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sudantribune.com%2Fspip.php%3Farticle60086>
   - [image: Inline image 4]
   
<http://buzz.yahoo.com/submit?submitUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sudantribune.com%2Fspip.php%3Farticle60086&submitHeadline=SPLM-IO%20says%20peace%20not%20possible%20with%20President%20Kiir%20-%20Sudan%20Tribune%3A%20Plural%20news%20and%20views%20on%20Sudan&submitSummary=%20August%2030%2C%202016%20%28JUBA%29%20%E2%80%93%20The%20leadership%20of%20the%20South%20Sudanese%20President%2C%20Salva%20Kiir%2C%20is%20a%20violent%20dictatorship%20and%20the%20country%20will%20not%20see%20peace%20%28...%29%20>

------------------------------

[image: Pedestrians and traffic move past a billboard featuring portraits
of President Salva Kiir (L) and SPLM-IO leader Riek Machar in Juba, on
April 14, 2016. (Photo AFP/Albert G. Farran)]
August 30, 2016 (JUBA) – The leadership of the South Sudanese President,
Salva Kiir, is a violent dictatorship and the country will not see peace as
long as he remains the president, says media official in the office of the
former First Vice President, Riek Machar.

In an interview with the Voice of America (*VOA*) Nightline Africa on
Sunday, James Gatdet Dak, spokesperson for the leader of the opposition
faction of the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM-IO), said President
Kiir was only interested in violence as a means to maintain his leadership
and has no vision for the new country.

Dak was responding to the recent call by President Kiir to try to persuade
the region and the international community at large to ensure that Machar
would not come back to Juba and take part in the Transitional Government of
National Unity (TGoNU) as its legitimate First Vice President, despite his
controversial removal and replacement with his former chief negotiator,
Taban Deng Gai.

Kiir was opposed to regional and international calls to reinstate Machar,
arguing that his former deputy’s return to Juba as First Vice President
would “prolong war” in the country.

The President further argued that he has a good working relationship with
his new first deputy, Gai, whom he described as someone “cooperating” with
him.

However, Machar’s spokesperson said that the comments by President Kiir to
further “remove his peace partner” indicated that he was not interested in
peace or to implement the peace agreement he signed in August last year.

Dak said the relationship between Kiir and Gai was not a “cooperation” to
fully implement the peace agreement, but was based on the fact that Gai had
“surrendered” to Kiir and the two of them agreed to scrap from the IGAD
brokered peace deal the main provisions which were vital for various
sectors reforms and change in the country.

He said President Kiir only wanted a “stooge” as his deputy who would agree
with the status quo in the country.

*NO PEACE WITH KIIR*

In a separate phone interview with *Sudan Tribune* on Tuesday, the
opposition leader’s spokesperson said it will be difficult for the country
to achieve peace with President Kiir as the head of state.

“I personally have a strong feeling that as long as Salva Kiir remains the
President of our country, there will never be peace and prosperity, but
only a vicious cycle of violence, corruption, tribalism and lack of
services delivery and development” Dak told Sudan Tribune when contacted on
phone.

“The people of South Sudan will continue to suffer because they will only
be hearing from him [Kiir] a manipulated, non-committal and violent
so-called peace that will instead continue to kill people, loot their
property, rape young girls and women and displace populations. His
leadership is synonymous with violence, war after war,” he further claimed.

He charged that after the 15 December 2013’s civil war which he said the
President created, but was brought to an end by a peace agreement in August
2015, a leader who had his country and people in his heart and wanted peace
and stability would not again have violated the agreement by attacking his
peace partner.

The leadership in Juba, he said, is currently on a mission to deceive the
people of South Sudan, leaders in the region and in the world at large with
“false promises” in their “desperate” attempt to seek support and later on
forget about the promises.

Dak further claimed that President Kiir has no vision for South Sudan and
was not ready for what he would have done next for the welfare of the
people after independence in July 2011. He added that the President and his
“corrupt” officials close to him only knew one thing, and that was to “loot
the country and put its resources into their pockets for personal benefits
and kill or torture their subjects who dare to question their bad deeds.”

He also said the South Sudanese leader is a dictator who will never allow
democracy and freedoms to take roots in South Sudan.

The East African regional bloc, or IGAD, looks divided over whether to
reinstate Machar or recognize the new First Vice President, Gai, despite
their earlier communiqué which suggested Machar’s reinstatement.

The situation has also led to the Joint Monitoring and Evaluation
Commission (JMEC), admitting it is “confused” and may work with the new
first deputy as a “no option” position. JMEC, a body established under the
Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in South Sudan (ARCISS) to
monitor the full implementation of the peace deal, is chaired by former
President of Botswana, Festus Mogae.

IGAD’s heads of state and government released a communiqué on 5 August in
Addis Ababa, asking for reinstatement of Machar and for Gai to step down.

United Nations Security Council (UNSC) also passed a resolution describing
Machar’s replacement as “inconsistent” with the peace agreement.

However, U.S Secretary of State, John Kerry, on his visit to the Kenyan
capital, Nairobi, last week said there was nothing wrong in replacing
Machar with Gai, saying the peace deal had provided for replacements of
officials.

Machar, who has just recovered from “exhaustion and swollen legs” after
fleeing Juba on 8 July and walking to the neighboring Democratic Republic
of Congo (DRC) and then transferred to Khartoum, Sudan, has not yet come
out with public reaction to the new situation.

His spokesman, Dak, earlier told the media that his boss will make a public
statement at an “appropriate time.”

(ST)
Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules.
Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan
Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the
site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express
yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an
article to [email protected]

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article60086#forum>

   - 31 August 09:00, by Kerem

   There is no way you can slap somebody and then you expect a good smile
   from him. You are known for slapping the government thinking that it will
   not feel the pain. Kiir is a very honest and peaceful man but you guys were
   using his religious behavior to torment him. Maybe those who are
   retaliating your slaps are his men but not from his directives.

   repondre message
   
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=forum&id_article=60086&id_forum=352693>
   - 31 August 09:30, by Malakal county Simon

      What do you expect from a dicator man like unwanted president Kiir?
      of course, change must come through bullets otherwise, we are all wasting
      our times because unwanted president Kiir has clearly shown to
the people’s
      of South Sudan and the world, that he does not care about this peace!!!!
      And according to his constantly illegal actions, he has considered this
      peace as the no go peace!!!!

      repondre message
      
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=forum&id_article=60086&id_forum=352695>
      - 31 August 10:45, by Mr Point

         Why is Kiir despised and distrusted by international leaders?

         Because he is incompetent. He has failed to keep any agreement
         that he has signed in front of witnesses. He was found lying
directly to
         Barack Obama over Heglig. He should be able to provide peace for
         development. Instead his paranoid invention of fake coups has brought
         endless tribalism revenge wars.

         repondre message
         
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=forum&id_article=60086&id_forum=352697>
         - 31 August 12:37, by wacjak

         Malakal,
         Use your bullets to capture your namesake town. Do not bore us on
         the internet with lies. For more than two years, you have been using
         bullets to get rid of Kiir, but you could not. Who is wanted in South
         Sudan? Your Traitor Machar is the most Unwanted person in
this country. His
         existence is tantamount to suffering and death.

         repondre message
         
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=forum&id_article=60086&id_forum=352710>
         - 31 August 11:10, by Kerem

   Who is Obama in South Sudanese affairs to be told the truth. Has there
   been any one day America has told any African leader the truth behind their
   destruction in Syria, Iraq, and Libya? Why don’t we trust our capabilities?
   The same you will accuse Riek of being incompetent if he tries to manager
   his Country’s affairs and avoid getting married to the Western leaders

   repondre message
   
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=forum&id_article=60086&id_forum=352702>
   - 31 August 13:41, by Mr Point

      Maybe you will understand when you are a little older

      repondre message
      
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=forum&id_article=60086&id_forum=352714>
      - 31 August 11:46, by chuol

   ’’Whisky Kiir’’ is a total cursed to people of South Sudan, but the good
   thing is that he has inflicted a very big damage to his greedy Dinka tribe
   who will suffer in South Sudan for centuries to come once he is killed and/
   or dislodged out from presidency.

   repondre message
   
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=forum&id_article=60086&id_forum=352704>
   - 31 August 12:01, by Lango2010

      Most South Sudanese will never realized the truth if they don’t come
      together as a nation. if that is so then there is no way we can
discard one
      tribe or one man out as a worse sinner. who really worthy in
this country?
      neither Kiir nor Riak. even you who incite violent and division are not
      worthy of bring peace to our nation.

      repondre message
      
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=forum&id_article=60086&id_forum=352707>
      - 31 August 12:06, by Kerem

      Chuol,

      If Riek will be the president and the he implements what you are just
      saying, then he is not fighting for a democratic change. Remember great
      leaders do not retaliate but rather unite people. After all Riek has done
      enough harm than good to the whole nation including Nuer community who
      cannot even see this because of Dinkaphobic belief

      repondre message
      
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=forum&id_article=60086&id_forum=352709>
      - 31 August 13:33, by Redeemer

   Chuol
   Riek started his business of making Our people kill themselves and die
   in their thousands as early as 1991. What democracy was he fighting for?
   There never a tribal rebellion in the history of SSudan but Riek initiated
   it which is now being copied in Equatoria where Martin Kenyi is leading his
   and the rest

-- 
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/southsudankob
View this message at 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/southsudankob/topic-id/message-id
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14oq6Q_UvH2BEVRhnBAJ50OmUobaW8cN1JjuPi33Wrio%2BVg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to