---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: John Ashworth <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 19:22:31 +0300
Subject: [sudans-john-ashworth] South Sudan: role of civil society
vital in seeking peace
To: Group <[email protected]>

South Sudan: role of civil society vital in seeking peace

World Council of Churches
04 October 2016

The World Council of Churches (WCC) co-organised a discussion in
Geneva on 28 September entitled “Rebuilding from below: The role of
local civil society in South Sudan.”

“The South Sudanese have the right to peace,” said Rev. Dr Martin
Junge, general secretary of the Lutheran World Federation.

There are now more than 1 million South Sudanese seeking refuge, he
said, and if any future peace agreement will work, it needs the
involvement of multiple civil society actors.

Four panelists and a 100-person audience attempted to define the term
“civil society.” Fr James Oyet Latansio, general secretary of South
Sudan Council of Churches, said the church was on the side of the
grassroots. “We must give voice to the voiceless,” he said, adding
“women are more influential than men. Women are full-time, men are
part-time,” which, as well as eliciting a general murmur of amusement,
suggested taking a different approach.

John Ashworth, advisor to the WCC on South Sudan, stressed that all
players need to be realistic. Civil society, “is weak, young,
fragmented…made up of urban elites not in touch with rural people.” He
added that the church has a major role in this space and that a third
element, “traditional” civil society – tribal chiefs, including elder
women – could not be ignored.

Teohna Williams, conflict advisor on South Sudan, said that South
Sudan is extremely polarised and politicized and inadvertently, civil
society influences or is influenced by a political agenda. Trying to
work toward ending violence, she said, can be political in nature,
even when not attempting to be so.

The means to securing a ceasefire was a key focus. “If you can stop
the killing, it gives a window of opportunity to address peace,” said
Ashworth.

Matthias Wevelsiep, right to peace senior advisor of Finn Church Aid,
said that international actors need to support civil society toward a
ceasefire, but that currently the international community was not
holistic in its approach.

Williams shared an anecdote that starkly illustrated the intense
difficulty in securing peace. She described a town in which there were
“horrific levels of suffering,” and more soldiers than civilians.
Community leaders had called a meeting, to which 500 came, including
representatives of the government. To reduce tension, it was suggested
that opposition troops should be “cantoned” – the process of placing
combatants into a camp where they agree to stay in order to ensure
they don't fight. But this in itself risked exacerbating the situation
as cantoning can be used to the advantage of one of the parties. So
despite seeking a solution, a simple-sounding step can backfire.

Reconciliation also emerged as a key theme. Ashworth noted that
reconciliation can not be imposed, and will also take considerable
time.  He outlined a church-led strategy for consultation with “real
grassroots” – echoing James’s earlier point – which would take two to
three years. Reconciliation itself, he insisted, would take a further
10-20 years.

Wevelsiep agreed but was also positive that a lasting peace could be
achieved. He cited “places elsewhere in Africa where infrastructures
for peace are developing,” in Ghana and Liberia, for example.

The need for reconciliation was starkly illustrated by Latansio when
he said: “We killed, we raped, we abused – we did everything…but we
aim for a blessed peace.” With 64 tribes, reconciliation will always
be a great challenge in South Sudan. Nonetheless, he outlined the
church’s route to national healing through programmes to promote
advocacy, neutral forums and reconciliation. He suggested that South
Sudanese society was a pyramid, with what he termed “stakeholders” at
the top, “grassroots” at the bottom and in between them, “brokers.” It
is this last group that has done so much damage in the past, he
maintained. The brokers misled the grassroots about the intentions of
the stakeholders and vice versa; the brokers should now be cut out.

Williams asserted: “Many people feel either under significant pressure
to do what the government tells them or to leave the country.” She
described, however, a situation 18 months ago in a part of the country
where thousands had been displaced. One community was thirsting for
revenge. But their leaders brought them together and succeeded in
dissuading them – arguing that vengeance would only come back to haunt
them.

Finally, the notion of justice is clearly contentious in a context
such as South Sudan’s. Wevelsiep said there needed to be a
“progressive realisation of human rights. The violations of rights are
difficult to bear but we also need to come up with solutions that take
us to the next level.”

This point was also made by Ashworth, who stated that transitional
justice is always a compromise. It is important to focus on sequencing
or process, he said, and “justice and accountability should emerge as
part of the process.”

http://www.oikoumene.org/en/press-centre/news/in-south-sudan-201cgiving-voice-to-the-voiceless201d-focus-of-discussion?set_language=en

END
______________________
John Ashworth

[email protected]

+254 725 926 297 (Kenya mobile)
+211 919 695 362 (South Sudan mobile)
+44 787 976 8030 (UK mobile)
+88 216 4334 0735 (Thuraya satphone)
Skype: jashworth1

PO Box 52002 - 00200, Nairobi, Kenya

This is a personal e-mail address and the contents do not necessarily
reflect the views of any organisation

-- 
-- 
The content of this message does not necessarily reflect John
Ashworth's views. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, John Ashworth is
not the author of the content and the source is always cited.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "sudan-john-ashworth" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.co.za/group/sudan-john-ashworth
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "sudans-john-ashworth" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sudans-john-ashworth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/southsudankob
View this message at 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/southsudankob/topic-id/message-id
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14ooMLzsd9bb%2BMQkVgjHRi%3Dop45iSoYsYvyTdRZreus6GOQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to