---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Eric Reeves" <[email protected]>
Date: 28 Dec 2016 21:38
Subject: “U.S. State Department Praises Khartoum’s ‘Promises’ of Improved
Humanitarian Access,” Huffington Post
To: "Eric Reeves" <[email protected]>
Cc:

*“U.S. State Department Praises Khartoum’s ‘Promises’ of Improved
Humanitarian Access”*

*Huffington *Post, December 28, 2016  |  http://wp.me/p45rOG-20d
<http://wp.me/p45rOG-20d>

By Eric Reeves

The *U.S. State Department* yesterday issued a statement praising
Khartoum’s promise to improve humanitarian access in Sudan. But as the actual
language of the statement
<https://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2016/12/266095.htm> makes clear, nothing
has actually changed on the ground. The Obama administration State
Department spokesman speaks of “the Government of Sudan’s recent efforts to
improve humanitarian access” (full text below). But what are these efforts,
other than promises of the sort we have heard countless times before? The
same *National Islamic Front/National Congress Party regime* that last week
“amended the Directives and Procedures for Humanitarian Action” can change
them at the drop of a hat, as it has done on innumerable occasions. It is
simply disingenuous to declare that that “these revised directives
represent a *significant step* toward improving humanitarian access in
Sudan”: again, nothing has changed on the ground.

[image: bashir_finger_2_-b218c]
<http://sudanreeves.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/bashir_finger_2_-b218c.jpg>

*So just how trustworthy are President Omar al-Bashir and his brutal
henchmen in the National Islamic Front/National Congress Party regime? In
twenty-seven years of ruthless tyranny they have never abided by a single
agreement with any Sudanese party or actor---not one, not ever.*

The highly conditional, not to say speculative characterization of what
Khartoum has done is revealing: “We believe *when implemented*, these
revised regulations *will *facilitate humanitarian actors' efforts to get
aid to those in need.” The possibility of future implementation is all that
is being celebrated. Let’s remember that the *UN*, *African Union*, and *Arab
League* put together a proposal for humanitarian access to *South Kordofan *in
early *2012*. The* Sudan People’s Liberation Movement/Army-North* immediately
accepted the joint proposal; for its part, Khartoum declared its acceptance
but promptly reneged on that commitment
<http://allafrica.com/stories/201202080783.html>. And for the *past five
years* the regime has dithered, dodged, reneged on various
commitments, and shown
continuing bad faith
<http://sudanreeves.org/2012/03/17/why-no-pressure-on-khartoum-to-accept-humanitarian-access-proposal/>.
During this time great numbers of people have suffered terribly and died
for lack of humanitarian access. The regime has continued to give
encouraging diplomatic signs but in the end simply outwaited an
international community that tired of its efforts.

[image: south_kordofan_5_6_2012_11]
<http://sudanreeves.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/south_kordofan_5_6_2012_11.jpg>

*A severely malnourished young child in the Nuba Mountains of South
Kordofan---one of hundreds of thousands of Sudanese that the Khartoum
regime has deliberately cut off from international humanitarian relief*

Again disingenuously, the Obama administration spokesman declares:

We also welcome the recent access given to a U.N. interagency team to
travel and conduct a multi-sector assessment in Golo, Central Darfur, which
included the first civilian aircraft to land in Golo in five years.

First, we need to ask about the implications of a *five-year humanitarian
embargo *and what it reveals of the character of a regime that would impose
such an embargo. Secondly, we need to remember that this year’s massive
military offensive in *Jebel Marra* (where *Golo* is located) was largely
successful: access is being permitted only because of a military triumph
that included the indisputable use of chemical weapons in egregious
violation of the Chemical Weapons Convention
<https://www.opcw.org/chemical-weapons-convention/> (see Amnesty
International, “Scorched Earth, Poisoned Air: Sudanese Government Forces
Ravage Jebel Marra, Darfur
<http://www.amnestyusa.org/research/reports/scorched-earth-poisoned-air-sudanese-government-forces-ravage-jebel-marra-darfur>,”
109 pages; released September 29, 2016). This blatant violation of
international law is nowhere mentioned in celebrating access to Golo, or
how Golo came to be firmly in regime hands.

[image: Screen Shot 2016-09-27 at 4.31.13 PM]
<http://sudanreeves.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Screen-Shot-2016-09-27-at-4.31.13-PM.jpg>

*A victim of Khartoum's use of chemical weapons in its devastating assault
this year on Jebel Marra---and military seizure of Golo, which had been
denied humanitarian access for five years.*

Finally, the statement declares:

Access to this conflict-affected area has allowed the U.N. to conduct a
full assessment; and—if sustained—regular air access would enable the
international humanitarian community to support relief efforts to Golo and
surrounding areas.

Of course the critical phrase is “if sustained.” And judging by the failure
of resolve on the part of the international community over the past 14
years in Darfur—including watching UN Security Council resolutions flouted
regularly and contemptuously
<http://sudanreeves.org/2007/09/24/darfur-remains-adrift-a-skeptical-assessment-of-resolution-1769/>—we
have every right to be deeply skeptical about whether Khartoum will feel
obliged to “sustain” these efforts longer than international pressure
remains.

The regime is deeply hostile to international humanitarian organizations in
Darfur and elsewhere in Sudan. Some thirty organizations have been expelled
by the regime or forced to leave because of threats directed at them and
intolerable security conditions—insecurity that the regime has deliberately
cultivated *(“Chaos by Design,”* in the words of Human Rights Watch
<https://www.hrw.org/reports/2007/sudan0907/sudan0907webwcover.pdf>). President
Omar al-Bashir and his cronies have
<http://sudanreeves.org/2008/10/28/humanitarian-efforts-in-darfur-face-escalating-war-by-khartoum/>
declared
some of the world’s finest relief organizations to be spies for *Israel* and
the *CIA*, to be “covers” for various international powers, to be engaged
in espionage, to countenance corruption…the list of absurd accusations is
long and frequently repeated. International workers have been beaten,
raped, and intimidated by violence on innumerable occasions. One notorious
incident from 2007
<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1540836/Aid-workers-tell-of-brutal-attack-by-Darfur-police-on-female-colleague.html>
speaks
volumes about Khartoum’s attitude and the freedom of intimidation if
accords its security officials:

Aid workers have described how they watched helplessly as Sudanese police
officers dragged a female United Nations worker from an aid agency compound
in Darfur and subjected her to a vicious sexual attack. Staff say they
feared for their lives when armed police raided their compound in Nyala
[South Darfur], dragging one European woman out into the street by her hair
and savagely beating several other international staff before arresting a
total of 20 UN, aid agency and African Union staff. (“Aid workers tell of
brutal attack by Darfur police on female colleague”)

We heard nothing from the Obama administration at the time.

The regime has long ago declared that it would be vigorously pursuing a
policy of “Sudanizing” humanitarian work in Darfur <http://wp.me/p45rOG-AN> and
elsewhere; this is little more that a cover for ensuring the final removal
of all remaining international organizations, and thus international eyes
on the ground.

[image: The annihilation of Darfur High Resolution]
<http://sudanreeves.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/The-annihilation-of-Darfur-High-Resolution1.jpg>

*Khartoum has been engineering what Human Rights Watch has called "chaos by
design" for over a decade; even so, the primary instrument of
ethnically-targeted civilian destruction remains village destruction, which
continues to this day.*

Given this shameful history of abuse, slanderous accusations, and
expulsions of these humanitarian organizations, it is highly irresponsible
of the Obama administration to celebrate the merely nominal commitments of
Khartoum, whether in Jebel Marra, other regions of Darfur, or the large
SPLM/A-N-controlled territories in *South Kordofan* and *Blue Nile*. Denial
of humanitarian access on such a scale amounts to crimes against humanity
under the terms of the *Rome Treaty* that is the statutory basis for
the *International
Criminal Court* (see my article *"On the Obstruction of Humanitarian
Aid,"* *African
Studies Review**, Volume 54, Number 3 | December 2011), pages 165 – 74* |
http://wp.me/p45rOG-I6 ).

Praising those guilty of such terrible crimes for mere promises is
expediency of the worst sort.

*[Eric Reeves* has written extensively on Sudan for almost two decades; he
is a Senior Fellow at Harvard University’s François-Xavier Bagnoud Center
for Health and Human Rights]

**************

*Africa: Sudan Issues New Humanitarian Directives
<http://links.govdelivery.com/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkPTIwMTYxMjI4LjY4MTI2OTAxJm1lc3NhZ2VpZD1NREItUFJELUJVTC0yMDE2MTIyOC42ODEyNjkwMSZkYXRhYmFzZWlkPTEwMDEmc2VyaWFsPTE3MTEyMjU0JmVtYWlsaWQ9Y2luZHkuYnVobEBtYWlsLmhvdXNlLmdvdiZ1c2VyaWQ9Y2luZHkuYnVobEBtYWlsLmhvdXNlLmdvdiZmbD0mZXh0cmE9TXVsdGl2YXJpYXRlSWQ9JiYm&&&100&&&http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2016/12/266095.htm>*

Press Statement

Mark C. Toner
Deputy Department Spokesperson | Washington, DC

December 27, 2016

The United States welcomes the Government of Sudan’s recent efforts to
improve humanitarian access. Last week, Sudan amended the “Directives and
Procedures for Humanitarian Action.” These revised directives represent a
significant step toward improving humanitarian access in Sudan. We believe
when implemented, these revised regulations will facilitate humanitarian
actors' efforts to get aid to those in need. We recognize this as a
positive step and we expect to see sustained gains in humanitarian access.

We also welcome the recent access given to a U.N. interagency team to
travel and conduct a multi-sector assessment in Golo, Central Darfur, which
included the first civilian aircraft to land in Golo in five years. Access
to this conflict-affected area has allowed the U.N. to conduct a full
assessment; and—if sustained—regular air access would enable the
international humanitarian community to support relief efforts to Golo and
surrounding areas. The United States, as part of its longstanding
commitment to the people of Sudan, will continue to support humanitarian
efforts there, and will work with all parties to remove remaining
impediments to full humanitarian access.

*Eric Reeves*, Senior Fellow at Harvard University’s François-Xavier
Bagnoud Center for Health and Human Rights



[email protected]

www.sudanreeves.org

Twitter@SudanReeves

About Eric Reeves: http://sudanreeves.org/about-eric-reeves

Philanthropy: goo.gl/Ii4buw

-- 
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/southsudankob
View this message at 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/southsudankob/topic-id/message-id
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14oonECd%3DfUbuOEpZqCAeO%2B1rnFxyR4K67_HdkJVhT4iUrw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to