S. Sudan President’s seal and signature "not used" to request money from
the Central Bank

   - Article <http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article61295#tabs-1>
   - Comments (5) <http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article61295#tabs-2>

[image: email] Email
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?iframe&page=enviar_email_articulo&id_article=61295>
[image: print] Print
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?iframe&page=imprimable&id_article=61295>
[image: pdf]Save
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=spipdf&spipdf=spipdf_article&id_article=61295&nom_fichier=article_61295>
[image: separation]
[image: increase] <http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article61295#>
[image: decrease] <http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article61295#>
[image: separation]
[image: separation]
------------------------------

January 3, 2017 (JUBA) – Several of seals and stamps were found at the
premises of Click Technologies Ltd by the security personnel from the
General Intelligence Bureau (GIB) during searches conducted as part of
inquiries into the alleged theft of huge sums of money from the office of
the South Sudanese President, Salva Kiir, new details have emerged.
[image: PNG - 165.4 kb]*South Sudanese president Salva Kiir (AFP)*

The contentious case involved the $500 million allegedly stolen from the
president’s office and transferred to the account of John Agou in Nairobi,
Kenya in favor of Mayen Wol Jong, the Chief Administrator and Executive
Director Yel Luol Koor.

According to the report released by Legal Watch Associates South Sudan,
Koor and Agou were tasked by the investigations committee to explain how
seals and stamps from government institutions ended up at Click
Technologies Ltd, owned by the latter.

“This particular seal was requested by the Executive Director in the Office
of the President, Yel Luol from Click Technologies Ltd. The seal was made
bearing writing for the “Office of the President’’. When the seal was
delivered to the Executive Director, the Executive Director rejected it
because they only need the seal with writing ‘’The President’’ and not the
one for the “Office of the President”, said Agou in his statement before
the High Court.

He further added, “The Company made the correct seal and delivered it to
the Office of the President and took back the incorrect seal with intention
to destroy it. That’s how the seal ended up being found in the premises of
Click Technologies Ltd”.

However, when asked to also explain how the seal for the army chief of
general staff ended up at his Click Technologies Ltd, Agou, who owns the
company, claimed the seal was requested by the personal assistant of the
chief of general staff, identified as Captain Dut Yai.

“The seal was produced by Click Technologies Ltd with the writings “The
Republic of South Sudan – Office of the Chief of General Staff-SPLA/SPLM”
and also bearing the “Coat of Arms for the Republic of South Sudan”. When
the seal was ready, the company called Capt. Dut Yai to pick it and he
picked it up. A few days later, he came back and said that the seal has
some errors and that he need a new seal bearing “Coat of Arms of SPLA” and
writings, “The Republic of South Sudan - Chief of General staff-SPLA”, Agou
told the court.

“The correct seal was made and delivered to him and the company took back
the incorrect seal with intention of destroying it. This is how the
security personnel ended up impounded it at the premises of Click
Technologies Ltd,” he added.

Testimonies contained in court documents *Sudan Tribune* obtained further
showed that the scanned signature of the president that was found in one of
the computers impounded at the premises of Click Technologies Ltd by GIB
security personnel was only used for the process of producing executive
portraits of the South Sudan leader.

“The sample of the signature was provided by the Executive Director in the
Office of the President and its usage on the portrait photos of H.E. the
President was approved in 2012 by a committee composed of former Legal
Advisor to the President, Telar Ring Deng, former Minister in the Office of
the President, Emmanuel Lowilla and former Minister of Information and
Broadcasting, Barnaba Marial Benjamin,” partly reads a section of
testimonies contained in court documents.

“The above mentioned Seals and the Signature of the President were NOT used
on any financial documents requesting for payments from the Ministry of
Finance and Economic planning or the Central Bank of South Sudan, neither
were they used by the anybody for any official or unofficial purpose,” it
adds.

Meanwhile, auditors and investigators denied that the seals and signatures
found were used for any illegal activities when asked by the defense
lawyers during the trial into the alleged corruption case.

An aide to the president, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the
South Sudanese leader’s signature is only used for specific functions,
citing appointment of government officials, dismissal of the same
government officials, correspondence with other heads of state, confirmed
death sentences and grant pardons to people convicted, promote army and
other organized forces officers and retired them also according to the law,
among other official matters.

“But no such function was done without the knowledge of the president that
was shown to the court as evidence, despite the high propaganda that was
said by security personnel that the signature of the president was used to
request money from the central bank by John Agou,” the official told *Sudan
Tribune* on Tuesday.

He added, “The president does not sign cheques, and neither does he have
sample signatures in any bank to use his signature to withdraw money,”

A report released by Legal Watch Associates South Sudan on the alleged
corruption in the office of the South Sudanese President’s office poked
holes in the process of administration of justice starting from the time of
arrests detention, investigation, trial, and sentencing up to conviction.

The case involved 16 people from different institutions including the
President’s office, Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning, Bank of
South Sudan and staff of Click Technologies Ltd.

(ST)
Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules.
Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan
Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the
site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express
yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an
article to [email protected]

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article61295#forum>

   - 4 January 07:10, by aarai baka

   Something is really going wrong here.there is no really specific
   explanation at all. There is cover Up in that report from some officials.

   repondre message
   
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=forum&id_article=61295&id_forum=360207>
   - 4 January 10:19, by Kush Natives

   This is really very shameful to our leaders! Is Mr. President Salva Kiir
   seeing such a thing or he’s typically part of it?

   repondre message
   
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=forum&id_article=61295&id_forum=360234>
   - 4 January 13:37, by Tut Gatkuoth

      Your comment to this article is completely irrelevant, Back to the
      article. trying to cover the corruption case of the sixteen thieves will
      never help. It’s good that they are paying the price for what they have
      done. Companies like Click technology was just used to cover up for the
      million dollars that was taken in the name of stationary supply..

      repondre message
      
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=forum&id_article=61295&id_forum=360251>
      - 4 January 13:46, by Tut Gatkuoth

      Doesn’t make sense at all; why the group forged the signature and
      illegally used the seal if the president was involved. Let’s face the
      truth.posting all this articles even exposes you the sixteen thieves more
      to the citizens. you face the law and let your family members
benefit from
      the stolen hidden dollars because that is what you ’guy’ deserves

      repondre message
      
<http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?page=forum&id_article=61295&id_forum=360253>
      - 4 January 16:25, by Future1

   I cannot support thieves let them face the law. I hope this is how we
   should move our country ahead. That is public money, South Sudan money not
   yours. Stop corruption and stealing in any forms.

-- 
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/southsudankob
View this message at 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/southsudankob/topic-id/message-id
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14oq4%3DCiiJF2YYQd7FKWYir1eRW3qFzyb65VG5gGbS-3P2g%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to