President Kiir says ready for positive working relations with new UN chief

    Article
    Comments (8)

email Email
print Print
pdfSave
separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

António Guterres (UN Photo)

January 6, 2017 (JUBA) - South Sudan President Salva Kiir expressed
readiness and optimism of forging new working relations with the new
Secretary General of the United Nations, António Guterres, saying his
administration appreciate and wants to enhance better working
relations with the new leadership

“Sometimes situation creates misunderstanding, it creates confusion
but with leadership, these challenges can be turned into opportunity
to address the issues of concern. I extend you, your Excellency, on
behalf of the people of South Sudan and the government the support
your office would require so that we all work together in championing
universal principles and ideals enshrined in the UN charter”,
president Kiir said in a congratulatory message address to the new
Secretary-General of the United Nations, António Guterres, who assumed
office this week.

Kiir said he would like the United Nations and other western countries
to look at South Sudan as a member state with equal rights,
sovereignty and leadership ready to work with the global community.

He said sanctions and arms embargo would not solve the problem but
rather support for peaceful dialogue and nonpartisan engagement of the
international community would address the conflict.

“We say sanctions and arms embargo would not contribute to addressing
the issues of war, instead they will exacerbate and undermine the
process”, he added in a 1st January 2017 message seen by Sudan Tribune
on Friday.

The message is his first official reaction to a draft resolution by
the United States, backed by Britain and France, seeking to impose
arms embargo after it warned of a risk of impending mass atrocities
and genocide.

The measure, however, fell short of the nine votes needed for adoption
in the 15-member council.

Russia, China, Japan, Malaysia, Venezuela and three African council
members — Angola, Egypt and Senegal, abstained from the voted after
they all expressed serious reservations.

Activists and human right groups viewed the rejection of the arms
embargo a setback for the United States, which helped South Sudan to
gain independence in 2011 but has been unable to steer the country
away from a war that erupted two years later.

If the proposal was approved it would have seen rebel leader Riek
Machar, Chief of General Staff of the government forces and a key ally
of President Kiir, Paul Malong and Information Minister Michael
Makuei, put on a sanctions blacklist and subjected to an assets freeze
and a global travel ban.

Japan, which has some 350 troops serving in the UN mission in South
Sudan, has argued that the measures, if adopted, would antagonize
President Kiir’s government and put peacekeepers’ lives at risk.

Opponents of the sanctions point to Kiir’s call earlier this month for
a national dialogue process to restore peace, saying that initiative
must be given a chance.

However, the former UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon was backing the
U.S. push for sanctions on South Sudan, saying an embargo would reduce
the capacity of all sides to wage war.

"If we fail to act, South Sudan will be on a trajectory towards mass
atrocities," Ban told the Council. The proposal provides for a
one-year ban on the “supply, sale or transfer” of “arms and related
materiel of all types, including weapons and ammunition, military
vehicles and equipment” as well as spares parts.

The world’s youngest nation, South Sudan descended into war in
December 2013, leaving tens of thousands dead and more than 3.1
million people displaced.

U.S. Ambassador Samantha Power argued at the time of failing to secure
the support of other members that all sides were mobilizing for more
fighting and that action was needed to prevent a bloodbath.

"The situation is not getting better, but worse, and we are sitting on
our hands," Power told the council on Monday. "Large-scale attacks
could start at any moment."

Russian Deputy Ambassador Petr Iliichev expressed different view of
the warning and cast doubt over warnings of a risk of genocide,
arguing that criminal groups and "undisciplined" troops were
responsible for mass violence, and not the government’s policy.

There is growing alarm over the humanitarian crisis in the country as
the conflict enters its fourth year.

More than 6 million people — half of South Sudan’s population — are in
need of urgent aid and humanitarian organizations expect this number
to rise by 20 to 30 percent next year.

Some 1.3 million South Sudanese have fled across borders as refugees,
including 383,000 who have fled to Uganda since July, according to UN
figures.

(ST)

 Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following
rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their
Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on
the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to
express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your
comment as an article to [email protected]

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.

    6 January 22:33, by Eastern

    ....and what happened with the former UN chief? Kiir’s a fool!....

    repondre message
        7 January 05:52, by Midit Mitot

        No more confusion to any UN representative to South Sudan
since the world knows your weak leadership ayaaaah Mathiang Anyoor
president.

        repondre message
            7 January 09:15, by Akuma

            Mitot

            UN New leadership will help to stabilize South Sudan in
peaceful manner compare to old regime of Ban Ki-Moon who UNMISS are
mean of regime change in South Sudan. All doors for Arm embargo and
sanction are being shut down.

            repondre message
        7 January 07:41, by dinkdong

        Just like he thought the U.S. President-Elect will solve South
Sudan issues, he thinks the incoming UN Secretary General will go
along very well with him. What a fool?! He don’t know they are not
dictators. Whatever they govern are govern by the law.

        repondre message
    7 January 01:27, by jur_likang_a_ likan’g

    Here is a criminal of a highest order trying to beg for good
relationship with the universal organisation that protects the rights
of international citizens from maltreatment of despotic, undemocratic
national leaders. There is no doubt that Kiir knows what they are
doing are wrong and there are consquences for that.

    repondre message
    7 January 03:53, by ngadodo

    Criminal always know how to manipulate people mind, what Salva
Kiir talk about reaction to newly chef of UN its nonsense he should
resign in order to give room to peace if caring for ss.

    repondre message
    7 January 08:57, by Dengda

    South Sudan now is like prostitute who settle for a man who give a
lot. We can afford to have two giants clashed on our issue or host
third world war in our soil. Russia, China and Korea are yearning for
Third world war and they constantly undermining USA, Nato and allied
as the world leaders. Russia hunting for support from poor in order to
wage war and using Poor country soldier as ground troops

    repondre message
    7 January 09:20, by Fair Man

    Let Kiir first form the Hybride court to try and punish the
criminals who masterminded the killings of South South Sudanese from
2013 to date. On the other side, Kiir and Dr. Riek, after being
accused by AU report of ordering unwarranted massacres at various
frontlines, including Juba, should voluntarily report themselves to
International Court, one after another. The courts in Juba can not try
al

-- 
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/southsudankob
View this message at 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/southsudankob/topic-id/message-id
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14opMREA0iYAdUzF%2B499tr6nmrmTpzCNddRjTNJ01gaj0MQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to