South Sudan’s War Threatens AU Credibility

"As of now, AU has no cue on how to end this war, all eyes are on the
West, USA and UN whereas, China and Russia have no desire to get into
such mess traditionally".
24 May 2017
By Benny Gudo

African Union face enormous challenges to restore peace and
tranquillity in all her member states for quite some time, as peace
stays on the brink from Cape to Cairo as a result of innumerable
factors. This commentary seeks to lay bare the sources of current
political ills on the continent as well as how it ran away from the
principles of pan-Africanism.

For starters, African Union had deviated from the ideals of
pan-Africanism, a product of Kwame Nkrumah's valued wisdom which gave
birth to Organization of African Unity (OAU) on 25 May 1963 in Addis
Ababa, Ethiopia. In it, pan Africanism was against kleptocracy,
nepotism, stereotyping, corruption, fascism, chauvinism, tyrannical
rule, monarchies, and many more.

Yet the latter invaded our land without the white man's hand, by then,
since he was not welcome in Africa because of the same despicable
systems aforesaid.

We (Africans) fought the liberation war in unison till we attained our
precious independence not only in Ghana or Zimbabwe, but in Africa as
a whole.  Unwillingly, the white man relinquished  power to the then
poor 'Blackman' afterwards.

However, our black- led governments' entrenchment to the precepts,
cannons and aphorisms of pan-Africanism was short lived because of the
Blackman's avarice and love for power.

To mentioned a few, the one-man one vote mantra was abolished and
substituted by monarchy rule, while on the other hand imperialist-like
system of governance resumed, this time, without the white man on the
forefront but the Blackman.

Abductions, ethnic cleansing, arbitrary arrests, torture, let alone
poverty and unemployment, is the order of the day in many African
states. Of which, such was not the wishes of pan-Africanists.

In this commentary, I will use South Sudan and Uganda as examples to
illustrate the discrepancies and weaknesses of our new child, AU,
compared to OAU. Why using South Sudan and Uganda? Some questions of
that nature may arise in other people's cognition but let me put the
record straight that in my commentary South Sudan will represent
war-torn nations whereas Uganda stands for perceived peaceful nations.

By that order, I shall forgo one by one.

South Sudan war:
First South Sudan, a young nation which started to see the light of
this earth on 9 July 2011, after decades of civil war with the North,
went for tough times since war broke out in 2013 between President
Salva Kiir's Dinka tribe and the Nuer tribe led by Dr Riek Machar.

Hundreds of thousands of South Sudanese lost their lives in this
on-going war and it's deplorable to note that there is no end insight
to the war save for threats, condemnations and isolations of parties
to the conflict by peace guarantors.

Yet the war intensified across the breath and width of the new nation
for the reasons that:
1. peace guarantors took sides.
2. The ruling party violates the     agreement willy-nilly.
3. Some regional leaders have a stake in this war.
4. The warring sides dare not care about the people's lives.

In that light, achieving peace remained a pipe dream in South Sudan.

As of now, AU has no cue on how to end this war, all eyes are on the
West, USA and UN whereas, China and Russia have no desire to get into
such mess traditionally. In the end, the barrel of the bullet gets the
leeway in the meantime.

However, the daunting task lies ahead because we are not so sure the
bullet will find peace. Events unfolding in Syria are a clear
testimony that the latter cannot bring peace in our backyards. So, why
repeating failed ideas?

Uganda:
The country, which shares the border with South Sudan, feels the heat
through conduction. Troops of South Sudanese refugees flood into
Uganda everyday amid famine and gun battles back home. As such, her
security is now at risk. Besides that, it's economy showed signs of
illness as demand ballooned rapidly compared to the supply.

Also, as a result of war in her neighbouring country,  its export
earnings whittled down, thereby paralyzed  her revenue collection
targets.

On the body politic, President Yoweri Museveni fast became a dictator
in his native Uganda. Some view him as another Idi Amin in the making
because of his iron fist rule. He hates opposition figures big time.

As of now, his long-time challenger, Biesege, wallows in prison on
trumped up charges- treasonous offense. That was the trend in Uganda
for many years.

But is this what we call pan-Africanism? l don't know, perhaps
President Museveni knows better than myself.

Burundi.
The winds of monsterism haunted Burundi, another East African nation.
Honourable Nkurunziza vehemently refused to handover the throne stick
to another bona fide Burundian on expiry of his two terms in office as
spelt by the supreme law of the land.

Instead, HE Nkurunziza manipulated the constitution to extent his rule
in spite of internal and external criticism. In the wake of that, war
erupted in his nation though the security sector came in his favour,
thwarted  the 'dissidents' to maintain the de facto.

However, that was not enough since EU and USA imposed tough sanctions
against Nkurunziza's administration and I am sure these sanctions have
a bearing on Burundi economy for, of late, its huge budgetary support
came from EU and USA.

In the aftermath, it’s the ordinary Burundi who is now suffering
because government is failing to pay its workforce meaningful salaries
and wages.

However, my concern is not on the economic side but rests on how AU
member states responded to the latter situation in Burundi and I cited
from the state paper, Herald of Zimbabwe on 23 May 2017, to avoid
mistakes:

Dar es Salaam. — Presidents of Tanzania and Uganda launched a
presidential campaign calling on the European Union (EU) to lift
sanctions against neighbouring Burundi. Tanzania’s Magufuli and
Uganda’s Museveni spoke on Saturday in the Tanzanian capital, Dar es
Salaam, where leaders of the East Africa Community (EAC) met for the
18th Ordinary Summit of Heads of State.

The Ugandan leader who was voted new chair of the EAC said in his
speech that the summit had tasked him to lead a delegation to Brussels
— seat of the EU — to discuss the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA)
and ‘‘the matter of sanctions over Burundi.’‘

They (Europeans) are taking sanctions against Burundi when they are
also facing difficulties at home like the Brexit.

He added that the group firmly objected to threats by the EU to harm
Kenya. He said the failure to sign the EPA was partly because of
sanctions on Burundi.

Is this pan-Africanism? In my view, our leaders want to do everything
in their disposal wantonly without any hindrance from anyone-to kill,
arrest, rape, steal, or abduct at their own pleasure. None should
question.

Last year there was stampede to withdraw from ICC amid bias on the
African side. Fine, we all agreed with them but that should not be a
problem only if the fate befell on them as leaders, rather a non-issue
on the generality of Africans.

No. We are all humans despite differences on colour, gender, tribe,
economic background, political affiliation, etc.; therefore we all
deserve fair treatment as well.

Lastly, it is pertinent to note that on the eve of Ghana's
independence on 6th march 1957, President Kwame Nkrumah declared
loudly that “the independence of Ghana is meaningless until it is
linked to the total liberation of the African continent”, meaning to
say that our independence, be it in Zimbabwe, Zambia, or Senegal, is
worthless if the likes of South Sudan, Somalia and Libya are at war.

Let's all share and embrace Nkrumah's wise leadership for the
betterment of our God given continent, Africa, otherwise AU
credibility remains questionable.

Together we make a difference.

The author can be reached via:
 gudobe

Posted in: Opinions
- See more at: 
http://gurtong.net/ECM/Editorial/tabid/124/ID/20495/Default.aspx#sthash.Y9JbBg3p.dpuf

-- 
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/southsudankob
View this message at 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/southsudankob/topic-id/message-id
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14ooP50NyfmKMAf%3DTusGi_KdWjYmUKt6KLLPcbR8jPGYTuw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to