The irrationality of the South African detainment of Riek Machar
Article
Comments (0)
email Email
print Print
pdfSave
separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation
By Duop Chak Wuol
The unlawful detention of South Sudanese rebel leader Dr Riek Machar
by South Africa is beyond the common sense of rationality. The South
African government’s decision to accept an outside influence to keep
Dr Machar under house arrest is no different from apartheid policy of
1948 when the “all-white government” rewarded people who committed
atrocities on its behalf and punished those who spoke out against its
vicious tyranny. For most South Sudanese, the decision is a clear
endorsement of a Gestapo-like campaign against the people of South
Sudan.
The South African government should know that world rebellions are not
created in South Sudan. Rather, they have been part of human
existence, their origin began before civilization, and the idea that
South Sudanese rebellion is an exception is merely a modern-day
political conspiracy in sheep’s clothing. The ongoing civil war is a
result of a well-planned coup orchestrated by Salva Kiir Mayardit and
Ugandan President Yoweri Kaguta Museveni. The South African government
has nothing to do with the war and should allow Dr Machar to leave its
land; preventing him from leaving amounts to complicity in Kiir’s
atrocities.
I agree with the fact that South Africa, like any other country, has
the right to help in finding a peaceful solution to the ongoing armed
conflict in South Sudan. But the South African government’s detainment
of Dr Machar seems to be an indirect support for Kiir’s atrocious
regime and is suspicious enough for any reasonable person to question
its plausibility.
Did Dr Machar commit any crime under South African laws?
The answer is a resounding no. Dr Machar did nothing wrong against the
South African government or its citizens, and South Africa should not
allow itself to be part of Kiir’s atrocious club by proxy.
The South African government has clearly violated Dr Machar’s rights
by illegally detaining him without any charges. Detaining someone who
committed no crimes is in itself a violation of human rights. I
believe that even The Constitutional Court of South Africa would find
that the South African government has violated Dr Machar’s rights. A
government cannot put a foreigner under house arrest and claim that
nothing is wrong. The people of South Africa should file a petition
demanding the immediate release of Dr Machar.
The people of South Sudan know very well that the plan to isolate Dr
Machar from East Africa was not engineered by South Africa. It was
instead orchestrated by Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni when the
then-former SPLM/A-IO chief negotiator and now illegitimate First Vice
President conspired with tyrant Kiir to kill Dr Machar in a bid to
take over the leadership of the armed opposition. Museveni later used
his friendship with Western leaders to win the backing of the former
United States administration under Barack Obama. The U.S. then waged a
secret diplomatic campaign in favour of isolating Dr Machar.
I believe that Dr Machar has unknowingly contributed to his own
isolation. Common sense and historical evidence tell us that nearly
all world rebellions were and are waged in the bushes. Logic also
tells us that a rebel leader does not need to live in a foreign city
to wage an armed rebellion. So, the idea that one needs to live in a
modern capital to successfully run a rebellion is pure nonsense.
Common sense would also tell us that a rebel leader can only live in a
foreign land if the host country agrees to it.
Dr Machar must not rely on questionable friends who secretly accept
bribes from Juba’s bloody regime in exchange for his exclusion from
South Sudanese politics.
The South African government has no reason whatsoever to keep Dr
Machar under house arrest. The sensible thing for South Africa to do
is immediately allow the South Sudanese rebel leader to leave its soil
because there is no reason under South African laws to keep him under
house arrest. Not unless the South African government wants to be a
part of known greedy foreign governments that are committed investors
in Kiir’s atrocities.
One cannot force a goat to live at the mercy of a ruthless hyena.
Imagine a vicious teeth-wielding hyena with a reputation of killing a
goat everyday demand that it be made the leader of all goats. Assume
the hyena, for some mysterious reason, becomes the leader of goats and
then summons all goats to its headquarters, orders them to build their
houses, tells them that its words are final, and warns that any goat
that violates its order will be sent to its grave by the force of its
gigantic teeth. Now take a deep breath and reflect on the lives those
goats would be subjected to under the rule of such a hyena.
The question then arises: what kind of a goat would want to live under
the control of such a brutal hyena? The answer is none unless one had
a supernatural power that would magically prevent the hyena from
slaughtering the goats.
Kiir is no different from a vicious hyena that kills goats with
impunity. His mighty teeth are his ethnic militias he empowers to kill
people, rape innocent women and girls, abduct young men, and burn down
homes of civilians who have nothing to do with the ongoing armed
conflict. Other political figures in Juba live like stranded goats at
the mercy of Kiir.
There are those who claim that other countries should not be blamed
for South Sudan’s armed conflict. What is ironic about this misleading
notion is that other nations are in fact part of the problem. Some of
these countries are actively fighting alongside South Sudan against
the armed opposition. For instance, Uganda is assisting Kiir’s regime
militarily against the rebels, Egypt is supplying South Sudan with
lethal weapons and ammunition, and the international community simply
buries its head in the sand.
There are currently many armed conflicts around the world that the
international community seems not to be interested in ending; South
Sudan’s civil war appears to be one of the conflicts the community of
nations shamelessly ignores. What I find ironic about this is that
every time Syrians are killed by their government, the international
community makes an uproar against the Syrian President. But whenever
the same act is committed in South Sudan, the world displays a high
level of hypocrisy.
Are South Sudanese lives different from those of Syrians? I strongly
believe the answer to this question is no because a South Sudanese
child has the same rights as a Syrian child. There is no doubt in my
mind that the South Sudanese civil war has exposed global hypocrisy in
a stunning way — and I am not quite sure if this level of hypocrisy is
a Western, African, or Eastern one.
Kiir’s merciless regime rationalizes its existence through killing,
and I don’t think the South African government wants to be part of it.
The decision by South Africa to keep Dr Machar under house arrest is
undoubtedly a complicit one. If Pretoria believes that it is not
colluding with Juba in its campaign to prevent Dr Machar from
participating in South Sudan’s politics, then it must allow Dr Machar
to leave its land. Failing to do so will only cement the already
alleged accusations that South Sudan has successfully bribed some
South African officials to help keep Dr Machar under house arrest. The
South African government has a choice to make: it must come clean by
releasing Dr Machar or else be seen as complicit in Kiir’s atrocious
regime. The people of South Sudan have heard enough about the
viciousness of the apartheid’s one-sided policy of 1948 and are
certainly not interested in seeing a similar policy in their own
country. If South Africa wants to be part of Kiir’s Gestapo-like
campaign against the South Sudanese, it should simply come out and not
hide behind Kiir’s bloody fedora.
Duop Chak Wuol is the Editor-in-Chief of the South Sudan News Agency.
He can be reached at [email protected]. The views expressed in this
article are his and should not be attributed to the South Sudan News
Agency.
--
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/southsudankob
View this message at
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/southsudankob/topic-id/message-id
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14ooGOaE4dsxQzCu-2cK-ADyc6NWBmtJeFfmULMxirzLzSg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
