---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Eric Reeves" <[email protected]>
Date: Aug 18, 2017 19:20
Subject: Rewarding Policies that Starve Children in the Nuba Mountains of
South Kordofan
To: "Eric Reeves" <[email protected]>
Cc:

*Rewarding Policies that Starve Children in the Nuba Mountains of South
> Kordofan*
>
> Eric Reeves | August 18, 2017 | http://wp.me/s45rOG-8046
>
> The *National Islamic Front/National Congress Party regime in Khartoum* has
> continued for over six years with its brutal, immensely destructive
> humanitarian blockade of rebel-controlled areas of *South Kordofan *and *Blue
> Nile* states. The results in the *Nuba Mountains* of South Kordofan have
> been devastating, and the poor harvests that seem likely this year because
> of weather conditions will make things much worse.
>
> Despite the continuation of the blockade, and despite “humanitarian
> access” as a key U.S. requirement for the permanent lifting of U.S.
> economic sanctions, the *Trump administration*—confused and easily
> strong-armed by the U.S. intelligence community—gives all signs of indeed
> lifting sanctions on Khartoum this coming *October 13th*, less than two
> months’ time from now.
>
>
> <http://sudanreeves.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/trump_flicker_face_yess.jpg>
>
> To be sure, it was the *Obama administration *that began this
> accommodation of the regime’s *génocidaires*, declaring in a preposterous
> and viciously expedient statement that there had been a “sea change” of
> improvement of humanitarian access in Sudan 
> <http://wp.me/s45rOG-8021>—including
> in this characterization of where “access” had improved both *Darfur* (where
> Khartoum continues to deny humanitarian access to roughly a third of the 3
> million people the UN declares are in need of assistance
> <http://reliefweb.int/report/sudan/sudan-humanitarian-bulletin-issue-18-31-july-13-august-2017>)
> and *South Kordofan*.
>
>
> <http://sudanreeves.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Screen-Shot-2017-01-14-at-12.35.29-PM.png>
>
> *Obama administration ambassador to the UN Samantha Power preposterously
> declared (January 13, 2017) that there had been a "sea change" of
> improvement in humanitarian access in Sudan*
>
> We learn how destructive the Obama administration’s gross
> misrepresentation of access issues is in a piece from *Bronwen Dachs*,
> which appeared yesterday in *The Boston Pilot*
> <http://www.thebostonpilot.com/article.asp?ID=180076/>; Dachs has worked
> as a reporter in Africa for *Catholic News Service (CNS) *for more than a
> quarter of a century.
>
> The entire dispatch appears below, but I highlight a moment that should
> bring the deepest shame to those members of the Obama administration who
> put in motion the move to reward Khartoum by initially lifting sanctions:
>
> "Here, I have shed tears watching emaciated women with babies on their
> backs being turned away when they get to the front of the long line because
> there is nothing left for them," Oliver Waindi, executive director of the
> Bishop Gassis Relief and Rescue Foundation, told CNS. "The suffering is as
> I imagine hell to be."
>
> "There are a lot of children dying here," Waindi said, noting that before
> the changed weather patterns of the past two years, "people had very little
> to eat, but now they have nothing at all."
>
> <http://sudanreeves.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/DSC01714.jpg>
>
> *Nuba child dying of starvation*
>
> Could there be a greater crime against humanity than to deny people in the
> most acute distress the most basic means of living? (See my discussion of
> this question in "On the Obstruction of Humanitarian Aid," *African
> Studies Review**, *Volume 54, Number 3 (December 2011), pages 165 – 74 |
> http://wp.me/p45rOG-I6/). And yet it continues, and all signs from U.S.
> diplomats and military/intelligence officials
> <https://www.dabangasudan.org/en/all-news/article/us-official-meets-with-sudan-speaker-explains-sanctions-decision>
>  make
> clear that the decision will be to lift permanently sanctions on this
> heartless and cruel regime, one that remains on the State Department list
> of “state sponsors of international terrorism”—and with good reason (see | 
> *http://wp.me/p45rOG-220/
> <http://wp.me/p45rOG-220/>*).
> *Khartoum’s Ambitions in the Nuba Mountains*
>
> Many things seemed to have escaped the attention of—or simply been ignored
> by—the Obama and Trump administrations. There were really only two
> significant conditions for the permanent lifting of sanctions: (1) improved
> humanitarian access (the degree of “improvement” left conveniently
> unspecified) and (2) the end of offensive military actions, including
> aerial bombardment of the Nuba Mountains—by *Antonov bombers* attacking
> fields, agricultural production, and civilian villages, and by much more
> precise military aircraft (e.g., the *Sukhoi-25’s *in the regime’s air
> force, which have repeatedly, deliberately attacked hospitals, including
> one operated by *Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF).*
> <http://sudanreeves.org/wp-admin/t>
>
>
> <http://sudanreeves.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Sukhoi_Su-24_inflight_Mishin-2.jpg>
>
> *A Sukhoi-25, used to attack the MSF hospital in Frandala, South Kordofan
> for a second time*
>
> <http://sudanreeves.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/photo-3.jpg>
>
> *Young Nuba child severely injured by an Antonov bombing attack*
>
> Perversely, by prohibiting aerial strikes, the Obama/Trump administrations
> have made all the more important the maintaining of the humanitarian
> blockade on South Kordofan and Blue Nile. War in these regions has been
> predominantly war against civilians: they have been the primary targets of
> aerial as well as ground assaults since violence began in *early June
> 2011*
> <http://sudanreeves.org/2011/07/17/us-un-refuse-to-speak-honestly-about-compelling-evidence-of-genocide-in-south-kordofan/>
> *.* Denied military opportunity to complete their ambitions in these two
> areas—historically aligned with South Sudan militarily and politically
> during the long civil war (*1983 – 2005)*—Khartoum depends even more now
> upon humanitarian blockades to subdue the rebellion growing out of the
> regime’s terrible abuses of the people of these regions.
>
> The identification of the civilian population with the military resistance
> is made clearest in a passage from *leaked minutes of an August 31, 2014
> meeting of the most senior military and security officials of regime* (the
> authenticity of these minutes has been established beyond reasonable doubt,
> and even the *U.S. State Department *acknowledges their authenticity; see
> | http://wp.me/p45rOG-1w5/).
>
> At one point in these minutes (which can be found in their entirety,
> including the Arabic original, at | http://wp.me/p45rOG-1wk/), we hear
> from *General Siddiq Amer, Director General of Intelligence and Security:*
>
> Let us continue to dismantle the armed movements. The mechanisms to do
> that are already in place and working*. This year the Sudan People’s Army
> (SPLA) managed to cultivate large areas in South Kordofan State. We must
> not allow them to harvest these crops. Good harvest means supplies for the
> war effort. We must starve them, so that, commanders and civilians desert
> them and then we can recruit the deserters to use them in the war to defeat
> the rebels.*
>
> Of course it was not the *Sudan People’s Liberation Movement/Army-North
> (SPLM/A-N) *that cultivated the crops but the people of South Kordofan.
> No doubt bountiful crops assist the SPLM/A-N to survive, but the conflation
> of the *people* of South Kordofan (the “cultivators”) and the *SPLM/A-N *is
> all too telling. And it is reflective of war policies by this regime in its
> various genocidal counter-insurgency efforts—in Darfur, in the oil regions
> of South Sudan, and in the Nuba Mountains during the terrible years in
> the *1990s* when the regime declared a *fatwa *against the Nuba people
> and imposed a precedent-setting humanitarian blockade.
> <http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/in-sudan-genocide-anew/2011/06/17/AGVhCVZH_story.html>
>
>
> <http://sudanreeves.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/south_kordofan_5_6_2012_11.jpg>
>
> *One victim of Khartoum's humanitarian blockade of the Nuba Mountains*
>
> *Consequences of Lifting Sanctions Permanently*
>
> Again, the Trump administration again gives every sign of permanent
> lifting sanctions on Khartoum, first imposed in *1997* by *President
> Clinton *in response to the regime’s conspicuous support of international
> terrorism—*Osama bin Laden* resided in Sudan from *1992 – 1996*, the
> years in which al-Qaeda came to fruition. Notably, the Clinton Executive
> Order imposing sanctions emphasized in its Preface “the prevalence of
> human rights violations, including slavery and the denial of religious
> freedom” <https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-1997-11-05/pdf/97-29464.pdf> (this
> language was ignored out of ignorance or mendacity by the current senior
> U.S. official in Khartoum, *Charge d’Affaires Steven Koutsis* |
> http://wp.me/p45rOG-24G/).
>
>
> <http://sudanreeves.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/cda-koutsis_new-347x433.jpg>
>
> *U.S. Charge d’Affaires in Khartoum, Steven Koutsis*
>
> How will Khartoum respond to this grossly misconceived decision by the
> Trump administration?
>
> Convinced that there will be no re-imposition of sanctions, no matter what
> it does domestically, the violence will increase in South Kordofan and
> humanitarian access will continue to be denied until South Kordofan is
> starved into submission. Military victory over the Darfur rebel groups was
> completed with the ghastly* Jebel Marra offensive of 2016*, in which *chemical
> weapons were used against civilians
> <https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2016/09/chemical-weapons-attacks-darfur/>*
> .
>
>
> <http://sudanreeves.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Screen-Shot-2016-10-11-at-3.26.05-PM.jpg>
>
> *An infant dying from a chemical weapons attack by Khartoum in the Jebel
> Marra region of Central Darfur; see the September 2016 Amnesty
> International report at
> | 
> https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2016/09/chemical-weapons-attacks-darfur
> <https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2016/09/chemical-weapons-attacks-darfur>/*
>
> And while violence remains at extremely high levels, this is primarily the
> responsibility of the militias, most notably the *Rapid Support Forces
> (RSF)*—now officially incorporated into the regular Sudan Armed Forces
> (SAF). And since the RSF will be redeployed to finish the military job in
> South Kordofan during the coming dry season (beginning in
> *November/December*), the people will be left at the mercy of the more
> irregular Khartoum-sanctioned Arab militia groups that are already
> responsible for most of the continuing predations upon African tribal
> groups, both in camps for displaced persons and in rural areas, where farms
> continue to be violently expropriated from their African owns on a wide
> scale (see | *(“Changing the Demography”:  Violent Expropriation and
> Destruction of Farmlands in Darfur,  November 2014 – November 2015" | 
> *December
> 1, 2015 |  http://wp.me/p45rOG-1P4/).
>
> In South Kordofan Khartoum will find the SPLM/A-N badly divided between
> the brilliant *leader of the Nuba, Abdel Aziz al-Hilu* and his *Blue Nile
> counterpart, Malik Agar*, and *senior SPLM/A-N official Yasir Arman*.
> Even with forces united, resistance would have been extremely difficult,
> given Khartoum’s redeployment of the RSF and its ability to focus
> militarily exclusively on South Kordofan and Blue Nile. Divided, the
> SPLM/A-N is greatly weakened.
>
> The consequences of the apparently inevitable military victory are too
> hideous to contemplate, especially given the fierce success of SPLM/A-N
> military resistance to date. But one thing I know from my time in the Nuba
> in *January 2003*—as the broadest outline of the *Comprehensive Peace
> Agreement (January 2005)* were coming into focus—is that the people of
> the Nuba will fight to the death. There will be no surrender, since in the
> view of the Nuba people surrender entails submitting to cultural
> extinction, loss of all land rights, and constant abuse by the immense
> holding force Khartoum will put in place.
>
> Humanitarian access may finally be granted, but only after military
> victory—and even then, only on what will be a thoroughly punitive and
> vengefully dilatory schedule set by Khartoum (which has refused to
> negotiate such access in good faith since the *February 2012*, when the 
> *Tripartite
> Agreement* on access was first proposed by the *UN*, the *African Union,* and
> the *Arab League).*
>
> The Nuba will have been destroyed.
>
> ***********************************
>
> *“In Sudan's Nuba Mountains, no food left, and children are dying,” **The
> Boston Pilot,*
>
> August 17, 2017 |
> http://www.thebostonpilot.com/article.asp?ID=180076
>
> by Bronwen Dachs
>
> When people talk about potential famine, they mention South Sudan. But
> about 1 million people who live just over the border, in Sudan's Nuba
> Mountains, also face a food emergency.
>
> "I call it famine," said Bishop Macram Max Gassis, retired bishop of El
> Obeid, Sudan. The "hunger the people are experiencing" in the Nuba
> Mountains is "not totally due to the cruelty of nature but, unfortunately,
> is man-made."
>
> A survey in the diocese's area of operation, published in June, found that
> 74 percent of respondents had no food in their homes and 55 percent had, in
> the previous 30 days, at least one member of the household go a whole day
> and night without eating at least once.
>
> South Sudan won its independence from Sudan in 2011, and Nuba was a
> disputed region that remained in Sudan, despite its people's affiliations
> with the South.
> Today, people in Sudan's Nuba Mountains are being bombed by their own
> government, Bishop Gassis told Catholic News Service. The Diocese of El
> Obeid issued a statement in early August stating that Nuba communities "are
> surrounded by battle lines, effectively isolated." It said delivery of
> basic services by the Sudanese government and international humanitarian
> organizations stopped in mid-2011.
>
> The diocese "is one of a handful of humanitarian actors delivering
> critical and life-saving assistance in the area under extremely difficult
> conditions characterized by high levels of insecurity," its statement said.
>
> The suffering "is evident in the vast number" of people needing food aid
> and is worse than any previous suffering in the memory of any diocesan
> staff member, the statement said.
>
> "Here, I have shed tears watching emaciated women with babies on their
> backs being turned away when they get to the front of the long line because
> there is nothing left for them," Oliver Waindi, executive director of the
> Bishop Gassis Relief and Rescue Foundation, told CNS. "The suffering is as
> I imagine hell to be."
>
> "There are a lot of children dying here," Waindi said, noting that before
> the changed weather patterns of the past two years, "people had very little
> to eat, but now they have nothing at all."
>
> Bishop Gassis said last year, the rainy season was poor, and this year
> floods have ruined what little people were able to plant. "To give you a
> picture of how bad things are," residents of the Nuba Mountains are walking
> for weeks to seek refuge in South Sudan, Waindi said. "They do that
> because, in South Sudan, when their turn comes to get a simple bowl of
> grain, they are more likely to get it," he said.
>
> *[Dachs has covered Africa for CNS for more than 25 years.]*
> --
>
> Eric Reeves, Senior Fellow at Harvard University’s François-Xavier
> Bagnoud Center for Health and Human Rights
>
>
>
> [email protected]
>
> www.sudanreeves.org
>
> Twitter@SudanReeves
>
> About Eric Reeves: http://sudanreeves.org/about-eric-reeves
>
> Philanthropy: 
> *http://ericreeves-woodturner.com/woodturnings-available-for-purchase-dire
> <http://ericreeves-woodturner.com/woodturnings-available-for-purchase-dire>*
>

-- 
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/southsudankob
View this message at 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/southsudankob/topic-id/message-id
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"South Sudan Info - The Kob" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/SouthSudanKob.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/SouthSudanKob/CAJb14oqf9rDqx5s%3DAB2u7Oag6Cb7_30-ane02xnWTmOcy%3D2PEw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to