I don't have any suggestions for how to get a patch accepted, but I will say that I have written a VU meter effect (because I needed to write the meter to a custom device) and found that the system is not that hard to work with. I believe that you will be well served to do your extension here rather than in an in house tool.
All that being said, the traffic on this list is so low as to be dead. I am not certain that anyone is still doing official work, though I suspect that someone is because I saw a release in the recent past. Good luck, and let me know if I can be of assistance, Claude On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 4:50 PM <ma...@riseup.net> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > we (my colleagues and I) are in need of some Sox functionality with > support for RF64 files and are thinking about adding proper (reading and > writing) support for RF64 files to sox instead of extending our own > in-house tool. Before diving in head-first, I wanted to ask around if > there are some reasons for not doing this or pointers on how to do this, > to make sure our patch will not be rejected. > It seems to me libsndfile also supports writing RF64 files already? > > Thank you! > > Best, > Manus > > > _______________________________________________ > SoX-devel mailing list > SoX-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-devel > -- I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web <http://like-like.xenei.com> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
_______________________________________________ SoX-devel mailing list SoX-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-devel
