IMO without really knowing who uses SoX the most, it's really a shot in the dark. Personally, I think CMake is a way more capable system. But if the developers of SoX prefer Autotools, then go with that. Whoever contributes the most to the project should really have the final say, if you're not making the decision from a user standpoint.
Just going on the fact that SoX is a C library that is licensed under GPL, I'd be willing to bet that most people who use it are also using Autotools. On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 12:02 PM Måns Rullgård <m...@mansr.com> wrote: > ma...@riseup.net writes: > > > Hi all, > > > > the CMake builds fails for you? I just tested it on Windows and WSL and > > on both platforms the build completes successfully. As it works for me, > > I'm in favour of keeping it. Which options do you need to pass to CMake > > for the build to succeed? > > It messes up with the gsm library. > > The fact that it works for you isn't a particularly strong argument for > keeping it. Can you not use the autoconf system? > > -- > Måns Rullgård > > > _______________________________________________ > SoX-devel mailing list > SoX-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-devel >
_______________________________________________ SoX-devel mailing list SoX-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-devel
